Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01030523
Other study ID # YA-SHO-0002
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 2009
Est. completion date March 22, 2022

Study information

Verified date March 2023
Source Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study, with the ASTRA TECH Implant System, is comparing short implants (OsseoSpeed™) to standard length implants (OsseoSpeed™) in combination with bone grafting. The hypothesis is that the use of short implants in posterior maxilla with inadequate bone is as safe and predictable as placing standard length implants in combination with bone augmentation.


Description:

This study was designed as an open, prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, 5-year follow-up investigation evaluating the outcome of treatment with the OsseoSpeed™ implant 6 mm placed in the posterior maxilla compared to treatment with OsseoSpeed™ implant 11, 13 or 15 mm placed after bone grafting. The study was during the conduct of the study amended to include a 10-year extension cohort.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 101
Est. completion date March 22, 2022
Est. primary completion date December 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 20 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Provision of informed consent - Aged 20-75 years at enrolment - History of edentulism in the study area of at least four months - In need for 1-4 implants in either side of the posterior maxilla (premolar and molar region) - Neighboring tooth/teeth to the planned implant/s must have natural root(s) or implant supported restoration, with absence of pathology or excessive bone loss, as judged by the investigator - Presence of natural tooth/teeth, partial prosthesis and/or implants in the opposite jaw in contact with the planned crown/s - Deemed by the investigator to have a bone height between 5 and 7 mm and a bone width of a minimum of 6 mm - Deemed by the investigator as likely to present an initially stable implant situation Exclusion Criteria: - Unlikely to be able to comply with study procedures, as judged by the investigator - Earlier bone graft procedures in the study area - Uncontrolled pathologic processes in the oral cavity - Known or suspected current malignancy - History of radiation therapy in the head and neck region - History of chemotherapy within 5 years prior to surgery - Systemic or local disease or condition that could compromise post-operative healing and/or osseointegration - Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus - Corticosteroids, iv bisphosphonates or any other medication that could influence post-operative healing and/or osseointegration - Smoking more than 10 cigarettes/day - Bruxism - Present alcohol and/or drug abuse - Involvement in the planning and conduct of the study (applies to both Astra Tech staff and staff at the study site) - Previous enrolment in the present study - Simultaneous participation in another clinical study

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S (length: 6 mm)
ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S (length: 6 mm)
ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ implants (lengths: 11, 13, 15 mm) in combination with bone grafting
ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ implants (lengths: 11, 13, 15 mm) in combination with bone grafting

Locations

Country Name City State
Austria Ärztegesellschaft für Zahn- Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Akademie für Orale Implantologie: Fürhauser, Haas, Mailath-Pokorny & Watzek OG Wien
Poland Aesthetic Dent Szczecin
Spain Facultad de Medicina y Odontologia, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela
Switzerland Zentrum für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde der Universität Zürich Zürich
United States Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Skeletal Development and Biomaterials, University of Connecticut, School of Dental Medicine Farmington Connecticut

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Austria,  Poland,  Spain,  Switzerland, 

References & Publications (4)

Pohl V, Thoma DS, Sporniak-Tutak K, Garcia-Garcia A, Taylor TD, Haas R, Hammerle CH. Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, c — View Citation

Schincaglia GP, Thoma DS, Haas R, Tutak M, Garcia A, Taylor TD, Hammerle CH. Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part — View Citation

Thoma DS, Haas R, Sporniak-Tutak K, Garcia A, Taylor TD, Hammerle CHF. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-Year dat — View Citation

