Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06156865
Other study ID # 3R01DC019337-04S1
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 19, 2024
Est. completion date June 30, 2025

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source University of Toronto
Contact Karla N Washington, PhD
Phone 416-978-6499
Email karla.washington@utoronto.ca
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Late talkers (LT), representing 10-20% of children under 3, demonstrate hallmark syntax and vocabulary deficits similar to preschoolers with developmental language disorder. While effective and early interventions can mitigate the impact of late talking, not enough is known about its neural basis, yet is needed to inform the design of more individualized interventions. This proposed effort uses neuroimaging, along with behavioral methods, with the goal of better understanding the memory-language mechanisms that underlie learning and late talking, while also considering their association to treatment-related changes in LT.


Description:

Late talking represents one of the most common reasons children under 3-years of age are referred for speech-language evaluations, impacting about 10%-20% of children in this age-group. Late talkers (LT) also share similarities with children diagnosed with developmental language disorder (DLD) at 4 - 5 years of age, endorsing the notion that shared neurobiological underpinnings might exist between these two clinical groups. However, little is known about the neural basis of late talking, yet is needed to better inform the design of efficacious therapies that address hallmark delays in syntax and vocabulary. For the DLD population, domain-general processes relating memory and language are being investigated in the parent grant, offering valuable testing ground for also advancing the current knowledge base regarding LT. The Procedural circuit Deficit Hypothesis (PDH) posits that relative strengths and weaknesses exist between procedural (impaired) and declarative (less impaired) memory systems. Structural abnormalities in connections between frontal brain regions and basal ganglia, with under activation and reduced connectivity also evident. However, cortical and subcortical regions in the temporal lobes, including hippocampus, might be impaired to a lesser degree. This proposed research will use diffusion imaging to describe the neural basis (structural connectivity) of late talking and treatment-related change by way of the PDH. The investigators will gather data regarding LT before, after, and following a break in standard intervention for LT (e.g., parent coaching, direct therapy for children who are LT): LT treatment. The investigators will also include a "business as usual": LT no treatment as part of a highly feasible pragmatic design that leverages existing pipelines. The investigators will also include typically developing (TD) peers to inform development vs late talking. The central hypothesis is that treatment designed to improve syntax and vocabulary will change procedural and declarative networks in association with increases in language function and the degree of improvement may be associated with the underlying neurobiology of baseline syntax and vocabulary deficits. Building on a robust history of recruitment and treatment of toddlers by the investigators' partnering sites, and the investigators' successful imaging partner, this project will enroll 30 LT (n=15 treatment; n=15 controls) and 15 TD peers. Aim 1 will establish the structural connectivity in LT and their TD peers between regions in the procedural learning and declarative networks. In Aim 2, the investigators will establish the neurobiological basis of treatment-related changes in LT only. The investigators examine potential changes in structural connectivity between regions of the procedural learning and declarative memory networks, and investigate whether treatment-related changes occur into the typical range (LT, TD). To meet the scientific goals, the investigators pair behavioral tools (syntax and vocabulary) with neuroimaging to describe co-occurring behavioral performance underlying learning and outcome, while also gathering parental and clinician qualitative data regarding treatment outcomes. This research will contribute novel insights into mechanisms underlying learning and impairment to offer a ground-breaking shift in the understanding of LT.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 45
Est. completion date June 30, 2025
Est. primary completion date April 30, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Months to 30 Months
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - child and parent are monolingual/native (primarily) English speakers - child is enrolled at one of the participating facilities - child is recruited via word of mouth, including social media - child is between 18 and 30 months of age - child does not have any contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (i.e., intracranial metal implants, claustrophobia) - child does not have any uncorrected vision challenges Exclusion Criteria: - Child does not meet criteria for LT or typical development - Standard magnetic resonance imaging exclusion criteria - Gestational age less than 37 weeks or greater than 42 weeks - Special education placement of child based on ability or behavior

Study Design


Intervention

Behavioral:
Intervention to address late talking
this intervention is designed to support both speech and language development in children who are toddlers. Given the age group of children their parents are part of the intervention program. Importantly the frequency of the intervention can range from once to twice per week, with timing also designed to complement the particular agency

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Grandview Kids Oshawa Ontario
Canada Speech Specialists Toronto Ontario

Sponsors (5)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Toronto Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Georgetown University, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, University of Cincinnati

