Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effects of Spinal Stabilization Exercises on Dynamic Balance and Functional Performance in Adults With Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT number | NCT03597191 |
Other study ID # | 19982 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | June 25, 2018 |
Est. completion date | November 11, 2018 |
Verified date | December 2018 |
Source | Texas Woman's University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The investigators would like to know which one of two exercise programs will have a greater
effect on balance, functional performance, daily function, and pain on individuals with low
back pain (LBP) after 2, 4 and 8 weeks.
Specifically, the differences in dynamic balance, functional performance, pain intensity, and
disability level will be compared between participants who receive spinal stabilization
exercises program (SSE) and those who receive a general exercise program (GE) which includes
range-of-motion (ROM) and flexibility exercises.
The research hypotheses are:
1. The SSE program will significantly improve dynamic balance and functional performance in
adult participants with sub-acute and chronic LBP at two and four weeks as well as after
an eight-week follow-up after initiating intervention.
2. The SSE program will significantly improve pain intensity and disability level in adult
participants with sub-acute and chronic LBP at two and four weeks as well as after an
eight-week follow-up after initiating intervention.
3. In adult participants with sub-acute and chronic LBP, the group receiving the SSE
program will demonstrate significantly improved dynamic balance, functional performance,
pain intensity and disability levels compared to the placebo group receiving the GE
program at two and four weeks as well as after an eight-week follow-up after initiating
intervention.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | November 11, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | November 11, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Individuals between the age of 18 to 65 years 2. Individuals who have low back pain (LBP) for 6 weeks or more 3. ability to understand, speak, and follow verbal instructions in English 4. the average pain level of at least 2 out of 10 in the past week Exclusion Criteria: 1. serious spinal conditions such as fracture, infection, or tumor 2. signs of nerve root compression 3. a history of lower extremity or lumbar spine surgery 4. a history of hip, knee, or ankle pain in the previous two years 5. current pregnancy 6. systemic joint disease (e.g. rheumatologic or neurological disorders) 7. vestibular or other balance disorders 8. ongoing treatment for inner ear, sinus, or upper respiratory infection 9. concussion within the previous three months 10. a history of falls or fear of falling 11. a need for any form of walking aids (cane, walker) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Texas Woman's UniversityT. Boone Pickens Institute of Health Sciences-Dallas Center | Dallas | Texas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Texas Woman's University | Texas Physical Therapy Association |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change on dynamic balance | Dynamic balance measured by the Y-balance Test (YBT). Dynamic balance is quantified by measuring how far the reach indicator is placed relative to the stance platform while maintaining a unilateral stance. A farther reach distance is indicative of greater dynamic balance. To score each of the three directions, the reach distances (measured in cm) are averaged and normalized to the participant's leg length. As such, YBT scores are expressed as a percentage of leg length. Normalization is performed by dividing each reach distance by the participant's leg length and then multiplying by a hundred. Next, the composite score will be calculated by taking the average between right and left reach distances for all three directions and then summing the averages of the three reach directions. The score then will be divided by three times the average leg length and multiplied by 100. | Change from baseline at two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks post intervention. | |
Primary | Change on functional performance | Functional performance measured by Functional Movement Screen (FMS). Each participant will perform all 7 components of the FMS tests including deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg-raise, trunk push-up, and trunk rotary stability tests. Participants will perform 3 trials for each of the 7 FMS tests, and the best score from the 3 trials will be recorded. In addition, each participant will perform 3 clearance screens. These 3 clearance screens evaluate pain and are graded as negative or positive. If a participant has no pain, the clearing test is considered negative. If there is an increase in pain, the clearing test is considered positive and the associated test will be scored zero. For movements that are scored on both limbs, the lower score will be used to compute the composite score. The total score of the 7 tests will be added together to get a composite score of the FMS. | Change from baseline at two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks post intervention. | |
Primary | Change on pain intensity level | pain intensity as perceived by the participant measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The NPRS is an 11-point numerical scale (0-10), in which higher scores mean greater pain intensity. The possible scores on the NPRS range from zero representing no pain to 10 representing the worst imaginable pain. The NPRS will be administered verbally, and each participant will be asked to rate their pain intensity at present (i.e. current pain level). | Change from baseline at two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks post intervention. | |
Primary | Change on disability level | Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OSW) to determine participants perceived disability level due to low back pain. The OSW is a self-reported ordinal scale measure that consists of 10 items assessing different aspects of pain and function related to the patient's LBP. Each item is scored on a six-point scale (0 to 5), with five representing the highest level of disability. The scores of the 10 items are then summed, with a maximum possible sum of 50 points. To obtain a percentage score, the sum is multiplied by two. Participants will be asked to use the OSW to rate their perceived level of disability at present. | Change from baseline at two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks post intervention. | |
Secondary | Fear-avoidance beliefs | To assess participants' beliefs regarding the effect of physical and work-related activities on their current LBP. The FABQ consists of 16 items and each item is scored on a seven-point Likert scale from zero (completely disagree) to six (completely agree), whereby higher scores indicate greater levels of fear-avoidance beliefs. This questionnaire comprises two independent subscales: the physical activity subscale which has five items (items1-5), and work subscale with eleven items (items 6-16). The participant should answer all items; however, for each subscale, not all items are included in the scoring. For scoring purposes, four items of the physical activity subscale are scored, with a possible score ranging from 0 to 24 points. Seven items of the work subscale are scored with a possible score ranging from 0 to 42 points. The five remaining FABQ items are not included in the score. | at baseline and will be used for descriptive purposes only. | |
Secondary | Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) | To characterize a range of participants' traits at baseline. The PROMIS-29 is a general health-related quality of life measure that assesses seven health domains: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. Each of the seven domains has four questions which are scored on a five-point Likert scale. In addition, pain intensity is measured with a single item on an 11-point numeric scale (NPRS) that ranges from 0 to 10. The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method available at the Assessment Center? website (http://assessmentcenter.net). Normative values have been reported for each domain of the PROMIS. As such, a score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores mean more of the specific scale's construct, which may indicate a desirable or an undesirable outcome. | at baseline and will be used for descriptive purposes only. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|