Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

After endotracheal intubation verifying the location of endotracheal tube is of utmost importance. Many methods have been applied but none is perfect. The standard practice in the investigator's center has been to use auscultation of chest with capnography.

Ultrasound machines are now gaining popularity and their access extends from operation theatres, emergency rooms and even many primary health centres. Both capnography and ultrasonography are safe.

This study found out that Ultrasonography and waveform capnography are both reliable methods of confirming endotracheal tube position. The use of ultrasound could help reduce time and increase precision of confirming endotracheal tube position. Ultrasound can confirm endotracheal tube position before manual bag ventilations, and thus may prevent aspiration of gastric contents into patient's lungs.


Clinical Trial Description

This was a prospective, observational study conducted at the Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH) and Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Center (MCVTC) operating rooms from January 2017 to July 2017. Ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the Department of Anaesthesiology, Maharajgunj Medical College (MMC) was taken. Written informed consent was taken.

ASA I and II patients over 16 years of age were included in this study. Patients with difficult airway and anticipated difficult intubation, respiratory diseases, poor functional status, emergency case, and patients at risk of aspiration were excluded.

The diagnostic characteristics of real-time, suprasternal, transtracheal ultrasonography and capnography were tested by calculating their respective sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), accuracies and likelihood ratios. Comparison of time taken for confirmation of endotracheal tube position from the beginning of laryngoscopy, by ultrasonography versus capnography was done using t-statistics.

The degree of agreement of result between ultrasonography and capnography was tested with kappa statistics.

Out of the 95 patients studied, 11 had oesophageal intubation (Incidence of 11.57%). The overall accuracy of both ultrasonography and capnography was 96.84%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ultrasonography were 97.62% (91.66% - 99.71%), 90.91% (58.72% - 99.77%), 98.80% (92.67% - 99.81%), 83.33% (55.66% - 95.22%) respectively; and that for capnography were 96.43% (89.92% - 99.26%), 100% (71.51% - 100%), 100% (100% - 100%) and 78.57% (54.69% - 91.76%) respectively.

The likelihood ratio of a positive and a negative result for ultrasonography were 10.74 and 0.03 respectively, and that for capnography were infinity and 0.04 respectively.

The kappa value was 0.749 (95% CI: 0.567 - 0.931) which meant a good degree of agreement of result between these two methods.

The average time taken for confirmation of endotracheal tube by ultrasonography and capnography were 26.79 ± 7.64 seconds and 43.03 ± 8.71 seconds (mean ± standard deviation) respectively. The median time for confirmation was 26 seconds with interquartile range [15 - 37] seconds for ultrasonography and 42 seconds with interquartile range [29 - 55] seconds for capnography. Ultrasonography was found to be faster than capnography by 16.36 ± 3.23 seconds (mean ± standard deviation) and the difference in time was significant (p = 0.011).

During the study, one patient had unanticipated difficult intubation, and four had hypotension after induction of anaesthesia. These patients were excluded from the study and no sequalae of hypotension was seen in the patients, or no hypoxemia occured in the patient with unanticipated difficult intubation. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04316988
Study type Observational
Source Tribhuvan University, Nepal
Contact
Status Completed
Phase
Start date January 17, 2017
Completion date August 15, 2017

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03277872 - NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope N/A
Suspended NCT04253795 - Nonintubated Versus Intubated Anesthesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT02864017 - Immuno Nutrition by L-citrulline for Critically Ill Patients N/A
Completed NCT02900807 - CT-scan Airways Mensuration - Correlation to External Measurements
Completed NCT01823328 - Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation Phase 4
Completed NCT02350933 - Endoscopic Evaluation of the Paediatric Airway After Prior Prolonged (>24 h) Tracheal Intubation N/A
Completed NCT01170455 - Nasal Intubation Using the Blind Intubation Device N/A
Completed NCT00980590 - Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Lying on the Ground N/A
Completed NCT05515107 - The Laryngoscopic View With C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Miller Blade Lifting the Epiglottis or the Vallecula in Children N/A
Completed NCT06249659 - Impact of Extubation Location After Surgery on Perioperative Times
Completed NCT03677505 - KoMAC Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Intubation N/A
Completed NCT03328182 - Assessment of an Oral Endotracheal Subglottic Tube Holder N/A
Recruiting NCT02073786 - Rigid Video Stylet Vs Conventional Lightwand Intubation N/A
Recruiting NCT02277652 - Endotracheal Intubation Devices N/A
Recruiting NCT02277405 - Pediatric Intubation During Resuscitation N/A
Completed NCT02277418 - Venner a.p. Advance Video Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT01003327 - Comparison of the I-gel Laryngeal Mask and the Classic Laryngeal Mask in Patients With a BMI>25 Phase 4
Completed NCT00956592 - Clinical Evaluation of the Storz CMAC Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT00783731 - Low Dose of Midazolam is Superior to Conventional Dose for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Emergency Department (ED) N/A
Recruiting NCT03887897 - First Attempt Intubation Rate With Airtraq vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope N/A