Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized-Withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) at 30 to 90 mg Every 12 Hours for Relief of Moderate to Severe Pain in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time
| Verified date | June 2017 |
| Source | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets at doses of 30 to 90 mg every 12 hours compared with placebo in alleviating moderate to severe pain in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients may be opioid-naïve or opioid-experienced.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 625 |
| Est. completion date | February 2014 |
| Est. primary completion date | February 2014 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - The patient has had moderate to severe chronic low back pain for at least 3 months duration before screening. - The patient is able to speak English and is willing to provide written informed consent, including a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study. - The patient is willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, complete the electronic diary, and return to the study center for scheduled study visits, as specified in the protocol. - The patient is 18 through 80 years of age at the time of screening. - Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal) must use a medically accepted method of contraception, agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening. - Acceptable methods of contraception include barrier method with spermicide, intrauterine device (IUD), or steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected) in conjunction with a barrier method. NOTE: A woman will be considered surgically sterile if she has had a tubal ligation, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. - Other criteria apply. Exclusion Criteria: - The patient is taking a total of more than 135 mg/day of oxycodone, or equivalent, during the 14 days before screening. - The patient's primary painful condition under study is related to any source of chronic pain other than low back pain. - The patient has radicular (nerve compression) pain or another type of purely neuropathic pain. - The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to any ingredient in the study drug. - The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse, with the exception of nicotine. - The patient has medical or psychiatric disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data. - Other criteria apply. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10415 | Altoona | Pennsylvania |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10358 | Anaheim | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10416 | Anniston | Alabama |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10405 | Austin | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10418 | Avon | Indiana |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10388 | Bay City | Michigan |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10408 | Bell Gardens | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10420 | Bellevue | Washington |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10409 | Berlin | New Jersey |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10397 | Biloxi | Mississippi |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10382 | Birmingham | Alabama |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10403 | Birmingham | Alabama |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10412 | Birmingham | Alabama |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10439 | Buffalo | New York |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10425 | Carmichael | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10390 | Cerritos | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10411 | Chicago | Illinois |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10432 | Columbus | Georgia |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10364 | Dallas | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10372 | Dallas | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10395 | Dallas | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10369 | DeLand | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10430 | Duncansville | Pennsylvania |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10744 | Edgewater | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10429 | El Cajon | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10423 | Escondido | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10380 | Evansville | Indiana |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10433 | Everett | Washington |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10389 | Fall River | Massachusetts |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10379 | Fort Lauderdale | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10740 | Garden Grove | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10406 | Hazelwood | Missouri |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10417 | Henderson | Nevada |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10371 | Houston | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 12035 | Houston | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10391 | Huntington Park | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10365 | Jacksonville | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10422 | La Jolla | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10413 | Laguna Hills | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10442 | Laguna Hills | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10377 | Lake Jackson | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10399 | Las Vegas | Nevada |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10445 | Leesburg | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10370 | Los Angeles | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10383 | Marietta | Georgia |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10385 | Marietta | Georgia |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10386 | Mechanicsburg | Pennsylvania |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10431 | Meridian | Idaho |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10743 | Meridian | Idaho |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10426 | Mobile | Alabama |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10436 | Montgomery | Alabama |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10419 | New Orleans | Louisiana |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10394 | New York | New York |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10407 | New York | New York |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10410 | New York | New York |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10440 | Newburgh | Indiana |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10444 | Newnan | Georgia |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10404 | North Charleston | South Carolina |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10446 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10376 | Omaha | Nebraska |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10396 | Omaha | Nebraska |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10362 | Orlando | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10381 | Ormond Beach | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10375 | Overland Park | Kansas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 12036 | Pembroke Pines | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10363 | Phoenix | Arizona |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10366 | Phoenix | Arizona |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10374 | Plano | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10357 | Plantation | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10443 | Raleigh | North Carolina |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10438 | Roanoke | Virginia |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10367 | Royal Palm Beach | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10435 | Royal Palm Beach | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10401 | Saint Louis | Missouri |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10402 | Salt Lake City | Utah |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10378 | San Antonio | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10742 | Sanford | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10392 | Sherman Oaks | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10359 | Shreveport | Louisiana |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10741 | Spartanburg | South Carolina |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10398 | Thousand Oaks | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10373 | Tipton | Pennsylvania |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10428 | Torrance | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10437 | Tucson | Arizona |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10361 | Walnut Creek | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10441 | Waterbury | Connecticut |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10414 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc. |
