Local Anesthetic Complication Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effect of Adding Sodium Bicarbonate 8.4% to Local Anesthesia on Pain During Upper Canine Infiltration: A Crossover Clinical Trial.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pain during local anesthetic buccal infiltration for the maxillary canines after adding Sodium Bicarbonate 8.4% during local anesthesia.
Materials and Methods The present research was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the College of Dentistry at Al Wataniya Private University (M/45- 14.1.2023). 30 healthy patients were recruited, aged between 15-50 years, and divided into two groups (15 males and 15 females). Every patient had to meet the following conditions: - Caries free with no restorations, periapical lesions, or history of trauma at the site of injection. - Willingness to participate in the study and ability to describe and evaluate their pain. - No painkillers, or sedatives taken for at least 24 hours so that pain assessment isn't affected. - No allergy to local anesthetics. - No pregnancy. Each patient received buccal infiltration with the anesthetic solution alone at one upper canine site and local anesthetic with added sodium bicarbonate at the other site. The local anesthetic used was 2% Lidocaine with 1:80.000 Epinephrine produced by New-Stetic S.A.- Colombia. Whereas 8.4% Bicarbonate Sodium was produced by TCE - UK. Injections were performed using 25 mm short needles (Gauge 27) manufactured by C-K Dental - South Korea. Consent for each patient was obtained before the clinical session. Local infiltration was performed using a one-third cartridge (0.6 mL) of the local anesthetic on one side and local anesthetic with added Sodium Bicarbonate on the counterpart side leaving 5 minutes between the injections. Alkalinization of the local anesthetic was performed using the technique described by Saatchi et al13. 0.2 mL of the anesthetic solution was extracted using a tuberculin syringe and then discarded. 0.2 mL sodium bicarbonate was then loaded and added to the cartridge. Afterward, the solution was slowly shaken 20 times and ready to be administered with a cartridge syringe. The 100 mm Visual Analog Scale VAS was utilized as the most commonly used assessment tool to determine the severity of the pain14 where 0 indicates that the patient does not feel pain, while 10 points to unbearable severe pain. The patients must rely on their own experience to confirm the pain's severity. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05432934 -
Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks With and Without Dexamethasone
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06025825 -
Comparative Effect of Palatal Injection in Pediatric Patient
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06171243 -
PK of Lidocaine/Tetracaine and PD Derived From a New Topical Formulation for Treatment of Neuropathic Pain.
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04812639 -
Buccal Infiltration Technique Compared to Inferior Alveolar Technique
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06193460 -
Evaluation of the Anti-anaesthetic Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Children's Soft Tissue
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05233462 -
Height Adjusted Versus Standardized Dose of Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04258436 -
Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Management of Post Thoracotomy Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04821245 -
Defining Normal Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05864664 -
Safety and Efficacy of Wide Awake Local Anesthesia no Tourniquet Technique (WALANT) in Ankle Removal of Implant Surgery
|
N/A |