View clinical trials related to Laryngoscopy.
Filter by:The rate of successful intubation and the required time for intubation, using Vie Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope will be compared, in order to evaluate the efficacy of Vie Scope in comparison with Macintosh in expected easy airways. Hence, a prospective randomized controlled single-blind superiority clinical trial will be conducted. Inclusion criteria: patients of both sexes, positive or negative rapid test for COVID-19 or possible contamination, age ≥18 years old, BMI: 18.5 - 30 kg/m2, visualization of the glottis grade 1 or 2, according to Cormack-Lehane Classification. Exclusion criteria: age under 18 years old, BMI under 18.5 kg/m2 and BMI over 30 kg/m2, visualization of the glottis grade 3 - 4, according to Cormack-Lehane Classification. The laryngoscopy and intubation of the patients will be attempted by the same person-resident of Anesthesiology, under the supervision of experienced Anesthesiologist consultants.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate possible differences in airway responses and interventions during intravenous anesthesia for direct laryngoscopy in children when comparing two oxygenation methods (conventional low flow oxygen supplementation via nasopharyngeal tube versus Nasal High Flow Therapy with the OptiflowTM system ).
This study aims to compare the exposure of glottis by the use of video and direct laryngoscopy.
This study evaluates the correlation between sedation depth monitoring obtained by NeuroSENSE ® NS 701 Monitor and reflexes during intravenous anesthesia in children undergoing direct laryngoscopy for surgical procedures.
Many studies have been conducted for the feasibility of using dexmedetomidine as premedication. However, bradycardia and hypotension frequently occurred following the premedication with dexmedetomidine, either via intramuscular or intravenous route. This is particularly true when using a high dose of dexmedetomidine: a intramuscular dose over 2 μg•kg-1 or a intravenous dose over 1 μg•kg-1 can elicit marked decreases in heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure. Subsequent studies using high-dose dexmedetomidine further revealed the potential impact of its detrimental haemodynamic profile on clinical outcomes. Most studies using high-dose dexmedetomidine were predominantly adopted with the dose-finding study performed by Aho and colleague, whom reported that 2.5 μg•kg-1 dose of intramuscular dexmedetomidine was comparably sedative and anxiolytic to 0.08 mg•kg-1 midazolam. However, few investigations have addressed the clinical effects of low-dose dexmedetomidine as premedication. Considering modern anaesthesia has advanced a long way towards eliminating the routine need for a deep preoperative sedation. It has, therefore, become desirable to asses dexmedetomidine as an effective premedication using a moderate sedative dose to minimize its undesired hemodynamic effects. We set a prospective study to compare the sedative, haemodynamic, adjuvant anaesthetic effects and patient's satisfaction of low-dose dexmedetomidine (1μg•kg-1) with midazolam (0.03 mg•kg-1), the most commonly used premedication, used as an intramuscular injective administration in patients undergoing suspension laryngoscopic surgery under general anaesthesia.
Eighty subjects will be recruited from those scheduled for surgery requiring general anesthesia at St Vincent's Hospital. Subjects must have American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status of 1 or 2 (be fairly healthy), a BMI between 18-35 (reasonably healthy weight), and be between the ages of 18 and 75. They will not be eligible if they take certain medications or are expected to have a difficult intubation. Subjects will be randomized (assigned by chance) to one of four rocuronium doses of 0, 0.2, 0.4, or 0.6 mg kg-1. All are acceptable clinical doses for performing a laryngoscopy. In the operating room, routine monitors will be applied, including a Bispectral Index (BIS) sensor and an M-Entropy sensor. Subjects will receive 0.025 mg kg-1 midazolam (a standard pre-op dose) and will be put to sleep. Once asleep, the subject will receive a rocuronium dose, followed by laryngoscopy three minutes later. The anesthesiologist performing the laryngoscopy will not know what dose of rocuronium the subject received. CVI, entropy, amount of muscle relaxation, and vital signs will be monitored and recorded throughout the procedure. Subjects will receive propofol and remifentanil infusions during the case. These are commonly used medications for anesthesia. The subjects will also be randomized to two additional groups. One group will receive a remifentanil infusion of 2ng ml-1 and the other group will receive a 8ng ml-1 remifentanil infusion. Both doses are acceptable and often used during standard clinical care. The propofol infusion will be adjusted to keep the BIS number between 45-60. The anesthesiologist will not be able to see the CVI value. The times of certain intraoperative events, such as intubation and incision, will be recorded. All subjects will receive a morphine bolus (0.10-0.15 mg/kg) towards the end to reduce post-operative pain, as per standard clinical care. As the subject wakes up, time to eye opening and orientation will be recorded. The subject will rate their pain on a numerical pain scale and the quality of emergence will be assessed. Upon arrival in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU), subjects will be asked to rate their pain again using the same pain scale. The pain score will be evaluated every 10 minutes for half an hour, then every hour until they are discharged from PACU.