Wet Cupping (AlHijamah); Double Versus Single Cupping Technique

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of double (traditional) versus single (Asian) cupping techniques in chronic low back pain.

Clinical Trial Description

Chronic Low Back Pain is a very common pain disorder in the primary care. As in many chronic pain conditions, patients are usually asking for alternative options, especially local traditional and therapies including wet cupping, to replace the long-term use of painkillers. The majority of the wet cupping trials conducted abroad used different techniques, which is different from our local traditional wet cupping technique. This study can identify the technique that is more efficacious in reducing pain, prolonging the pain relieve period, and decrease patient dependence on painkillers in chronic low back pain.The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of double (traditional) versus single (Asian) cupping techniques in chronic low back pain. This a randomized comparative effectiveness pilot clinical trial. After taking written informed consent, patient with chronic low back pain will be randomized into two groups, one group to receive wet cupping therapy with the Traditional double technique, the other group to receive it with the Asian single technique. Numeric Rating Scale, Present Pain Intensity and Oswestry Disability Questionnaire will be used to measure the outcome before and after the intervention, one week after the intervention, then two weeks after. Wilcoxon rank sum test for the continuous dependent data analysis and the analysis of covariance ANCOVA, to compare both groups mean scores will be used. The outcome baseline for each score will be used as the covariate. Chi square or Fisher's exact test will be used to compare categorical data with Minimal Clinical Improvement Difference within and between the two groups. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT02631382
Study type	Interventional
Source	National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Saudi Arabia
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	November 2015
Completion date	May 2016

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT03916705` - Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility	N/A
Completed	`NCT04007302` - Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago	N/A
Completed	`NCT03273114` - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03600207` - The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT04284982` - Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05600543` - Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT05410366` - Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
Completed	`NCT03673436` - Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
Completed	`NCT02546466` - Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT00983385` - Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT05156242` - Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04673773` - MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.	N/A
Completed	`NCT06049251` - ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises	N/A
Completed	`NCT06049277` - Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT04980469` - A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle	N/A
Completed	`NCT04055545` - High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05944354` - Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
Recruiting	`NCT05552248` - Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
Completed	`NCT05801588` - Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life	N/A
Completed	`NCT05811143` - Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.