Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Aim: This study aimed to examine the effects of sacral massage and hot application on labor pain and comfort level perceptions in pregnant women.

Methods: This randomized controlled experimental study included hot application, massage and control groups, each having 30 primiparous pregnant women whose cervix was dilated to 4-5 cm. The intervention groups were given a sacral massage or sacral hot application, whereas the control group was given only standard midwifery care during 4-5, 6-7, and 8-9 cm cervical dilation. The data were collected using the Introductory Information Form, the Childbirth Comfort Questionnaire (CCQ), and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).


Clinical Trial Description

This randomized controlled experimental study was carried out between June and December 2016 in the delivery room of Public Hospital in Turkey.The sample size was determined using power calculations G*Power 3 with taking into account previous studies in which a effects massage and hot application on labor pain. Estimates of effects were derived from the findings of previous studies. The sample size was calculated at the 5% level of significance and a power of 95% based on previous studies (n = 30 in each group). The study sample consisted of primiparous pregnant women with vaginal delivery expectancy, term pregnancy, single healthy fetus, and active labor stage (4-5 cm dilation). A total of 98 primiparous pregnant women were included in the study, but 8 of them were excluded because of delivery by cesarean section. Thus, three research groups were formed as follows: massage, hot application, and control groups (n =30 in each group). Sacral massage and sacral hot application were applied to the intervention groups, and only standard midwifery care was given to the control group. Randomization was performed when each pregnant woman who was admitted to the hospital during labor and met the inclusion criteria. Randomization was provided with the collection of data on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays of each week during the study period. Sacral massage was applied on Mondays, sacral hot application was performed on Wednesdays, and data of the control group were collected on Fridays. Cervical dilation and effacement, contraction, fetal heartbeat rate, and vital findings were followed in the standard midwifery care. Midwives informed pregnant women about breathing and evacuation techniques. In addition, all pregnant women in labor process received induction application. Each study group was given a descriptive information form, Childbirth Comfort Questionnaire (CCQ), and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in the active stage of labor (4-5 cm cervical dilation). Standard midwifery care was given to each group, and intervention groups were interfered three times in total, during 4-5, 6-7, and 8-9 cm cervical dilation. Immediately after each intervention, NRS was administered between contractions. CCQ was also applied between contractions after the last intervention made during 8-9 cm cervical dilation. Pregnant women in the control group filled NRS during 4-5 and 6-7 cm cervical dilation, and CCQ during 8-9 cm cervical dilation. NRS was applied for the last time in all three groups 5 min after the third stage of labor.

Childbirth Comfort Questionnaire-CCQ: This scale was developed by Schuling and Sampselle (2003), and the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was carried out by Potur et al (2015). Potur et al. (2015) showed that the sociocultural subscale had item total score correlation coefficient less than 0.30, and the items showing the relief level were extracted from the scale. The CCQ consisted of physical, environmental, and psychospiritual subscales and a specific sense of relief and transcendence. It was a 5-point Likert-type scale with nine items. Each item scored between strongly disagree (1 point) to strongly agree (5 points). It is possible to score from 9 to 45 when all questions on the scale are answered. High score referred to high comfort and vice versa. In the present study, CCQ was applied two times in total, one before the intervention during 4-5 cm cervical dilation and one immediately after the intervention during 8-9 cm cervical dilation.

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS): This scale was used to evaluate pain levels.Subjects were asked to rate the level of their pain using the numbers from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) on this scale. In the present study, NRS was applied five times in total, one before the intervention, three times immediately after interventions (during 4-5, 6-7, and 8-9 cm cervical dilations) and one after delivery ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04382833
Study type Interventional
Source Balikesir University
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date June 2016
Completion date December 2016

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03539562 - Therapeutic Rest to Delay Admission in Early Labor: A Prospective Study on Morphine Sleep
Withdrawn NCT04662450 - Evaluation and Management of Parturients' Pain Intensity N/A
Completed NCT02885350 - Spinal or Epidural Fentanyl or Sufentanil for Labour Pain in Early Phase of the Labour Phase 4
Completed NCT02550262 - Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor N/A
Completed NCT01598506 - Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Labor Analgesia Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT01636999 - Comparing Sedara to Butorphanol in Early Labor N/A
Completed NCT00987441 - Epidural Labor Analgesia and Infant Neurobehavior N/A
Completed NCT00755092 - Effect of Doula in Nulliparas and Multiparas N/A
Terminated NCT00787176 - The Association Between Fluid Administration, Oxytocin Administration, and Fetal Heart Rate Changes N/A
Recruiting NCT06036797 - Efficacy and Safety of Hydromorphone-ropivacaine Versus Sufentanil-ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia Phase 2
Completed NCT05512065 - Changes in Velocimetric Indices of Uterine and Umbilical Arteries Before and After Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia in Laboring Women N/A
Completed NCT05327088 - Epidural Dexmedetomidine vs Nalbuphine for Labor Analgesia Phase 2
Completed NCT03103100 - Comparing Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, and a Combination of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine for Labor Epidural Activation Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03623256 - Comparison of Intrathecal Versus Epidural Fentanyl on Fetal Bradycardia in Labor Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT02271100 - Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique N/A
Completed NCT02926469 - Virtual Reality Analgesia in Labor: The VRAIL Pilot Study N/A
Completed NCT03712735 - Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus For Laboring Obstetrical Women Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05565274 - Outcome of Combined Tramadol and Paracetamol Versus Pentazocine as Labour Analgesia Among Parturients N/A
Recruiting NCT01708668 - The Effects of Intermittent Epidural Bolus on Fever During Labor Analgesia N/A
Recruiting NCT02575677 - Oxycodone in Treatment of Early Labour Pain Efficacy and Safety