Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06370910
Other study ID # CAAE 58569421.5.0000.5327
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 1, 2023
Est. completion date January 10, 2024

Study information

Verified date April 2024
Source Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The changes that occur during pregnancy can lead to symptoms and complaints for women. Vaginal delivery has several benefits for both the mother and baby; however, during labor, some injuries may occur, such as lacerations and episiotomies. It is known that the postpartum period is when the body is involuting to its pre-pregnancy state. The perineal pain caused by these injuries during childbirth is a determining factor for recovery, and it may affect not only the physical but also the psychological well-being of women. Therefore, it is necessary to employ techniques that can alleviate pain and edema in the immediate postpartum period, directly influencing recovery. Objective: To compare the use of photobiomodulation with cryotherapy in the immediate postpartum period of 2 hours in parturients who suffered 1st and 2nd-degree lacerations and/or episiotomies. Methods: A randomized clinical trial will be conducted to compare two interventions. Data collection will be through a questionnaire and scales for the evaluation of pain and edema, with women who experienced vaginal delivery and those who suffered 1st and 2nd-degree lacerations or episiotomies. Expected results: Reduction of pain, edema, and inflammatory processes with non-pharmacological techniques, leading to greater comfort and better postpartum recovery.


Description:

Faced with the scarcity of evidence indicating the best approach to reducing edema and relieving pain in the postpartum period, there is a need to evaluate new methods for pain relief during this time to ensure better well-being for women in the postpartum period. Lacerations and episiotomies, which can occur during vaginal delivery, exacerbate this pain, making it even more necessary to utilize resources to alleviate discomfort and perineal and vulvar edema, which can consequently worsen pain. The postpartum period is challenging, with numerous adjustments, and pain can be debilitating, making this period particularly challenging. However, it is possible to minimize it with non-pharmacological interventions. Cryotherapy has proven to be a valuable resource already utilized in the immediate postpartum period, and low-intensity laser therapy has also demonstrated effectiveness in pain relief, both with low associated risks and costs. Therefore, it is crucial to compare which therapeutic approach is most effective during the immediate postpartum period. While vaginal delivery offers many benefits, such as rapid recovery, it can be associated with perineal trauma, leading to pain, breastfeeding difficulties, and discomfort, which directly interfere with activities of daily living The use of an ice pack is inexpensive and effective in relieving pain in the immediate postpartum period, whereas low-level laser therapy (LLLT) promotes tissue repair, enhances wound healing, reduces inflammatory responses, and alleviates pain.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 56
Est. completion date January 10, 2024
Est. primary completion date January 5, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 50 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient who underwent vaginal delivery; 2. Had a grade 1 or grade 2 laceration; 3. Have undergone episiotomy; Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient who underwent cesarean section; 2. With Help Syndrome; 3. They presented immediate postpartum hemorrhage; 4. They had unstable vital signs in the immediate postpartum period;

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Low-Level Laser Therapy
The patient will be submitted to evaluation through a questionnaire, which will be the patient's evaluation form, which will be elaborated by the researcher (Appendix A). Next, pain and edema will be evaluated, using the VAS scales, Mc Gill scale and REEDA scale, after this process, the therapy will be applied, and the patient will be randomly selected for cryotherapy or LLLT. After application, the patient will be evaluated immediately and the scales applied again and after 24 hours.

Locations

Country Name City State
Brazil Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Brazil, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary To compare two techniques: Low-level laser and cryotherapy The use of low-level laser therapy or cryotherapy to alleviate pain. Cryotherapy was performed using a glove containing crushed ice, applied to the perineal region for 20 minutes, initiated within 12 hours postpartum. Patients were evaluated before the application, immediately after the application, and 24 hours after the application. Low-level laser therapy, as well as cryotherapy, was applied within 12 hours after delivery, targeting the site of the injury with red radiation. The applied dose was 3 joules, administered in a punctual manner, using a non-contact technique, with a distance of 2 cm between each point. Subsequently, infrared laser therapy was applied using conventional contact technique around the extent of the injury, with a punctual application of 6 joules, also maintaining a distance of 2 cm between each point. 24 horas
Secondary Pain reduction assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was applied before the intervention was performed, immediately after its implementation, and 24 hours later. 24 hours
Secondary Pain reduction assessed by McGill Pain Scale The McGill Pain Scale was applied before the technique was performed and again after 24 hours. 24 hours
Secondary Evaluate reduction of swelling using the REEDA scale. The REEDA scale was applied before the intervention was administered and again 24 hours after the intervention was performed. 24 hours
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT03280628 - Trial Comparing Cosmetic Outcomes of Pediatric Laceration Closure Using Skin Glue, Medical Tape Versus Stitches N/A
Completed NCT00451724 - Intranasal Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Pediatric Laceration Repair Phase 2
Completed NCT05240248 - Optilene® Suture Material for Dermal Sutures
Completed NCT02882256 - Video Discharge Instructions (VDI) as Adjuncts to Written Discharge Instructions in the Emergency Department N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02168439 - Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs Intranasal Midazolam as Anxiolysis Prior to Pediatric Laceration Repair Phase 4
Completed NCT03199456 - A Randomized Post-market Study to Evaluate Zip Device Compared to Sutures for Laceration Repair in Pediatrics and Adults N/A
Completed NCT03080467 - Long-Term Outcome of Pediatric Traumatic Wound Repair: Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive
Recruiting NCT05225714 - Dermal Wound Closure Using Silkam®
Active, not recruiting NCT01911351 - Nitrous Oxide Use in Minor Procedures N/A
Suspended NCT01268670 - The Addition of Oral Analgesics to LET During Laceration Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT04557761 - Comparison of microMend® Devices to Sutures in Closing Lacerations in Children N/A
Completed NCT05812352 - Supporting Laypeople Addressing Prehospital Hemorrhage Study N/A
Completed NCT00834730 - Comparison of N2O Inhalation and Ketamine in Pediatric PSA Phase 4
Completed NCT03053947 - Pain Free Laceration Repairs Using Intra-nasal Ketamine Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03681717 - Virtual Reality vs. Standard-of-Care for Comfort During Laceration Repair N/A
Completed NCT03071601 - Prospective Evaluation of Topical Analgesia for Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department Phase 4
Completed NCT05148390 - Study to Examine Clinical Performance and Safety of Cutimed® Gelling Fiber in Routine Clinical Practice
Not yet recruiting NCT06217081 - 3M™ Topical Tissue Adhesive Versus Commercially Available Tissue Adhesive for the Closure of Lacerations and Incisions N/A
Withdrawn NCT03499002 - Teaching Medical Students How to Suture: Standard Simulation vs in Situ N/A