View clinical trials related to Liver Cirrhosis.
Filter by:Patients with cirrhosis were recruitted and divided into cintrol group and FMT group. Patients in FMT group were carried by fecal microbiota transplantation, and biochemical indexes, intestinal flora and intestinal HIF expression were observed before and after FMT respectively.
Carvedilol has been shown to be more potent in decreasing portal hypertension to propranolol. A lot of studies have shown that the imbalance of flora and the progress of portal hypertension are mutually causal. Berberine can regulate the intestinal flora.In this study, we evaluated the effect of carvedilol and berberine on reducing portal vein pressure by observing the changes of endoscopy，endoscopic ultrasonography and intestinal flora.
While methotrexate (MTX) remains a treatment of choice for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), long-term MTX use has been shown to be associated with liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in these patients. In addition, gut dysbiosis has been found to be associated with liver fibrosis and cirrhosis via the gut-liver axis, underscoring the potential role of gut microbiota and bacterial translocation in the pathogenesis of chronic liver diseases in these patients. In this study, we aim to assess the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis among these patients on MTX treatment compared to those without, using transient elastography. We also aim to identify the possible risk factor(s) for advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis among them. Further, we aim to characterize the difference in fecal microbiota patterns among these three groups of patients. Using a cross-sectional, prospective cohort design, this study will enroll approximately 600 eligible patients, including 300 patients with PsO/PsA and 300 patients with RA, to examine the following hypotheses: 1. Patients on higher cumulative dose of MTX will have higher prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis compared to those on lower cumulative dose of MTX; 2. Patients with MTX use will have higher prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis compared to those without MTX use; 3. The fecal microbiota composition will be different between patients with and without MTX treatment; and 4. The fecal microbiota composition will be different between patients with and without advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis while on MTX treatment.
Clinical trial to compare the effects of terlipressin and octreotide in the reduction of portal hypertension measured as hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in patients with liver cirrhosis
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a growing public health problem that affects more than 5% of the population and can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. These patients are at greater risk of cardiovascular and hepatic death, and higher rates of neoplasms, both gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal. The standard treatment is weight loss with diet and physical exercise, which has shown a histological and analytical improvement in patients who achieve a 5-10% reduction in body weight. However, less than 25% of subjects achieve this goal. Restrictive surgical treatments and gastric bypass have achieved, in obese patients, an improvement in metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and liver histology, but in patients with liver cirrhosis the morbidity-mortality of this surgery is high. Currently, endoscopic techniques are being developed, which are less invasive and have fewer complications, and which also achieve gastric restriction with similar characteristics to those obtained by the surgical method. Among them is the tubulization or vertical gastroplasty with the OverStitch system (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, TX, USA). However, this method has not been evaluated in patients with obesity and/or metabolic syndrome and NASH cirrhosis. For this reason, the main objective of the investigators study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic gastroplasty in improving metabolic factors and liver histology in patients with obesity with or without metabolic syndrome and NASH-compensated cirrhosis.
TQA3526 is a modified bile acid and FXR agonist. FXR is a key regulator of bile acid synthesis and transport. Bile acids are used by the body to help with digestion. It is hypothesized that regular treatment with TQA3526 will improve liver function in persons with Primary Biliary Cirrhosis (PBC).
Variceal bleeding is a major complication of cirrhosis, associated with a hospital mortality rate of 10%-20%. Surviving patients are at high risk for recurrent hemorrhage. For these reasons, management should be directed at its prevention. Endoscopic variceal band ligation (EBL) in combination with non-selective β-blocker (NSBB) therapy is the recommended first line therapy. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) is the most effective method to prevent rebleeding, however, it is burdened with increased hepatic encephalopathy and deterioration of liver function in patients with advanced cirrhosis. So TIPS placement forms an alternative if first line therapy fails. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is currently the best available method to evaluate the presence and severity of portal hypertension. Patients who experience a reduction in HVPG of ≥20% or to <12mmHg in response to drug therapy are defined as 'responders'. The lowest rebleeding rates are observed in patients on secondary prophylaxis who are HVPG responders. A recent meta-analysis has demonstrated that combination therapy is only marginally more effective than drug therapy. This suggests that pharmacological therapy is the cornerstone of combination therapy. Adding EBL may not be the optimal approach to improve the outcome of HVPG nonresponders and HVPG non-responders are a special high-risk population that may benefit from a more aggressive approach, such as an early decision for TIPS. It recently was shown that TIPS placement within 72 hours after acute bleeding not only prevented recurrent bleeding but also improved survival. These raise the question of whether ligation together with NSBB should remain the first choice for elective secondary prophylaxis. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to compare whether HVPG-guided therapy is superior to standard combination therapy for the prevention of variceal bleeding in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
Due to shortage of local studies of the adherence of physicians to the guidelines for albumin use among patients with liver cirrhosis so this study aims to assess: 1. Physicians' knowledge on the evidence-based indications for HA use supported by the international guidelines; 2. Whether HA is used in clinical conditions not supported by solid scientific evidence; 3. To formulate the evidence-based indications for HA use supported by the international guidelines and to evaluate effect of distributing these evidence-based indications on physicians' knowledge.
Variceal bleeding (VB) is a life-threatening complication of cirrhosis with a 6-week mortality of approximately 15%-20%. The 1-year rate of recurrent VB is approximately 60% in patients without prophylaxis treatment. Therefore, all patients who survive VB must receive active treatments to prevent rebleeding. Usually, these patients are submitted to rebleeding prophylaxis with endoscopic band ligation (EBL) combined with non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are reserved for those who failed endoscopic plus medical treatment. A recent meta-analysis comparing combination therapy to monotherapy with EBL or drug therapy has demonstrated that combination therapy is only marginally more effective than NSBB alone. This suggests that NSBB is the cornerstone of combination therapy. The lowest rebleeding rates are observed in patients on secondary prophylaxis who are hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) responders (defined as a reduction in HVPG below 12 mm Hg or > 20% from baseline). A recent study demonstrated that patients who have their first episode of variceal bleeding while on primary prophylaxis with NSBB have an increased risk of further bleeding and death, despite adding EBL. These patients possibly require alternative treatment approaches, such as TIPS. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of TIPS vs. EBL + NSBB for the prevention of rebleeding in NSBB non-responder for primary prophylaxis.
Gastric varices (GV) are present in around 20% of patients with cirrhosis. Bleeding from GV accounts for 10-20% of all variceal bleeding. For the prevention of gastric variceal bleeding, TIPS or BRTO as firstline treatments were suggested. No randomized trials have compared BRTO with other therapies. BRTO and its variations might increase portal pressure and might worsen complications, such as ascites or bleeding from EV. In this regard, if NSBB is combined with BRTO and its variations (we called interventional devascularization) for those HVPG responders, the drawbacks of interventional devascularization might be overcome. Therefore, the investigators conducted this RCT to compare the effectiveness and safety of TIPS with those of interventional devascularization in the prevention of rebleeding from gastric varices.