Latex Allergy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Switching to Powder Free Latex Gloves in the Entire OR as Part of a New ' Latex Safe' Protocol: a Safe Alternative? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study
Verified date | November 2016 |
Source | Jessa Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Belgium: Ethics Committee |
Study type | Observational |
Study objectives
Primary objective:
This study wants to evaluate the safety of a latex safe protocol as proposed by the
Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy. In other words,the investigators
hope to demonstrate that patients with known latex allergy or latex sensitisation can be
treated safely in operating theatres without special requirements towards scheduling
provided that all powdered latex gloves are removed from the OR environment( preparation
rooms, theatres, recovery room and surroundings). In contrast, earlier guidelines require
the theatre to be left unused during at least 3 hours before a patient with suspected latex
allergy can be operated on in this theatre.
Secondary objectives:
- The investigators want to evaluate to what extend patients who report a latex allergy
show risk factors of latex allergy.
- To investigate to what extend latex allergy was proven by laboratory testing or skin
testing in patients who report a latex allergy.
- Type of latex allergic reaction when patients report a latex allergy.
- The level of satisfaction of surgeons and OR scheduling staff with the new latex safe
protocol and with the switching to powder free latex gloves.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 221 |
Est. completion date | November 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | October 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. All patients who report prior latex allergic reactions 2. High risk patients: - Frequent blather catheterization: meningomyelocoele, spina bifida, congenital defects of the uro-genital tract. - A medical history of multiple surgical procedures - Atopic constitution( asthma/hay fever/ eczema) and/ or a specific food allergy,eczema) and/ or a specific food allergy( avocado, kiwi, banana, hazelnut, stone fruit, chest nut and to a lesser extent grapes, mango, melon, pineapple, figs, cherry, passion fruit, walnut)(9) 3. professional exposure: health care workers, hairdressers, chemical industries Exclusion Criteria: - The patient refuses to cooperate. These patients will be treated in the same way, although we will not collect any data. - The patient patient is unable to cooperate as a result of circumstances that may interfere with collecting the data or make them unreliable. Eg. Language barriers. |
Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Belgium | Jessaziekenhuis Hasselt | Hasselt | Limburg |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Jessa Hospital |
Belgium,
1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Occupational Health of Operating Room Personnel. Natural Ruber Latex Allergy: Considerations for anesthesiologists. American Society of Anesthesiologists.[brochure] 2005: 1-30.
2. Association of Surgical Technologists. Guideline statements for the N atural Rubber Latex Protein allergic patient in the operating room environment(adopted BOD October 2005, updated BOD January 2014). [available from: www.ast.org] accessed 19/08/2015.
6. American Association of Nurse Anesthetists. Latex allergy management( Guidelines). [available from: www.aana.org] accessed 15/08/2015.
8. Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy. Operating suite guidelines for latex allergic patients. [Available online from: www.allergy.org] accessed 15/08/2015.
Becker HS. An analysis of the epidemiology of latex allergy: implications for primary prevention. Medsurg Nurs. 2000 Jun;9(3):135-43. Review. — View Citation
Binkley HM, Schroyer T, Catalfano J. Latex allergies: a review of recognition, evaluation, management, prevention, education, and alternative product use. J Athl Train. 2003 Apr;38(2):133-40. — View Citation
Demaegd J, Soetens F, Herregods L. Latex allergy: a challenge for anaesthetists. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2006;57(2):127-35. Review. — View Citation
Reines HD, Seifert PC. Patient safety: latex allergy. Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;85(6):1329-40, xiv. Review. — View Citation
Sleth JC. [Starting the day with latex-sensitised patients: still up to date?]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2011 Oct;30(10):764-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2011.06.006. French. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The number and type of latex allergic reactions occuring in our included patients up to 72 hours post-operatively. | The research team wants to investigate how many latex allergic reactions occur. types: Irritation dermatitis: non-allergic reaction to an irritans,minutes to hours after exposure. Symptoms: itching, erythema, a burning sensation, blistering, flakiness and fissuring of the skin. Never life-threatening. Allergic contact dermatitis( type 4 reaction): T- cell mediated sensitivity for chemical additives absorbed by the skin. Occurs 6 to 48 hours following exposure and peaks after 48 to 72 hours. Lesions may exceed the contact area and consist of itching, erythema, blistering or flakiness.( cf irritation dermatitis.) IgE mediated immediate hypersensitivity( type 1 reaction): B-cell mediated production of IgE antibodies towards Hev b latex proteins. Symptoms: after a few minutes up to 1 hour, depending of the route of exposure( inhalation, parenteral,mucous membrane exposure). Severity also varies in relation to the route of exposure. Potentially lethal anaphylaxis. |
72 hours after surgery | Yes |
Secondary | How many patients (percentage of patients) who report a latex allergy have confirmed this diagnosis by laboratory testing or skin prick tests? Assessment by questionnaire | baseline | No | |
Secondary | Prevalence of risk factors of latex allergy in the study population. assessment by questionnaire | To what extend do patients who report a latex allergy show risk factors such as: Congenital defects of the genito-urinary tract Spina bifida Meningomyelocoele a medical history consisting of multiple surgical procedures Food allergies (tropical fruit, nuts, stone fruit, avocado, others) Atopic constitution( asthma, eczema, rhinitis, hay fever) Professional exposure( hairdressers, health care workers, latex exposure in latex industries or chemical related jobs) (anaphylaxis of unknown origin during previous hospital stays or procedures) |
baseline | No |
Secondary | General satisfaction. Assessment by questionnaire | This study wants to evaluate the level of satisfaction with surgeons and OR scheduling staff regarding the newly implemented protocol.The investigators will do so by scoring satisfaction on numeric rating scales(NRS).The research team will evaluate: General satisfaction by means of a numeric rating scale ranging from 0(very dissatisfied) to 10 ( very satisfied). The new protocol was implemented starting from 01-07-2015. The investigators will evaluate general satisfaction 8 months after implementation( period of 01-02-2016 till 01-03-2016). |
Assessment 8 months after introduction of the protocol | No |
Secondary | simplifacation of the OR schedule. Assesment by questionnaire | The research team will evaluate whether this new protocol has simplified the OR schedule. The investigators will do so by means of a numeric rating scale ranging from 0(not true at all) up to 10(absolutely true) which has to be answered by surgeons and OR scheduling staff. The investigators will evaluate this up to 8 months after introduction of the new protocol(period of 01-02-2016 till 01-03-2016).The new protocol was implemented starting from 01-07-2015. |
assessment up to 8 months after introduction of the protocol | No |
Secondary | Satisfaction regarding a new type of surgical gloves | The investigators will evaluate the level of satisfaction regarding the new type of surgical gloves in case the surgeon had to switch. We will do so by means of a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (very unsatisfied) up to 10 (very satisfied). The investigators will evaluate this up to 8 months after introduction of the new protocol( period of 01-02-2016 till 01-03-2016).The new protocol was implemented starting from 01-07-2015. | assessment up to 8 months after introduction of the protocol | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05515276 -
The COVID-19 Pandemic Process Increase Latex Glove Use and Latex Allergy Complaints in Hospital Nurses? Survey Study
|
||
Terminated |
NCT01133288 -
Yulex Glove Prospective Study in Spina Bifida
|
N/A |