United States,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Treatment Period in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) | The WPI was recorded daily by participants in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. Participants selected the number that best described their worst pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Weekly WPI scores averaged daily scores collected over the previous 7 days for each analysis visit. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in pain control. The analysis included WPI data observed before discontinuation of study drug and was based on the multiple imputations (MI) method to handle missing scores at week 12. Consistent with the recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report (Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials 2010), the MI method includes an assumption of missing at random (MAR) and takes into account a potential bias toward the active-drug treatment group for patients who discontinued study drug because of adverse events. |
Days -6 to 0 of Treatment Period (baseline), Week 12 of Treatment Period | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Treatment Period in Weekly Average Pain Intensity (API) | The API over the last 24 hours was recorded daily by patients in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. Participants selected the number that best described the average pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Weekly API scores averaged daily scores collected over the previous 7 days for each analysis visit. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in pain control. The analysis included API data observed before discontinuation of study drug and was based on the MI method to handle missing scores at week 12. Consistent with the recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report (Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials 2010), the MI method includes an assumption of missing at random (MAR) and takes into account a potential bias toward the active-drug treatment group for patients who discontinued study drug because of adverse events. |
Days -6 to 0 of Treatment Period (baseline), Week 12 | |
| Secondary | Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Loss of Efficacy | Time to loss of efficacy was defined as discontinuation of study drug for lack of efficacy or the start of excessive rescue medication while taking study drug. Excessive rescue medication usage was defined as 10 or more days of rescue medication usage in any 14 consecutive days at a total of 15 mg (hydrocodone-equivalent) or higher each day during the post 2-week tapering period of the double-blind treatment period. | Day 1 to Week 12 of Treatment Period | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a 30% or Greater Increase in Weekly Average Pain Intensity (API) From Baseline to Week 12 Visit, and an Average API Score of 5 or Higher at Week 12 | The API over the last 24 hours was recorded daily by participants in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. Participants selected the number that best described the average pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Weekly API scores averaged daily scores collected over the previous 7 days for each analysis visit. | Days -6 to 0 of Treatment Period (baseline), Week 12 | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Final On-Treatment Visit in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Score | The RMDQ is a patient-rated, 24-question evaluation used to assess acute disability associated with low back pain. Each question is answered with a YES or NO response, and each YES response is given 1 point. Scores on the RMDQ range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in level of disability. | Days 7-14 of Titration Period (baseline), Week 12 or end of study visit during the Treatment Period | |
| Secondary | Participants With Adverse Events During Open-Label Titration and Double-Blind Treatment Periods | An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. | Day 1 of Titration Period up to Week 12 of Treatment Period (maximum treatment duration was 127 days) | |
| Secondary | Participants With Clinically Significant Hearing Changes From Baseline to Final Assessment in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results | Pure tone audiometry was performed by a qualified audiologist and was not done at the study center. During the test, the patient wore headphones and was seated in a quiet room; trained personnel manipulated the audiometry equipment to test the patient's hearing. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant (CS) hearing change were based on the guidance from the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) 1994 (Konrad-Martin et al 2005). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to "no response" at 3 consecutive test frequencies. | Days 7-14 of Titration Period (baseline), Day 0 of Treatment Period (last day of Titration Period), Week 12 or end of study visit during the Treatment Period | |
| Secondary | Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scales (SOWS) Total Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Period | The results of the SOWS were collected in the e-diary daily during the first 4 weeks of the double blind treatment period and then during clinic visits at week 12 or early termination. The SOWS was a self-administered questionnaire used to measure a participant's signs and symptoms of withdrawal from opiates. The scale contained 16 symptoms (such as my nose is running; I feel restless), the participant rated the intensity on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for a total score of 0-64. The daily total score for the first 4 weeks was the largest score observed during the time period preceding that visit. For example, the week 1 score for each participant was the largest total score on any day between baseline and the night before the week 1 visit; the week 4 score for each participant was the largest score observed between the week 2 visit and the night before the week 4 visit. | Weeks 1, 2, 4 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period | |
| Secondary | Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scales (COWS) Total Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Period | COWS is a clinician-rated scale used to measure a participant's signs and symptoms of withdrawal from opiates, with ratings based only on apparent relationship to withdrawal. The COWS was performed at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12 (double blind treatment period) or early termination. The scale contained 11 signs/symptoms whose intensity the clinician rated on a scale of 0 to 4 or 5. A total score was calculated as the sum of the responses to the 11 signs/symptoms for a total range of 0-48. Withdrawal severity was classified, based on the total score, as follows: 0 to 4=normal 5 to 12=mild 13 to 24=moderate 25 to 36=moderately severe 36=severe |
Weeks 1, 2, 4 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period | |
| Secondary | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Double-Blind Treatment Period | Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values. Significance criteria: Blood urea nitrogen: >=10.71 mmol/L Creatinine: >=177 µmol/L Uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 µmol/L Alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >=3* upper limit of normal (ULN) Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT): >=3* upper limit of normal (ULN) Serum white blood cells: <=3.0 * 10^9/L Hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL Hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L Eosinophils: >=10.0 % Absolute neutrophils: <=1.0 * 10^9/L Urinalysis: Glucose: >=2 unit increase from baseline |
Day 1 up to Week 12 of the Treatment Period | |
| Secondary | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Sign Values During the Double-Blind Treatment Period | Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values. Significance criteria Pulse - high: >=120 and increase of >= 15 beats/minute from baseline Pulse - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 beats/minute Systolic blood pressure - high: >=180 and increase >=20 mmHg Systolic blood pressure - low: <=90 and decrease >=20 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure - high: >=105 and increase of >=15 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 mmHg |
Day 1 to Week 12 of the Treatment Period | |
| Secondary | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram Findings During the Double-Blind Treatment Period | Data represents the number of participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) electrocardiogram findings on the final study visit. | Final study visit (week 12 or end of treatment visit) |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
| Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
| Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|