Thoma DS, Haas R, Tutak M, Garcia A, Schincaglia GP, Hammerle CH. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demogra — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Implant Survival Rate Any implant that is removed after implant placement will be considered a failure, whatever the reason for removal. Implant survival will be evaluated clinically and radiographically by counting the number of remaining implants. Implant survival rate will be calculated by dividing the number of non-failures by the number of installed implant. 5 years after permanent restoration
Secondary Average Marginal Bone Level (MBL) Change From Permanent Restoration on Implant Level Marginal bone level will be determined from radiographs and expressed as the distance from a reference point on the implant to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact on the mesial and distal aspect of the implant. Marginal bone level expressed in millimetres at the 5 year follow-up visit will be compared to values obtained at delivery of permanent restoration. Positive value denotes gain of bone. Negative value denotes loss of bone. Time of permanent restoration and 5 years after permanent restoration
Secondary Average Marginal Bone Level (MBL) Change From Permanent Restoration on Implant Level Marginal bone level will be determined from radiographs and expressed as the distance from a reference point on the implant to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact on the mesial and distal aspect of the implant. Marginal bone level expressed in millimetres at the 10 year follow-up visit will be compared to values obtained for the 10-years cohort at delivery of permanent restoration. Positive value denotes gain of bone. Negative value denotes loss of bone. Time of permanent restoration and 10 years after permanent restoration
Secondary Condition of Periimplant Mucosa Measured Through Bleeding on Probing (BoP) Bleeding on Probing will be evaluated at four aspects per implant, i.e. mesially, distally, buccally and palatinally by using a periodontal probe. BoP will be recorded as presence or absence (Yes or No) of bleeding when probing to the bottom of the pocket. The proportion of surfaces that show presence of bleeding will be calculated and presented on a subject level. 5 years after permanent restoration
Secondary Condition of Periimplant Mucosa Measured Through Bleeding on Probing (BoP) Bleeding on Probing will be evaluated at four aspects per implant, i.e. mesially, distally, buccally and palatinally by using a periodontal probe. BoP will be recorded as presence or absence (Yes or No) of bleeding when probing to the bottom of the pocket. The proportion of surfaces that show presence of bleeding will be calculated and presented on a subject level for the 10-years extension cohort. 10 years after permanent restoration
Secondary Condition of Periimplant Mucosa Measure by Average Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) From Permanent Restoration PPD will be measured as the distance from the mucosal margin to the bottom of the probeable pocket in mm. A mean value will be calculated for each implant as well as for each subject. PPD changes in millimetres at the 5 year follow-up visit will be compared to values obtained at delivery of permanent restoration. Negative value denotes deeper pocket depth. Time of permanent restoration and 5 years after permanent restoration
Secondary Condition of Periimplant Mucosa Measure by Average Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) From Permanent Restoration PPD will be measured as the distance from the mucosal margin to the bottom of the probeable pocket in mm. A mean value will be calculated for each implant as well as for each subject. PPD changes in millimetres at the 10 year follow-up visit will be compared to values obtained at delivery of permanent restoration. Negative value denotes deeper pocket depth. Time of permanent restoration and 10 years after permanent restoration
Secondary Change in Overall Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-49) OHIP-49 is describing the consequences of different oral diseases and conditions. It contains 49 items (questions) divided into 7 domains which are; functional limitation, pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicap. OHIP-49 attempts to measure both the frequency and severity of oral problems on functional and psychosocial well-being. Responses are based on a Likert response, with scale range; 0 = never, 1 = hardly ever, 2 = occasionally, 3 = fairly often, 4 = very often, for each of the 49 questions with a higher score being related to a worse outcome. To facilitate assessment of perceived severity of impacts, each statement has a weight derived using the Thurstone's paired comparison technique to reflect the relative importance of each statement. The overall OHIP-49 include all 49 questions with a total minimum score of 0 and a maximum total score of 196, with a higher score being related to a worse outcome. At baseline (Visit 1 - screening and pre-surgical planning visit) and 5 years after permanent restoration
Secondary Change in Overall Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-49) OHIP-49 is describing the consequences of different oral diseases and conditions. It contains 49 items (questions) divided into 7 domains which are; functional limitation, pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicap. OHIP-49 attempts to measure both the frequency and severity of oral problems on functional and psychosocial well-being. Responses are based on a Likert response, with scale range; 0 = never, 1 = hardly ever, 2 = occasionally, 3 = fairly often, 4 = very often, for each of the 49 questions with a higher score being related to a worse outcome. To facilitate assessment of perceived severity of impacts, each statement has a weight derived using the Thurstone's paired comparison technique to reflect the relative importance of each statement. The overall OHIP-49 include all 49 questions with a total minimum score of 0 and a maximum total score of 196, with a higher score being related to a worse outcome. At baseline (Visit 1 - screening and pre-surgical planning visit) and 10 years after permanent restoration
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT02880891 - Effects of Splinted or Non-splinted Single-unit Crowns on Marginal Bone-level Alterations Around Implants N/A
Completed NCT00748241 - Study to Evaluate Implant Survival Rate of Astra Tech Fixture ST in the Posterior Maxilla With One-stage Surgery and Early Loading N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04066309 - Implant Retained Rehabilitation With Surgical and Prosthetic Digital Workflow N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04545840 - Prospective Neodent® Zirconia System Study
Active, not recruiting NCT06034067 - Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling for Implant Site Preparation N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04546269 - Fully Guided Versus Conventionally Guided Implant Placement by Dental Students N/A
Recruiting NCT02676661 - Evaluation of the Prevalence and Risk Factors for Patients With Peri-implant Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT02662361 - Evaluation of the Prevalence and Risk Factors for Patients With Peri-implant Disease:a Retrospective Study N/A
Completed NCT00906425 - Clinical Study Comparing Submerged Versus Trans-mucosal Healing of P.004 Implants in the Anterior Mandible and Maxilla N/A
Completed NCT03252106 - Long-term Effectiveness of Contour Augmentation in Sites With Early Implant Placement N/A
Completed NCT02975674 - Evaluation of MT-12 Implant Survival and Marginal Bone Loss N/A
Completed NCT01822223 - A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Laser-Ablated Implant-Abutments to Promote Tissue Healing N/A
Completed NCT00545818 - Study Comparing OsseoSpeed™ Implants of Two Different Lengths in the Upper and Lower Posterior Jaw N/A
Completed NCT00900822 - Straumann Bone Ceramic Versus BioOss in Sinus Elevation N/A
Completed NCT04017026 - Survival and Success Rates of 6mm Implants With a Micro-rough Surface After 4.5 - 18.2 Years in Function
Active, not recruiting NCT05315414 - Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Clinical Outcome of PrimeTaper EV Implant in Single Tooth Restorations N/A
Recruiting NCT02814149 - Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03319758 - Esthetic and Radiographic Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Placement With Thin or Dehiscence Buccal Bone Wall N/A
Completed NCT01842958 - Straumann Roxolid Multi-Center Study N/A
Completed NCT01821092 - Dimensional Changes of Peri-implant Facial Bone Phase 4