IUCD Complication Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical Outcomes of Vaginal Isonicotinic Acid Hydrazide (INH) Administration Prior to T380A Intrauterine Device Insertion in Women Delivered Only by Cesarean Delivery: a Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial
| Verified date | August 2021 |
| Source | Aswan University Hospital |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
To investigate whether vaginal isonicotinic acid hydrazide administered before intrauterine device (IUD) insertion reduces failed insertions, insertion-related complications and pain in in Women Delivered Only by Cesarean Delivery.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 220 |
| Est. completion date | August 1, 2021 |
| Est. primary completion date | June 30, 2021 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Female |
| Age group | 18 Years to 45 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Non-pregnant women - Women that did not receive any analgesics or Dinoprostone in the 24 hours prior to insertion - Women who delivered only by cesarean section Exclusion Criteria: - Women with any uterine abnormalities as congenital anomalies, endometrial lesions, adenomyosis, fibroids. - Those with a Category 3 or 4 conditions for intrauterine device insertion according to the WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria for contraceptive use - Allergy to isonicotinic acid hydrazide . - Women refuse to participate in the study |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Egypt | Aswan University Hospital | Aswan |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Aswan University Hospital |
Egypt,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | the difference in the pain intensity scores between the study groups | the difference in the pain intensity scores between the study groups at IUD insertion BY10 cm visual analog scale score where 0 denotes no pain and 10 denotes the most imaginable pain | 10 minutes | |
| Secondary | Provider ease of insertion | Provider ease of insertion was evaluated using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 cm where 0 denotes very easy insertion and 10 denotes a very difficult insertion. | 10 minutes | |
| Secondary | insertion time | IUD insertion time from speculum in to speculum out | 10 minutes |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT04517890 -
Transdermal Lidocaine Administration Prior to Insertion Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT04505943 -
Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone and Isonicotinic Acid Hydrazide Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT04500002 -
Isonicotinic Acid Hydrazide (INH) Pretreatment With Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone in Missed Abortion
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT04505917 -
Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in Women
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04500015 -
Vaginal Isonicotinic Acid Hydrazide Administration Prior to Intrauterine Device Insertion
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT04505657 -
Lidocaine Spray Plus Oral Celecoxib for Pain Control During Hysterosalpingography
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04500028 -
Vaginal Isonicotinic Acid Hydrazide Administration Prior to Insertion Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System
|
Phase 4 |