Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Clinical Efficacy and Safety Study of Tramadol Hydrochloride - Paracetamol Tablets in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acute Neck-shoulder Pain and Low Back Pain in Orthopaedics Outpatient or Emergency Setting
Verified date | June 2013 |
Source | Xian-Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | China: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol hydrochloride-paracetamol tablets in treatment of moderate (medium level of seriousness) to severe (very serious) acute neck, shoulder and low back pain in orthopedics (pertaining to the bones) outpatient or emergency setting.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 1059 |
Est. completion date | May 2008 |
Est. primary completion date | May 2008 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Intermittent or persistent pain for less than 3 months, required analgesic therapy, orthopedic surgery and emergency call participants suffering with severe neck, shoulder, low back pain or chronic neck, shoulder, lower back pain, acute (a quick and severe form of illness in its early stage) exacerbation pain - Pain intensity to be assessed using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), NRS score more than or equal to 4 (from 0 to 10, 0 = no pain, 10 = extreme pain) - During normal pain and stable feeling, can study pain assessment methods and can fill in pain control diary - Be willing to participate in the study and must give written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Have used strong opium kind of medication 7 days prior to the enrolment - Have severe mental disease or using antipsychotic (agent that control agitated psychotic behavior, alleviate acute psychotic states, reduce psychotic symptoms, and exert a quieting effect) medication for medical treatment - Drug abuse/dependence, or chronic alcohol abuse/depend on history - Pregnant or lactating women - Unable to tolerate tramadol or any failed treatment in past by using tramadol - Comparatively more severe pain in other parts of the body than that of the pain mentioned in the research |
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Xian-Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd. |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Pain Intensity Score Based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Hour 0.5 | Pain intensity was measured using NRS (0=painless and 10=most severe pain). Score of 1-3 means mild pain; 4-6 means moderate pain and 7-10 means severe pain. | Hour 0.5 | No |
Primary | Pain Intensity Score Based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Hour 1 | Pain intensity was measured using NRS (0=painless and 10=most severe pain). Score of 1-3 means mild pain; 4-6 means moderate pain and 7-10 means severe pain. | Hour 1 | No |
Primary | Pain Intensity Score Based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Hour 2 | Pain intensity was measured using NRS (0=painless and 10=most severe pain). Score of 1-3 means mild pain; 4-6 means moderate pain and 7-10 means severe pain. | Hour 2 | No |
Primary | Pain Intensity Score Based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Hour 3 | Pain intensity was measured using NRS (0=painless and 10=most severe pain). Score of 1-3 means mild pain; 4-6 means moderate pain and 7-10 means severe pain. | Hour 3 | No |
Primary | Pain Intensity Score Based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Hour 4 | Pain intensity was measured using NRS (0=painless and 10=most severe pain). Score of 1-3 means mild pain; 4-6 means moderate pain and 7-10 means severe pain. | Hour 4 | No |
Primary | Pain Intensity Score Based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Hour 6 | Pain intensity was measured using NRS (0=painless and 10=most severe pain). Score of 1-3 means mild pain; 4-6 means moderate pain and 7-10 means severe pain. | Hour 6 | No |
Primary | Number of Participants With Pain Relief Score at Hour 0.5 | Pain relief was measured using 6-point Likert Scale (4=complete, 3=significant/comparatively large, 2=moderate, 1=mild/slight, 0=none, -1=exacerbated/heavier). | Hour 0.5 | No |
Primary | Number of Participants With Pain Relief Score at Hour 1 | Pain relief was measured using 6-point Likert Scale (4=complete, 3=significant/comparatively large, 2=moderate, 1=mild/slight, 0=none, -1=exacerbated/heavier). | Hour 1 | No |
Primary | Number of Participants With Pain Relief Score at Hour 2 | Pain relief was measured using 6-point Likert Scale (4=complete, 3=significant/comparatively large, 2=moderate, 1=mild/slight, 0=none, -1=exacerbated/heavier). | Hour 2 | No |
Primary | Number of Participants With Pain Relief Score at Hour 3 | Pain relief was measured using 6-point Likert Scale (4=complete, 3=significant/comparatively large, 2=moderate, 1=mild/slight, 0=none, -1=exacerbated/heavier). | Hour 3 | No |
Primary | Number of Participants With Pain Relief Score at Hour 4 | Pain relief was measured using 6-point Likert Scale (4=complete, 3=significant/comparatively large, 2=moderate, 1=mild/slight, 0=none, -1=exacerbated/heavier). | Hour 4 | No |
Primary | Number of Participants With Pain Relief Score at Hour 6 | Pain relief was measured using 6-point Likert Scale (4=complete, 3=significant/comparatively large, 2=moderate, 1=mild/slight, 0=none, -1=exacerbated/heavier). | Hour 6 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants Who Required Additional Dosage Administration | Number of participants who additionally required a second tablet within 2 hours after the first administration of the investigational drug was reported. | Baseline up to Hour 2 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Analgesic Satisfaction Score | Participants evaluated their satisfaction with the analgesic effect of the study drug using a 4-point scale (4=very good, 3=good, 2=average, 1=poor). Number of participants in each category was reported. | Hour 6 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Overall Analgesic Satisfaction Score | Participants and physicians separately evaluated their satisfaction with the analgesic effect of the study drug using a 5-point scale (1=very unsatisfied, 2 =unsatisfied, 3=average, 4= satisfied and 5=very satisfied). Number of participants in each category was reported. | Hour 6 | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|