Intubation Clinical Trial
Official title:
Thyromental Height Test as a New Method for Prediction of Difficult Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy
The purpose of this study is to assess the usefulness of the Thyromental Height Test in prediction of difficult intubation using videolaryngoscopy and double lumen endotracheal tubes in patients scheduled for elective thoracic procedures.
Successful and fast intubation are crucial for the safety of general anaesthesia. Failed
intubation and acute hypoxia remain among the major contributing factors of anaesthesia
related deaths. Difficult intubation prevalence in literature is very inconsistent and varies
between 1.5-20% of cases in general population, to even 50% in obese Thai population.
There is a number of anthropometric scales and tests used for predicting difficult
intubation. However, none of them appears to be sensitive and specific enough to effectively
predict difficult intubation.
Recently, simple and non-invasive test predicting difficult intubation was
introduced-thyromental height test (TMHT). It shows promise as a more effective substitution
for frequently cited anthropometric measures. It is based on the height between the anterior
border of the thyroid cartilage and the anterior border of the mentum, measured while the
patient lies in the supine position with closed mouth The main objective of the trial is to
assess the clinical usefulness of TMHT in prediction of difficult intubation using
videolaryngoscopy and double lumen endotracheal tubes in patients scheduled for elective
thoracic surgical procedures. The secondary aim is to evaluate usefulness of other commonly
used predictive tests associated with difficult intubation.
During routine, preoperative anaesthetic visit thyromental height, thyromental distance,
sternomental distance and Mallampati scale score are assessed. Then, during videolaryngoscopy
and intubation, score in Cormack-Lehane scale and occurrence of difficult intubation are
noted.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03277872 -
NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope
|
N/A | |
Suspended |
NCT04253795 -
Nonintubated Versus Intubated Anesthesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02864017 -
Immuno Nutrition by L-citrulline for Critically Ill Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02900807 -
CT-scan Airways Mensuration - Correlation to External Measurements
|
||
Completed |
NCT01823328 -
Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02350933 -
Endoscopic Evaluation of the Paediatric Airway After Prior Prolonged (>24 h) Tracheal Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01170455 -
Nasal Intubation Using the Blind Intubation Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00980590 -
Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Lying on the Ground
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05515107 -
The Laryngoscopic View With C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Miller Blade Lifting the Epiglottis or the Vallecula in Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06249659 -
Impact of Extubation Location After Surgery on Perioperative Times
|
||
Completed |
NCT03677505 -
KoMAC Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03328182 -
Assessment of an Oral Endotracheal Subglottic Tube Holder
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02073786 -
Rigid Video Stylet Vs Conventional Lightwand Intubation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02277652 -
Endotracheal Intubation Devices
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02277405 -
Pediatric Intubation During Resuscitation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02277418 -
Venner a.p. Advance Video Laryngoscope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01003327 -
Comparison of the I-gel Laryngeal Mask and the Classic Laryngeal Mask in Patients With a BMI>25
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00956592 -
Clinical Evaluation of the Storz CMAC Laryngoscope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00783731 -
Low Dose of Midazolam is Superior to Conventional Dose for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Emergency Department (ED)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03887897 -
First Attempt Intubation Rate With Airtraq vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope
|
N/A |