View clinical trials related to Jaw, Edentulous.
Filter by:The study involves 20 patients who require implant treatment for the edentulous lower jaw, following specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients are drawn from the regular pool of those seeking implant therapy, with no additional recruitment efforts. This study compares the effects of loaded and non-loaded dental implants. Preoperative assessments include medical histories, clinical, and radiographic examinations of the jaw. Participants are thoroughly informed about the study procedures and consent to participate through signed agreements. They undergo preoperative diagnostics, including panoramic X-rays to evaluate mandibular bone height, and complete the OHIP-G 14 questionnaire to establish a baseline for their oral health-related quality of life. The implant placement involves standard outpatient surgical procedures under local anesthesia. The implants used are CE-certified and are placed in predetermined positions in the edentulous region. During the surgery intraoral scans and conventional impressions are performed. Post-operative care includes oral rinses, and radiographic assessments, with follow-up visits scheduled for suture removal and further assessments using the visual analog scale for pain and swelling. The healing phase spans four months, during which patients' comfort and oral health are monitored through clinical examinations and additional questionnaires. Follow-up after 4 months includes re-entry surgery and further radiographic evaluations and intraoral scans to assess the bone's response around the implants. Throughout the study, adverse events and patient satisfaction are continuously documented. In the later stages, regular follow-up visits for up to 24 months post-surgery to monitor implant stability and health through clinical and radiographic check-ups are performed. This study aims to document implant survival rates, peri-implant bone regeneration, assess biological and technical complications, and evaluate patient satisfaction and quality of life throughout the implant process, providing valuable data for future dental implant protocols.
In this study, it was aimed to compare the impressions taken with different impression techniques for the production of tissue-supported complete dentures from individuals with complete edentulous upper jaws. For this purpose, 15 individuals with complete edentulism in the upper jaw were asked to participate in the study. In addition to agreeing to participate in the study after reading the consent form, these individuals should have been using tissue-supported complete dentures in the upper jaw for at least 3 months. They should also have healthy mucosa without local factors such as tissue hyperplasia, atrophic crests, allergic reaction, epulis fissuratum. A total of five final impressions will then be taken from these individuals in two sessions. Two of these impressions will be obtained with the traditional method and three with the digital method. The traditional impression group will include one-step (ALG) and two-step (ZOE) impression techniques. The digital impression group will include the digital impression taken when the artificial intelligence is deactivated (A.I OFF), the digital impression taken when the artificial intelligence is activated (A.I ON) and the modified technique (MOD). In the first appointment, the first impressions will be taken for the traditional and digital groups. Intraoral exclusion and isolation will be provided before the digital first impression. With the A.I mode of the intraoral scanner (TRIOS4; 3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) deactivated, scanning will be performed in accordance with the scanning protocol recommended by the company. A metal stock tray suitable for the dental arch will then be selected for the preliminary impression of the traditional impression group. The impression will be taken in one step with irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. The impression will be digitized with the same intraoral scanner within the first 10 minutes after impression taking. Both impressions will be digitally transferred to the dental laboratory as stl data. Using computer aided design (CAD) software (Exocad DentalCAD 2.4 Plovdiv), an individual tray will be designed for the ZOE impression in the traditional group and a pedestal for the MOD impression in the digital impression group. The designs will be transferred to the computer aided manufacturing (CAM) unit and produced with a 3D printer using dental resin. The occlusal-rim (OR) will be prepared by adding wax on the base. In the second appointment, the cheek and lips will be excluded in the same way before scanning. For A.I OFF and A.I ON, recordings will be taken when the artificial intelligence is deactivated and activated, respectively. Then, occlusal vertical dimension, intermaxillary relationship and aesthetic parameters will be determined with OR before scanning for the MOD group. Reference areas will be created on the buccal and palatinal walls to facilitate scanning of the OR. To avoid retention problems during scanning, a silicone-based impression material with a fluid consistency will be applied to the tissue surface of the OR and placed in the mouth. Scanning will be performed according to the protocol proposed by Lo Russo et al. For the traditional impression group, the ALG impression will be taken with a metal stock tray using irreversible hydrocolloid impression material in a single step. The impression will be digitized with an intraoral scanner within ten minutes of completion. Then, the edges of the individual tray for ZOE will be shaped with impression compound to ensure peripheral closure. The impression will be completed with zinc-oxide eugenol impression material. The impression will be digitized. These measurements will then be compared using a reverse-engineering program (Geomagic design X version 2016.1.0, 3D Systems Inc. Rock Hill, SC). Before the comparison, in the same program, the parts to be evaluated on the ZOE in the conventional group and A.I OFF in the digital group will be divided into regions. These areas will be divided into four sections as right and left vestibular region, postdam area, hard palate region, except for the A.I OFF-MOD comparison group. In the A.I OFF-MOD comparison group, it will include the right and left initial areas, including the areas where scanning starts in the second scan of the MOD method. In addition, all measurements will be compared in terms of the whole surface and all measurement boundaries including the whole measurement surface as one. The comparison groups are ZOE-ALG, ZOE-A.I OFF, A.I OFF-A.I ON, A.I OFF-MOD. The measurements in the comparison groups will be overlapped first with the initial alignment and then with the best fit alignment algorithm. All sections will be evaluated individually with the "3D compare" feature and the amount of deviation in the areas to be evaluated will be determined.
The aims of this clinical study are: 1) to compare the accuracy of conventional versus digital impression techniques for implant impressions; 2) to assess the passive fit of the prosthesis constructed from the most accurate impression. Thirty edentulous patients who received 4 - 6 implant and indicated for implant-supported fixed prosthesis will be invited. Full-arch conventional and digital impressions will be made for each patient. Accuracy evaluation will be made and the prosthesis will be constructed from the most accurate impression. Passive fit of the zirconia implant-supported prostheses will be verified at the try-in stage clinically and radiographically.
complete denture wearers struggle to eat well with their dentures due to poor denture retention, stability, and occlusal disharmony. So, the current study protocol aims to compare the occlusion/ disocclusion time in immediately loaded implant retained overdentures supported by two interforaminal implants; splinted versus non splinted dental implants compared to the conventional complete denture.
Forty patients ( 24female and16 male )with completely edentulous maxilla and mandible . All patients received implant supported mandibular and maxillary overdentures. The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to attachments retaining Max IOD that supported by four axial implants in maxilla . The TA was used to retain group I (GrI) MaxIOD , while that of group II (Gr II) was retained by LA. MaxIOD retention and MBL(vertical and horizontal) around implants of both groups was recorded at time of insertion (R0) ,then twelve(R12)and (R24) months following insertion of the prosthesis.
To compare the accuracy of digital impression and conventional impression for complete-arch implant-supported fixed prosthesis
The goal of this split-mouth randomized clinical trial study was to investigate the effect of using a laser on pain and discomfort following flapless dental implant surgery. It was hypothesized that laser did not have any impact on post-op pain. Therefore, the study aimed to compare pain and discomfort following flapless dental implant surgeries with or without a laser.
To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of KS implants used to rehabilitate edentulous mandible with dental-retained overdentures, and to compare it with same treatment on TS implants
The aim of the present study was to evaluate open faced maxillary complete denture with soft acryl resin wing versus conventional heat cured maxillary complete denture regarding the retention and patient satisfaction.
CAD/CAM-fabricated PEEK bar exhibited greater dimensional deviation in comparison to its titanium counterpart. Nevertheless, patients with PEEK bars reported higher satisfaction levels and lower marginal bone loss when compared to those with titanium bars.