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Aim 1/Pre - qualitative data clinician reported Other outcomes using themes from qualitative questions to the clinicians of the 45 participants. Scores on a scale are not used in this qualitative effort. Weeks 1 to 2 (Pre/Time 1)
Other Aim 1/Pre - qualitative data parent reported Other outcomes using themes from qualitative questions to the parents of each of the 45 participants. Scores on a scale are not used in this qualitative effort. Weeks 1 to 2 (Pre/Time 1)
Other Aim 2 - Qualitative data parent reported Other outcomes using themes from qualitative questions to the parents of each of the 30 children who are late talkers. These qualitative data are collected at three time points: pre, post, followup. Scores on a scale are not used in this qualitative effort. Weeks 1 or 2 (pre/Time 1); Weeks 9 or 10 (post/Time 2), Weeks 17 or 18 (followup/Time 3)
Other Aim 2 - qualitative data clinician reported Other outcomes using themes from qualitative questions to the clinicians of the 30 children who are late talkers. These qualitative data are collected at three time points: pre, post, followup. Scores on a scale are not used in this qualitative effort. Weeks 1 or 2 (pre/Time 1); Weeks 9 or 10 (post/Time 2), Weeks 17 or 18 (followup/Time 3)
Primary Aim 1/Pre - Structural connectivity data using diffusion imaging Connectivity data (density of streamlines connecting regions of the procedural learning and declarative networks) will be measured using tractography, a 3D modeling technique, to visually represent nerve tracts using data that we collect using diffusion MRI from each of the 45 participants at Weeks 1 to 2 as part of a non-sedated sleep scan. Weeks 1 to 2 (Time 1/pre)
Primary Aim 2/Pre - Changes in structural connectivity data using diffusion imaging Changes in connectivity data (density of streamlines connecting regions of the procedural learning and declarative networks) calculated using data collected over two time points (pre to post; post to followup) will be measured from each of the 45 participants. Connectivity data measured using tractography collected using diffusion MRI are gathered from these participants at pre, post, and followup to inform these changes over time as part of a non-sedated sleep scan. Weeks 1 to 8 or 9 (pre to post); Weeks 10 to 17 or 18 (post to followup)
Secondary Aim 1/Pre - Raw score on the MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories: Words and Sentences- (first set) Raw score data calculated using the MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories: Words and Sentences. This measure is completed by each of the 45 children's parents. High scores indicate better performance compared to lower scores. Minimum score is '0' and maximum is '680'. These data serve as main secondary outcomes. Weeks 1 to 2 (Time 1/pre - first set)
Secondary Aim 1 - Raw score on the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six Parent Version- (second set) Raw score data calculated using the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under - Parent Version. This measure is completed by each of the 45 children's parents. High scores indicate better performance compared to lower scores. Minimum score is '0' and maximum is '238'. These data will inform main secondary outcomes. Weeks 1 to 2 - (Time 1/pre - second set)
Secondary Aim 1/Pre - Raw score on the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six Clinician Version- (third set) Raw score data calculated using the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under - Clinician Version. This measure is completed by each of the 45 children's clinicians. High scores indicate better performance compared to lower scores. Minimum score is '0' and maximum is '238'. These data will inform main secondary outcomes. Weeks 1 to 2 - (Time 1/pre - third set)
Secondary Aim 1/Pre - Raw score on the Intelligibility in Context Scale- (fourth set) Raw score data calculated using the Intelligibility in Context Scale. This measure is completed by each of the 45 children's parents. High scores indicate better performance compared to lower scores. Minimum score is '0' and maximum is '35'. These data will inform additional secondary outcomes. Weeks 1 to 2 - (Time 1/pre - fourth set)
Secondary Aim 1/Pre - Raw score on the Communication Function Classification System- (fifth set) Raw score data obtained using the Communication Function Classification System. This measure is completed by each of the 45 children's parents. Lower scores indicate better performance compared to higher scores. The minimum score is "1" and the maximum is "5". These data will inform additional secondary outcomes. Weeks 1 to 2 - (Time 1/pre - fifth set)
Secondary Aim 1/Pre - Raw score calculated using a Consonant Inventory- (sixth set) Raw score data obtained using a Consonant Inventory collected during a play-based language sample. These data are collected from each of the 45 children during their assessment with the clinician. Higher scores indicate better performance compared to lower scores. The minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is "24". These data will inform additional secondary outcomes. Weeks 1 to 2 - (Time 1/pre - sixth set)
Secondary Aim 1/Pre - Raw score calculated using a Play-based language sample- (seventh set) Raw score data obtained on language complexity (grammar and vocabulary) collected during a play-based language sample timed for 15-minutes. These data are collected from each of the 45 children during their assessment with the clinician. Higher scores indicate better performance compared to lower scores. The minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is variable. There is not a ceiling since this is based on a spontaneous language sample and some children can talk more than others during the 15-minute period. However we have a metric of performance based on scores less than the 10th percentile and then those greater than the 10th percentile. Performance at or below the 10th percentile is worse than performance greater than the 10th percentile. These data will inform additional secondary outcomes. Weeks 1 to 2 - (Time 1/pre - seventh set)
Secondary Aim 2 - Changes in structural connectivity data using diffusion imaging for late talkers only Changes in connectivity data (density of streamlines connecting regions of the procedural learning and declarative networks) calculated using data collected over two time points (pre to post; post to followup) will be measured from only the 30 participants who are late talkers. Connectivity data measured using tractography collected using diffusion MRI are gathered from these participants at pre, post, and followup to inform these changes over time as part of a non-sedated sleep scan. Weeks 1 to 8 or 9 (pre to post); Weeks 10 to 17 or 18 (post to followup)
Secondary Aim 2 - Raw score changes on the MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories: Words and Sentences- (first set) Raw change score data calculated using the MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories: Words and Sentences that is completed at pre, post, followup. This measure is completed on three occasions by the 30 parents whose children are late talkers. High change scores indicate better performance compared to lower change scores. The minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is "680". These data serve as main secondary outcomes to inform immediate (pre-post) and maintenance of changes (post-followup). Weeks 1 to 8 or 9 (pre to post); Weeks 10 to 17 or 18 (post to followup)
Secondary Aim 2 - Raw score changes on the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six Parent Version- (second set) Raw change score data calculated using the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six that is completed at pre, post, followup. This measure is completed on three occasions by the 30 parents whose children are late talkers. High change scores indicate better performance compared to lower change scores. The minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is "238". These data serve as main secondary outcomes to inform immediate (pre-post) and maintenance of changes (post-followup). Weeks 1 to 8 or 9 (pre to post); Weeks 10 to 17 or 18 (post to followup)
Secondary Aim 2 - Raw score changes on the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six Clinician Version- (third set) Raw change score data calculated using the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six that is completed at pre, post, followup. This measure is completed on three occasions by the clinicians of the 30 children who are late talkers. High change scores indicate better performance compared to lower change scores. The minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is "238". These data serve as main secondary outcomes to inform immediate (pre-post) and maintenance of changes (post-followup). Weeks 1 to 8 or 9 (pre to post); Weeks 10 to 17 or 18 (post to followup)
Secondary Aim 2 - Raw score changes on the Intelligibility in Context Scale- (fourth set) Raw change score data calculated using the Intelligibility in Context Scale that is completed at pre, post, followup. This measure is completed on three occasions by the 30 parents whose children are late talkers. High change scores indicate better performance compared to lower change scores. The minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is "35". These data serve as additional secondary outcomes to inform immediate (pre-post) and maintenance of changes (post-followup). Weeks 1 to 8 or 9 (pre to post); Weeks 10 to 17 or 18 (post to followup)
Secondary Aim 2 - Raw score changes on the Communication Function Classification System- CFCS (fifth set) Raw change score data calculated using the Communication Function Classification System that is completed at pre, post, followup. This measure is completed on three occasions by the 30 parents whose children are late talkers. Higher change scores indicate better performance compared to lower change scores. The minimum score is "1" and the maximum score is "5". These data serve as additional secondary outcomes to inform immediate (pre-post) and maintenance of changes (post-followup). Weeks 1 to 8 or 9 (pre to post); Weeks 10 to 17 or 18 (post to followup)
Secondary Aim 2 - Raw score changes in the Consonant Inventory- (sixth set) Raw change score data obtained using a Consonant Inventory collected during a play-based language sample that is completed at pre, post, followup. These data are collected on three occasions from the 30 children who are late talkers. Higher change scores indicate better performance compared to lower change scores. The minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is "24". These data serve as additional secondary outcomes to inform immediate (pre-post) and maintenance of changes (post-followup). Weeks 1 to 8 or 9 (pre to post); Weeks 10 to 17 or 18 (post to followup)
