Laceration Clinical Trial
— CLOfficial title:
Comparison of Low-Level Laser Therapy With Cryotherapy in Postpartum Women With Laceration and/or Episiotomy on Perineal and Vulvar Pain Reduction
Verified date | April 2024 |
Source | Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The changes that occur during pregnancy can lead to symptoms and complaints for women. Vaginal delivery has several benefits for both the mother and baby; however, during labor, some injuries may occur, such as lacerations and episiotomies. It is known that the postpartum period is when the body is involuting to its pre-pregnancy state. The perineal pain caused by these injuries during childbirth is a determining factor for recovery, and it may affect not only the physical but also the psychological well-being of women. Therefore, it is necessary to employ techniques that can alleviate pain and edema in the immediate postpartum period, directly influencing recovery. Objective: To compare the use of photobiomodulation with cryotherapy in the immediate postpartum period of 2 hours in parturients who suffered 1st and 2nd-degree lacerations and/or episiotomies. Methods: A randomized clinical trial will be conducted to compare two interventions. Data collection will be through a questionnaire and scales for the evaluation of pain and edema, with women who experienced vaginal delivery and those who suffered 1st and 2nd-degree lacerations or episiotomies. Expected results: Reduction of pain, edema, and inflammatory processes with non-pharmacological techniques, leading to greater comfort and better postpartum recovery.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 56 |
Est. completion date | January 10, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | January 5, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 50 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient who underwent vaginal delivery; 2. Had a grade 1 or grade 2 laceration; 3. Have undergone episiotomy; Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient who underwent cesarean section; 2. With Help Syndrome; 3. They presented immediate postpartum hemorrhage; 4. They had unstable vital signs in the immediate postpartum period; |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre | Porto Alegre |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul |
Brazil,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | To compare two techniques: Low-level laser and cryotherapy | The use of low-level laser therapy or cryotherapy to alleviate pain. Cryotherapy was performed using a glove containing crushed ice, applied to the perineal region for 20 minutes, initiated within 12 hours postpartum. Patients were evaluated before the application, immediately after the application, and 24 hours after the application. Low-level laser therapy, as well as cryotherapy, was applied within 12 hours after delivery, targeting the site of the injury with red radiation. The applied dose was 3 joules, administered in a punctual manner, using a non-contact technique, with a distance of 2 cm between each point. Subsequently, infrared laser therapy was applied using conventional contact technique around the extent of the injury, with a punctual application of 6 joules, also maintaining a distance of 2 cm between each point. | 24 horas | |
Secondary | Pain reduction assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). | The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was applied before the intervention was performed, immediately after its implementation, and 24 hours later. | 24 hours | |
Secondary | Pain reduction assessed by McGill Pain Scale | The McGill Pain Scale was applied before the technique was performed and again after 24 hours. | 24 hours | |
Secondary | Evaluate reduction of swelling using the REEDA scale. | The REEDA scale was applied before the intervention was administered and again 24 hours after the intervention was performed. | 24 hours |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT03280628 -
Trial Comparing Cosmetic Outcomes of Pediatric Laceration Closure Using Skin Glue, Medical Tape Versus Stitches
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00451724 -
Intranasal Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Pediatric Laceration Repair
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05240248 -
Optilene® Suture Material for Dermal Sutures
|
||
Completed |
NCT02882256 -
Video Discharge Instructions (VDI) as Adjuncts to Written Discharge Instructions in the Emergency Department
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02168439 -
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs Intranasal Midazolam as Anxiolysis Prior to Pediatric Laceration Repair
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03199456 -
A Randomized Post-market Study to Evaluate Zip Device Compared to Sutures for Laceration Repair in Pediatrics and Adults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03080467 -
Long-Term Outcome of Pediatric Traumatic Wound Repair: Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05225714 -
Dermal Wound Closure Using Silkam®
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01911351 -
Nitrous Oxide Use in Minor Procedures
|
N/A | |
Suspended |
NCT01268670 -
The Addition of Oral Analgesics to LET During Laceration Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04557761 -
Comparison of microMend® Devices to Sutures in Closing Lacerations in Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05812352 -
Supporting Laypeople Addressing Prehospital Hemorrhage Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00834730 -
Comparison of N2O Inhalation and Ketamine in Pediatric PSA
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03053947 -
Pain Free Laceration Repairs Using Intra-nasal Ketamine
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03681717 -
Virtual Reality vs. Standard-of-Care for Comfort During Laceration Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03071601 -
Prospective Evaluation of Topical Analgesia for Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05148390 -
Study to Examine Clinical Performance and Safety of Cutimed® Gelling Fiber in Routine Clinical Practice
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06217081 -
3M™ Topical Tissue Adhesive Versus Commercially Available Tissue Adhesive for the Closure of Lacerations and Incisions
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03499002 -
Teaching Medical Students How to Suture: Standard Simulation vs in Situ
|
N/A |