Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04758702
Other study ID # 63364
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 1
First received
Last updated
Start date February 24, 2021
Est. completion date May 25, 2023

Study information

Verified date May 2023
Source University of Kentucky
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

A Randomized, Three Parallel Arms Clinical Trial to evaluate s the clinical impact of L-PRF vs H-PRF vs Palatal stent on the healing of the donor palatal site.


Description:

A Randomized, Three Parallel Arms Clinical Trial. The primary objective is to assess the clinical impact of L-PRF vs H-PRF vs Palatal stent on the healing of the donor palatal site by comparing the percentage of re-epithelization of the palatal donor site at 5, 10, 14 and 21 days using a standardized intraoral palatal photo. The secondary objective is to compare the post op discomfort between the three groups during the healing period daily for 2 weeks using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Analgesic consumption. All subjects from the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry clinics. Subjects that are coming increasing the width of keratinized tissue or for the treatment of gingival recession, and match the inclusion criteria will be told about the research and offered the opportunity to participate.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 30
Est. completion date May 25, 2023
Est. primary completion date May 25, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subjects between 18-65 years of age. 2. Subjects need FGG or de-epithelialized Connective tissue graft 3. Good oral hygiene (Plaque and bleeding indexes <20%). 4. Subjects can withstand alginate impression or wear a retainer. 5. No other surgery or need for analgesics at the same site. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subjects with any systemic disorders that might compromise wound healing (Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, chemotherapy/radiotherapy and immunological disorders). 2. Smokers 3. Patients not maintaining oral hygiene (plaque score >20%) 4. Pregnant or breastfeeding females. 5. Inability to provide informed consent. 6. Grafts thickness more than 2mm will be excluded from the study.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Biological:
L-PRF (Leucocyte- platelet rich fibrin)
Leucocyte-Platelet rich fibrin is a high density fibrin clot. it serves as a biological healing matrix by supporting cell migration and cytokine release, expanding the range of its potential applications greatly. Patient's own blood is centrifuged using (Intra-spin) FDA approved centrifuge on 45 degrees angle on 2700 rpm for 12 minutes.
H-PRF (Horizontal -platelet rich fibrin)
Platelet rich fibrin is a high density fibrin clot. it serves as a biological healing matrix by supporting cell migration and cytokine release, expanding the range of its potential applications greatly.Horizontally centrifuged platelet rich fibrin using (Bio-prf) centrifuge on 700 g force for 8 minutes. On a horizontal centrifugation, the cells separate much more efficiently throughout the entire membrane. This leads to better layer separation and also favors cells that are evenly distributed throughout the PRF clot.
Device:
Surgical stent
An essix surgical stent will be obtained using a high vacuum suction and used to protect the denuded donor site after suturing the wound. (Biostar® Scan/Biostar®V) will be used to make the stent.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Abdo Y Ismail

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The Clinical Impact of L-PRF, H-PRF, or the Use of a Surgical Stent on Palatal Donor Site Healing. The primary outcome is to asses the percentage of re-epithelization of the palatal donor site and assess primary wound healing. 5 days
Primary The Clinical Impact of L-PRF, H-PRF, or the Use of a Surgical Stent on Palatal Donor Site Healing. The primary outcome is to asses the percentage of re-epithelization of the palatal donor site and assess primary wound healing. 10 days
Primary The Clinical Impact of L-PRF, H-PRF, or the Use of a Surgical Stent on Palatal Donor Site Healing. The primary outcome is to asses the percentage of re-epithelization of the palatal donor site and assess primary wound healing. 14 days
Primary The Clinical Impact of L-PRF, H-PRF, or the Use of a Surgical Stent on Palatal Donor Site Healing. The primary outcome is to asses the percentage of re-epithelization of the palatal donor site and assess primary wound healing. 21 days
Secondary The Clinical Impact of L-PRF, H-PRF, or the Use of a Surgical Stent on Palatal Donor Site Healing. The secondary outcome is to compare the post-operative discomfort between the three groups during the healing period using the Visual Analogue Scale and Analgesic consumption. The visual analog scale is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain; with (0) indicates no pain and (10) indicates worst pain possible. Scores will be recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain", which is the (0) and "worst pain possible", which is the (10). Also, the patient will write down his/her analgesic consumption, including the frequency and the amount used. 5 days
Secondary The Clinical Impact of L-PRF, H-PRF, or the Use of a Surgical Stent on Palatal Donor Site Healing. The secondary outcome is to compare the post-operative discomfort between the three groups during the healing period using the Visual Analogue Scale and Analgesic consumption. The visual analog scale is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain; with (0) indicates no pain and (10) indicates worst pain possible. Scores will be recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain", which is the (0) and "worst pain possible", which is the (10). Also, the patient will write down his/her analgesic consumption, including the frequency and the amount used. 10 days
Secondary The Clinical Impact of L-PRF, H-PRF, or the Use of a Surgical Stent on Palatal Donor Site Healing. The secondary outcome is to compare the post-operative discomfort between the three groups during the healing period using the Visual Analogue Scale and Analgesic consumption. The visual analog scale is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain; with (0) indicates no pain and (10) indicates worst pain possible. Scores will be recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain", which is the (0) and "worst pain possible", which is the (10). Also, the patient will write down his/her analgesic consumption, including the frequency and the amount used. 14 days
Secondary The Clinical Impact of L-PRF, H-PRF, or the Use of a Surgical Stent on Palatal Donor Site Healing. The secondary outcome is to compare the post-operative discomfort between the three groups during the healing period using the Visual Analogue Scale and Analgesic consumption. The visual analog scale is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain; with (0) indicates no pain and (10) indicates worst pain possible. Scores will be recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain", which is the (0) and "worst pain possible", which is the (10). Also, the patient will write down his/her analgesic consumption, including the frequency and the amount used. 21 days
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05287152 - Titanium Tacked Soft Tissue Stabilization : A Novel Technique For Free Gingival Graft Fixation N/A
Recruiting NCT05604391 - The Effect of Free Gingival Graft on Root Closure N/A
Completed NCT05804760 - Predictive Value of Reduced Keratinized Mucosa on the Secondary Prevention of Peri-implant Mucositis and Periimplantitis in Patients Attending Regular Supportive Peri-implant Care. A Longitudinal Analysis
Active, not recruiting NCT04179448 - A Comparison of Side Access Mucosal Releasing Incision (SAMRI) and Sulcular Tunnel Access to Treat Gingival Recession. N/A