View clinical trials related to Liver Cirrhosis.
Filter by:Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer. Patients with HCCs usually have a poor prognosis. Hepatocarcinogenesis is an intricate and multistep process. Detecting and staging early HCC in patients with liver cirrhosis are still challenging for imaging techniques. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) are widely used in clinical practice. EOB-MRI has advantages of high detecting rate for small lesions, high sensitivity of hepatobiliary phase and extensive image information. Sonazoid has the advantage of offering a unique post-vascular phase, also called the Kupffer phase. Therefore, malignant tumors with few or no Kupffer cells appear as contrast defects, with respect to the relatively well-enhanced surrounding liver in the postvascular phase. The diagnostic efficacies of these two imaging methods have not been well studied. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the efficacies of Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI in patients with high risk of HCC, and to compare the detection ability for malignant tumors by Kupffer phase and hepatobiliary phase.
A multi-center evaluation of aldafermin in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in subjects with compensated cirrhosis.
Variceal bleeding (VB) is a life-threatening complication of cirrhosis with a 6-week mortality of approximately 15%-20%. The 1-year rate of recurrent VB is approximately 60% in patients without prophylaxis treatment. Therefore, all patients who survive VB must receive active treatments to prevent rebleeding. Usually, these patients are submitted to rebleeding prophylaxis with endoscopic band ligation (EBL) combined with non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are reserved for those who failed endoscopic plus medical treatment. A recent meta-analysis comparing combination therapy to monotherapy with EBL or drug therapy has demonstrated that combination therapy is only marginally more effective than NSBB alone. This suggests that NSBB is the cornerstone of combination therapy. The lowest rebleeding rates are observed in patients on secondary prophylaxis who are hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) responders (defined as a reduction in HVPG below 12 mm Hg or > 20% from baseline). A recent study demonstrated that patients who have their first episode of variceal bleeding while on primary prophylaxis with NSBB have an increased risk of further bleeding and death, despite adding EBL. These patients possibly require alternative treatment approaches, such as TIPS. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of TIPS vs. EBL + NSBB for the prevention of rebleeding in NSBB non-responder for primary prophylaxis.
The aim is to evaluate the levels of oxysterols and especially 4beta-hydroxycholesterol in patients with liver cirrhosis. Three cirrhosis cohorts are recruited: patients treated with spironolactone, patients treated with rifaximin, patients without spironolactone or rifaximin. Also three other control cohorts are recruited: patients with pneumonia, patients with Crohn's disease, patients with ulcerative colitis. The effect of the cirrhosis and its medications spironolactone and rifaximin are compared to control groups.
Gastric varices (GV) are present in around 20% of patients with cirrhosis. Bleeding from GV accounts for 10-20% of all variceal bleeding. For the prevention of gastric variceal bleeding, TIPS or BRTO as firstline treatments were suggested. No randomized trials have compared BRTO with other therapies. BRTO and its variations might increase portal pressure and might worsen complications, such as ascites or bleeding from EV. In this regard, if NSBB is combined with BRTO and its variations (we called interventional devascularization) for those HVPG responders, the drawbacks of interventional devascularization might be overcome. Therefore, the investigators conducted this RCT to compare the effectiveness and safety of TIPS with those of interventional devascularization in the prevention of rebleeding from gastric varices.
This study is to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of three types of nucleotide/nucleoside analogues in treatment of hepatitis b virus related compensated cirrhosis.
Patients with liver cirrhosis is at risk of developing HCC. To diagnose or detect HCC at CT/MRI, optimal late arterial phase (LAP) acquisition is critical to capture the tumor. For LAP acquisition, bolus-tracking is often used at CT. In patients with portal hypertension, however, bolus-tracking occasionally capture early arterial phase which may be related with slow portomesenteric flow. In this study, we obtain dual arterial phase in patients with suspected portal hypertension and determine whether this protocol (dual arterial phase) would provide higher incidence of LAP acquisition than single arterial phase acquisition.
Acquired dysfunctional immunity in cirrhosis predisposes patients to frequent bacterial infections contributing to disease progression and may lead to the development of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is one of the most frequent infections in cirrhosis and therefore a trigger for ACLF. ACLF is characterized by systemic inflammation even in the absence of confirmed infection and associated with poor outcome. The source of ascites infection, especially in case of culture-positive SBP and bacterascites, is suspected to be bacterial translocation from gut. In decompensated cirrhosis, data on the gut microbial translocation in different circulatory compartments is limited. Moreover, the link between gut microbiome and systemic inflammation in liver disease has still not established. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is applied to treat portal hypertension which frequently leads to intestinal bleeding, life-threatening esophageal bleeding and ascites. Under the procedure of TIPS, the vein blood samples in different compartments (superior mesenteric vein, portal vein and hepatic vein) from patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis are available. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a promise approach for the diagnosis of infectious disease because a comprehensive spectrum of potential causes (viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitic) can be identified by a single assay. Previous study reported that mNGS of cerebrospinal fluid can be applied to diagnosis of meningitis and encephalitis. Comparing to traditional bacterial culture method, mNGS method is more sensitive and rapidly in pathogen detection. Therefore, the circulating microbiome in different compartment can be characterized by means of mNGS. Here, the study aim to investigate the circulating microbiome from superior mesenteric vein (first venous outflow in gut-liver axis), hepatic vein (liver outflow), peripheral vein and ascites from patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis receiving TIPS. Before TIPS, fecal sample and unary sample are collected. And mNGS method is performed to identify the pathogen in ascites,fecal and blood samples in a single center. Ultimately, the study aim to build up the link between gut microbiome translocation and liver disease.
Liver cirrhosis with the further development of portal hypertension implies structural and vasculature alteration in the portosplenic circulation. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is the standard of care for the detection and treatment of esophageal varices, as esophageal varices serve as a surrogate for estimating a portal pressure gradient > 10 mmHG. Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation allows the detection of peri-esophageal collateral veins, perforating veins and para-esophageal collateral veins, which has demonstrated to be effective for the prediction of esophageal varices recurrence after variceal eradication. The investigators aimed to compare esophagogastroduodenoscopy versus endoscopic ultrasound evaluation for the early diagnosis of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication, occurring in approximately 20% of hospitalized cirrhotic patients and has a significant negative impact on patients' outcomes according to either the initial stage (at the time of the first fulfillment of AKI criteria), or the peak stage (at the peak value of serum creatinine concentration during hospitalization). Among all the precipitating factors to cirrhotic AKI, acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage is a common cause that leads to a decrease in effective arterial blood volume in the hyperdynamic circulatory status of cirrhosis. However, there is still lack of optimal predictors to developing AKI in cirrhotic patients suffering from acute GI bleeding. A number of biomarkers associated with AKI were recently described. Some studies have shown that these novel biomarkers increase with the severity of liver injury and are predictive of clinical outcomes. However, the effective prediction, definitive diagnosis and differentiation of AKI by these biomarkers are still controversial. Furthermore, there is no clinical studies focus on the applicability and potential alteration in the setting of acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis. Aim and significance: In this study, we aim to investigate the capability of novel renal biomarkers in predicting development of acute kidney injury, differentiating causes (between pre-renal AKI, acute tubular necrosis, and hepatorenal syndrome), and predicting the response to renal treatment as well as the hepatic and overall outcomes in patients with cirrhosis suffering from acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage.