Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02513173
Other study ID # TWU17581
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date January 2014
Est. completion date January 2015

Study information

Verified date July 2015
Source Texas Woman's University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Segmental stabilization exercise has been shown to be effective in the rehabilitation of low back pain (LBP). Due to the isometric nature of segmental stabilization exercise, manual therapists use various verbal instructions to elicit lumbar multifidus muscle contraction. The purpose of this study was to assess whether or not three verbal instructions would alter muscle thickness of the lumbar multifidus differently in asymptomatic individuals and patients with LBP. Three verbal instructions were selected for this study: (1) swell the muscle underneath the transducer, (2) draw your belly button in towards your spinal column, and (3) think about tilting your pelvis but without really doing it. Lumbar multifidus muscle thickness was determined using parasagittal ultrasound imaging. Measurements of muscle thickness were collected at rest and during verbal instructions from 21 asymptomatic adults and 21 patients with LBP. Percent changes of muscle thickness during contraction and at rest were compared between groups and across verbal instructions.


Description:

Participants: Eligible participants were English-speaking adults 18 years of age or older. Additional criteria for asymptomatic healthy adults included no existing low back pain (LBP) and no LBP in the past year. Additional criteria for patient participants included existing LBP near the L5-S1 level with an average pain intensity score ≥ 2/10 (numeric pain rating scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain). Exclusion criteria for all participants included previous low back surgery, systemic joint disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis), cancer of the lower quadrant, neurological disorders, allergic reaction to ultrasound gel, or inability to obtain testing positions (prone lying). After participants were informed of the risks, benefits and procedures of the study, they were asked to sign a written consent form approved by the TWU Institutional Review Board - Dallas. Eligible participants were asked to complete an intake form, asking them about their age, gender, and past medical history. For participants with existing LBP, they were asked about their pain location, duration, intensity, and nature of their existing LBP and their LBP history. The height and body weight of each participant were taken to determine the body mass index (BMI). BMI has been shown to be a factor affecting muscle size. Instrumentation: 1. The Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Index (OSW) questionnaire was used to determine an individual's perceived disability and function limitation due to his/her low back pain. The OSW questionnaire has been shown to be reliable and valid. 2. A Sonosite M-Turbo ultrasound scanner (Sonosite, Inc., Bothell, WA) was used to measure muscle size of the lumbar multifidus. A curvilinear transducer (3-5 MHz) will be used to take transverse images of segmental lumbar multifidus at the L5-S1 segment. If the patient has multiple painful segments, the most painful segment will be imaged. The most common painful segments are L4-5 or L5-S1 in patients with LBP. 3. The ImageJ software (free download from the NIH website) was used to determine muscle thickness off-line. US Image Acquisition: Participants was lying in prone on an examination table with their arms on the sides. A pillow was placed under the participant's abdomen to flatten the lumbar lordotic curve and an inclinometer was placed on the lumbosacral junction to ensure the lumbar curve ≤10. The right side of asymptomatic healthy adults and the painful side of patients with low back pain were imaged. The spinous processes of the right L5-S1 or the painful segment were identified by palpation and marked with an erasable pen. Next, the spinous process was verified using US imaging. Transverse images of the segmental multifidus muscle were captured by placing the transducer horizontally on the spinous process of the target segment. The transverse image of segmental lumbar multifidus was taken 3 times "at rest" and 3 times during muscle activations of the lumbar multifidus. Activation of lumbar multifidus was achieved by asking participants to generate a slow gentle sustained (isometric) contraction of the lumbar multifidus using 3 different verbal instructions without moving their spine or pelvis. Participants held each contraction for 3-5 seconds. The order of 3 verbal instructions was given in a random order to minimize the learning and fatigue effects. Therefore, each participant performed a total of 9 lumbar multifidus muscle contractions during each testing session. Prior to taking ultrasound images, the anatomy and location of the lumbar multifidus muscle were explained and shown to participants using a model and pictures. Next, the following 3 verbal instructions were used to generate a multifidus contraction: Breathe in and out and: 1. Without moving your spine, try to "swell" the muscle underneath the transducer. 2. Without moving your spine, draw your spinal column in toward your belly button. 3. Attempt to elongate your spine by drawing the muscles in your back up toward your head. All participants were asked to return one week later, the procedure was repeated. The order of verbal instructions also was randomized in the 2nd session.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 42
Est. completion date January 2015
Est. primary completion date January 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - additional criteria for asymptomatic healthy adults include no existing LBP and no LBP in the past year. - additional criteria for patient participants include existing LBP near the L5-S1 level with an average pain intensity score = 2/10 (numeric pain rating scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain). Exclusion Criteria: - previous low back surgery, - systemic joint disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis), - cancer of the lower quadrant, - neurological disorders, - allergic reaction to ultrasound gel, or - inability to obtain testing positions (prone lying).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Texas Woman's University

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Ultrasonographic muscle thickness measurement of lumbar multifidus Muscle thickness of lumbar multifidus was measured at rest and during contraction under each of 3 verbal instructions on two visits with an average of one week apart. Participants were measured and then followed-up one week later
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03916705 - Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility N/A
Completed NCT04007302 - Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT03600207 - The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT04284982 - Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05600543 - Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain N/A
Withdrawn NCT05410366 - Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
Completed NCT03673436 - Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
Completed NCT02546466 - Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT00983385 - Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05156242 - Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. N/A
Recruiting NCT04673773 - MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain. N/A
Completed NCT06049277 - Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT06049251 - ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises N/A
Completed NCT04980469 - A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle N/A
Completed NCT04055545 - High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects N/A
Recruiting NCT05552248 - Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
Recruiting NCT05944354 - Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
Completed NCT05801588 - Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life N/A
Completed NCT05811143 - Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.