Secondary Aim 2 - Raw change scores calculated using a Play-based language sample- (seventh set) Raw change score data obtained on language complexity (grammar and vocabulary). These data are calculated during a play-based language sample that is completed with a clinician at pre, post, followup. These data are collected on three occasions from the 30 children who are late talkers. Higher change scores indicate better performance compared to lower change scores. The minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is variable. There is not a ceiling since this is based on a spontaneous language sample and some children can talk more than others during the 15-minute period. However we have a metric of performance based on scores less than the 10th percentile and then those greater than the 10th percentile. Performance at or below the 10th percentile is worse than performance greater than the 10th percentile. These data serve as additional secondary outcomes to inform immediate (pre-post) and maintenance of changes (post-followup). Weeks 1 to 8 or 9 (pre to post); Weeks 10 to 17 or 18 (post to followup)
Secondary Aim 2 - Raw change scores calculated using the MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories- (eighth set) Raw change score data calculated using the MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories: Words and Sentences that is completed at pre, post, followup. This measure is completed on three occasions by the 30 parents of children who are late talkers as well as by the 15 parents of typically developing peers. High change scores indicate better performance compared to lower change scores. The minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is "680". These data serve as additional secondary outcomes to inform immediate (pre-post) and maintenance of changes (post-followup). Weeks 1 to 8 or 9 (pre to post); Weeks 10 to 17 or 18 (post to followup)
Secondary Raw change scores calculated using the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six Parent Version- (ninth set) Raw change score data calculated using the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six Parent Version that is completed at pre, post, followup. This measure is completed on three occasions by the 30 parents of children who are late talkers as well as by the 15 parents of typically developing peers. High change scores indicate better performance compared to lower change scores. The minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is "238". These data serve as additional secondary outcomes to inform immediate (pre-post) and maintenance of changes (post-followup). Weeks 1 to 8 or 9 (pre to post); Weeks 10 to 17 or 18 (post to followup)
Secondary Raw change scores calculated using the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six Clinician Version- (tenth set) Raw change score data calculated using the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six Clinician Version that is completed at pre, post, followup. This measure is completed on three occasions by the clinicians of 30 children who are late talkers as well as by clinicians of 15 typically developing peers. High change scores indicate better performance compared to lower change scores. The minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is "238". These data serve as additional secondary outcomes to inform immediate (pre-post) and maintenance of changes (post-followup). Weeks 1 to 8 or 9 (pre to post); Weeks 10 to 17 or 18 (post to followup)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03268928 - Evaluating the Impact of Story Starters on Children's Language Development N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04919343 - Do Video Materials Help Parents to Support Infant Development? N/A
Recruiting NCT06026124 - Retrieval-Based Word Learning in Developmental Language Disorder During Book Reading N/A
Completed NCT02853786 - Language Environment in Children With Cochlear Implants N/A
Recruiting NCT02998164 - Improving Outcomes Using Technology for Children Who Are DHH N/A
Recruiting NCT04857255 - Technology-assisted Language Intervention (TALI) N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04609553 - Literacy Promotion for Latinos Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05339464 - Ready and Healthy for Kindergarten N/A
Completed NCT03795454 - Can Singing Kangaroo Improve Outcome of Preterm Infants N/A
Completed NCT03076268 - TMP-Visitas al Hogar N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05325333 - Retrieval-Based Word Learning in Developmental Language Disorder N/A
Recruiting NCT06125093 - Study of an Early Parenting Intervention for Children With Genetic Abnormalities and Mental Health Problems N/A
Recruiting NCT06261307 - Language Development Deficits and Early Interactive Music Intervention N/A
Completed NCT06001866 - Retrieval-Based Word Learning in Developmental Language Disorder: Verb Learning N/A
Completed NCT03766906 - STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering & Math) Familia Talk N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05508282 - Testing an App-Based Approach to Reading and Screen Time Guidance for Parents of Infants N/A
Completed NCT04027673 - Thirty Million Words-Early Childhood Educator (TMW-ECE) N/A
Completed NCT04423133 - Bilingual Family Literacy Program Pilot N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05861531 - Learning to Talk, Learning to Eat: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve NICU Oral Feeding and Language Outcomes N/A
Completed NCT02774356 - Testing Native Language Neural Commitment at the Subcortical Level N/A