Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
STUDY OF THE EFFICACY OF NEUROLYSIS IN FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY FROM CHRONIC NONSPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN
Verified date | March 2013 |
Source | University of Sao Paulo |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Brasil: Institutional Review Board IOT USP |
Study type | Interventional |
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In an initial
phase, 100 patients with chronic low back pain will be included in this study. The patients
will be recruited through magazines and newspapers to take part in a screening for treatment
of low back pain. This screening will involve the evaluation of data such as history and
physical examination to classify the patient in the group of nonspecific low back pain,
excluding patients with neurological alterations and the so-called Red-Flags.
Procedures After the initial screening the patients will undergo diagnostic blocks of the
medial branch of lumbar vertebrae L2, L3, L4 , L5 and of the first sacral vertebra (S1) with
lidocaine and control with distilled water. The patients that present more than 50% of pain
improvement, evaluated by the Likert scale after 30 minutes will form the study group, while
the patients that do not present pain improvement with lidocaine or that present pain
improvement with distilled water will be excluded.
The medial branch block consists of the insertion of a 90mm, 25-gauge needle through the
skin with radioscopic control up to the medial branch topography. Infusion of 1ml of 2%
lidocaine should be performed in each medial branch of the abovementioned vertebrae. Control
is executed in the same manner yet with infusion of 1ml of distilled water.
Through the use of the diagnostic block we will have 40 patients selected for the second
phase of the study. Once defined the study group should be evaluated before the procedure
through the Oswestry, Roland Morris, SF-36 and VAS questionnaires.
In the second phase of the study the patients will be randomized. The random division into
two groups will be performed through a computerized program of random numbers. The
randomization result will be kept in matt sealed envelopes to guarantee secrecy of the
allocation. The neurolysis procedure will be carried out in the first group, consisting of
20 patients, and the placebo or sham procedure with the second group, also with 20 patients.
The neurolysis procedure will be carried out under sterile conditions, with the patient
lying prone and with the neurotome insertion sites anesthetized with 2ml of 1% lidocaine.
The neurotome (Smith & Nephew - RF) will be used for the procedure. The neurotome is a
radiofrequency apparatus mounted on a 10cm electrode type 22 needle with a 5mm exposure tip.
The neurotome should be introduced percutaneously in a manner similar to that adopted in the
medial branch block through radioscopic control. The temperature of the electrode after its
placement in the correct position is then raised to 80 °C for 90 seconds. Two neurotomies
should be performed for each facet, one proximally and the other distally, due to double
innervation of each facet. In the patients of the placebo group the procedure will be the
same only the temperature of the neurotome will not be raised. This will be performed in a
blind manner, as before starting the procedure, the surgeon will show the assistant who
turns the device on or not the envelope containing the patient's group (placebo or
neurotomy), yet the surgeon will not be informed whether the device has been turned on or
not, having to perform the procedure in the same manner in both groups.
The patients will then be reevaluated in the first month, 3 months after, 6 months after and
12 months after the procedure. The assessors will not be informed of the group to which the
patient belongs, and the same scales performed in the preoperative period will be used here.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | July 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | July 2012 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - clinical diagnosis of lumbar pain in a patient with age between 20 and 60 years. - present clinical complaints of low back pain for 3 months or more. - present pain of moderate to severe intensity: visual analogue scale (VAS) > 4. Exclusion Criteria: - patients that develop a profile compatible with specific low back pain during treatment. - patients that request their withdrawal from the study at any time. - patients that develop an allergy to the medication used. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the U.S.P | Sao Paulo | SP |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Sao Paulo |
Brazil,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Pain Evaluation | Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale | The Patients will be evaluated 1 week before surgery | No |
Primary | Pain Evaluation | Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale | The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery | No |
Primary | Pain Evaluation | Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale | The Patients will be evaluated three months after surgery | No |
Primary | Pain Evaluation | Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale | The Patients will be evaluated six months after surgery | No |
Primary | Pain Evaluation | Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale | The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery | No |
Secondary | Disability evaluation | The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life. | The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery | No |
Secondary | Medial Block Improvement | likert five-level scale is a scale for evaluation of improvement: 0-30% improvement - no improvement 30-50% improvement - moderate improvement 50-80% improvement - good improvement 80-100% improvement - no pain to evaluate the improvement after the medial branch block |
one day after the medial branch block | No |
Secondary | Health Status | The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale. | The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery | No |
Secondary | Disability evaluation | The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life. | The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery | No |
Secondary | Disability evaluation | The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life. | The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery | No |
Secondary | Disability evaluation | The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life. | The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery | No |
Secondary | Disability evaluation | The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life. | The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery | No |
Secondary | Health Status | The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale. | The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery | No |
Secondary | Health Status | The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale. | The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery | No |
Secondary | Health Status | The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale. | The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery | No |
Secondary | Health Status | The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale. | The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|