Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT04494542 |
| Other study ID # |
ILBS-Cirrhosis-36 |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Completed |
| Phase |
N/A
|
| First received |
|
| Last updated |
|
| Start date |
October 16, 2020 |
| Est. completion date |
May 16, 2023 |
Study information
| Verified date |
November 2023 |
| Source |
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India |
| Contact |
n/a |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The current prospective pliot randomized controlled trial has been designed to demonstrate
non-inferiority of sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) when compared to continuous renal
replacement therapy in managing AKI in context of cirrhotics with septic shock who are
hemodynamically unstable. The patients would be randomized 1:1 to either SLED or CRRT after
screening for the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Description:
Aim & Objectives
Primary objective To study the efficacy of sustained low efficiency dialysis versus
continuous renal replacement therapy in cirrhotics with septic shock and severe AKI
Secondary Objectives Effects on renal recovery rates in the two groups To assess the effects
on 7-day and 28-day mortality Efficacy on Lactate Clearance Duration of mechanical
ventilation and ICU stay Effect on systemic hemodynamics and reversal of shock Clearance of
endotoxin and pro-inflammatory cytokines Effect on coagulation and endothelial function
Improvement in SOFA scores at 48 hours and day 5
Methodology All included patients would be randomised to receive either continuous renal
replacement therapy or sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) Patients with septic shock
would be screened. Following this, patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will
be screened and randomized to the two treatment groups. Standard criteria will be considered
to define refractoriness to fluids and initiation of dialysis. Fluid management would be
performed using the dynamic indices in patients on mechanical ventilation or using IVC
diameter and passive-leg rasing in non-intubated patients. In all patients, baseline
endotoxin activity assay and blood and urine sample will be stored for looking at the effect
of therapy on cytokine profile (TNF alpha, IL-IB, IL6, IFN-gamma, MCP-1, IL-10 and ADAMTS and
vWillebrand factor). Septic shock would be defined as a clinical construct of sepsis with
persisting hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain MAP>=65 mm of Hg and having a serum
lactate >2 mmol/L despite adequate volume resuscitation. The blood flow rate, dialysis flow
rate and need of ultrafiltration would be recorded for all enrolled patients. Subsequent
sessions of therapy would be done as per requirement and recorded. The dose of vasopressor in
norepinephrine equivalent would be recorded for all patients at enrolment as under
Study Population:
Patients with cirrhosis with septic shock and AKI requiring dialysis
Indications for initiation of dialysis
1. Metabolic acidosis with ph<7.2 or serum bicarbonate <15 mEq/lt
2. Hyperkalemia with serum potassium >5.5 Meq/L non-responsive to standard treatment
3. Oliguria with or without fluid overload (non-responsive to diuretics) with urine output
of less than 0.5ml/kg/hr despite fluid resuscitation
4. Uremic complications (encephalopathy, pericarditis etc.)
Study Design:
- A randomized controlled study- Non-inferiority trial
- The study will be conducted on patients admitted to Department of Hepatology from June
2020 to December 2020 at ILBS, New Delhi
- Study group will comprise critically ill patients with cirrhosis with septic shock and
AKI requiring dialysis
Study Period: The study will be conducted on patients admitted to Department of Hepatology
from May 2020 to December 2020 at ILBS, New Delhi
Sample Size Calculation: The study will be designed as a pilot RCT with an aim to enrol 25
patients in each group. At completion a decision for termination versus continuation of the
study would be taken.
Intervention: CRRT versus SLED until renal recovery
Renal recovery would be defined as increase in urine output to more than 400ml/day in
patients with anuria, resolution of metabolic complications or spontaneous decline in urea
and creatinine necessitating stopping dialytic support
Monitoring and Assessment: Hourly till the patient is in the intensive care then every 7 days
until day 28
Statistical analysis
- All variables shall be expressed in mean (sd) or median (range)
- Variables will be compared by Mann- Whitney U test
- For Categorical variables we will use Chi-Square or Fisher's test
- Survival analysis will be done using Cox-proportional regression analysis
Actuarial probability of survival shall be calculated by Kaplan- Meier graph and compared by
log- rank test.
Adverse Effects: Worsening of hypotension, bleeding any cardiac side-effects, worsening
lactate, hypothermia, bradycardia
Stopping Rule: clinically relevant bleeding (i.e., transfusion requirements of at least 2
units of packed red cells), arrythmias (brady or tachyarryhthmias), poorly tolerated
supraventricular arrhythmia related blood stream infections, development of electrolyte
abnormalities hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia or hypomagnesemia refractory to medical
management, renal recovery