Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03373812
Other study ID # MMC17230-17CTIL
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received December 4, 2017
Last updated December 13, 2017
Start date January 1, 2018
Est. completion date January 2020

Study information

Verified date December 2017
Source Meir Medical Center
Contact Arie Nemet, Prof. (MD)
Phone +972-9-7471527
Email nemet.arik@gmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Involutional ptosis is a known eyelid pathology in which the eyelid margin obscures part of the visual axis (MRD1).Patients usually complains of visual field disturbance, deterioration in quality of life and a poor cosmetic appearance.

In clinical practice, two main surgical approaches are performed to the repair of involutional ptosis:

1. anterior approach - skin incision and levator muscle insertion advancement.

2. posterior approach - eyelid reversion and tarsectomy Both approaches has its pro's and con's, but to this date, no solid evidence exists to prove which of these techniques is superior in manner of anatomical and functional results.

in this prospective study, patients with involutional ptosis will be randomized to each of surgical approaches groups, parameters concerning surgical and post surgical periods will be evaluated.


Description:

Involutional ptosis is a known eyelid pathology in which the eyelid margin obscures part of the visual axis (MRD1).Patients usually complains of visual field disturbance, deterioration in quality of life and a poor cosmetic appearance.

In clinical practice, two main surgical approaches are performed to the repair of involutional ptosis:

1. anterior approach - skin incision and levator muscle insertion advancement.

2. posterior approach - eyelid reversion and tarsectomy Both approaches has its pro's and con's, but to this date, no solid evidence exists to prove which of these techniques is superior in manner of anatomical and functional results.

in this prospective study, patients with involutional ptosis will be randomized to each of surgical approaches groups, parameters concerning surgical and post surgical periods will be evaluated.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 120
Est. completion date January 2020
Est. primary completion date January 1, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 100 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Involutional ptosis

- No previous eyelid surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

- Previous eyelid surgery or trauma

- Congenital ptosis

- Previous glaucoma filtrartion surgery

- Unwillingness for six months followup

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Blepharoptosis repair
levator advancement or mullerectomy

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Meir Medical Center

References & Publications (5)

Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology. 2005 Aug;112(8):1463-8. — View Citation

Chang S, Lehrman C, Itani K, Rohrich RJ. A systematic review of comparison of upper eyelid involutional ptosis repair techniques: efficacy and complication rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan;129(1):149-57. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230a1c7. Review. Erratum in: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 May;135(5):1507. — View Citation

Liu D. Ptosis repair by single suture aponeurotic tuck. Surgical technique and long-term results. Ophthalmology. 1993 Feb;100(2):251-9. — View Citation

Patel RM, Aakalu VK, Setabutr P, Putterman AM. Efficacy of Muller's Muscle and Conjunctiva Resection With or Without Tarsectomy for the Treatment of Severe Involutional Blepharoptosis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jul/Aug;33(4):273-278. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000748. — View Citation

Sohrab MA, Lissner GS. Comparison of Fasanella-Servat and Small-Incision Techniques for Involutional Ptosis Repair. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):98-101. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000417. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary MRD1 Distance in millimeters between corneal light reflex and upper eyelid margin 6 months
Primary surgery duration Time from first incision to last suture (in minutes) 3 hours
Primary Levator function change (in millimeters) in upper eyelid position from downgaze to maximal upgaze 6 months
Secondary Need for additional eyelid surgery Any need for oculoplastic additional surgical interventions (Descriptive) 6 months
Secondary Eyelid or ocular secondary disease Descriptive 6 months