Intubation Clinical Trial
Official title:
Phase 4 Study of Succinylcholine Versus Rocuronium as Neuromuscular Blocking Agent for Emergency Intubation in Intensive Care
Emergency intubation of patients in intensive care is a high-risk endeavour. For many decades, succinylcholine has been the neuromuscular blocking agent of choice. However, succinylcholine may have life-threatening side effects and is contraindicated in a variety of diseases relevant in intensive care. The nondepolarizing agent rocuronium has been propagated as alternative for succinylcholine. Though a recent meta-analysis found no difference in intubating conditions between succinylcholine and rocuronium in elective cases, there are no data in emergent cases in intensive care. The aim of the present study is to compare succinylcholine and rocuronium with regard to 1) quality of intubating conditions, 2) length of the intubating sequence, 3) failed intubating attempts, 4) hemodynamic sequelae of intubation, and 5) desaturations.
Objective: to compare succinylcholine and rocuronium with regard to 1) quality of intubating
conditions, 2) length of the intubating sequence, 3) failed intubating attempts, 4)
hemodynamic sequelae of intubation, and 5) desaturations.
Design: prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Setting: Intensive care units of an
University Hospital. Patients: adult patients in intensive care requiring emergency
intubation. Randomization: 1:1 randomization to either succinylcholine (1mg/kg) or
rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg).
Data: 1) assessment of the quality of intubating conditions by means of a score, 2) length
of the intubating sequence defined as time between injection of neuromuscular blocking agent
and first end-tidal CO2 on the monitor, 3) number of failed intubating attempts, 4)
hemodynamic sequelae of intubation, defined as events requiring injection of vasoactive
drugs, and 5) desaturations, defined as saturation below 90% and/or any decrease in
saturation of 5% or more.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03277872 -
NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope
|
N/A | |
Suspended |
NCT04253795 -
Nonintubated Versus Intubated Anesthesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02864017 -
Immuno Nutrition by L-citrulline for Critically Ill Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02900807 -
CT-scan Airways Mensuration - Correlation to External Measurements
|
||
Completed |
NCT01823328 -
Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02350933 -
Endoscopic Evaluation of the Paediatric Airway After Prior Prolonged (>24 h) Tracheal Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01170455 -
Nasal Intubation Using the Blind Intubation Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00980590 -
Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Lying on the Ground
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05515107 -
The Laryngoscopic View With C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Miller Blade Lifting the Epiglottis or the Vallecula in Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06249659 -
Impact of Extubation Location After Surgery on Perioperative Times
|
||
Completed |
NCT03677505 -
KoMAC Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03328182 -
Assessment of an Oral Endotracheal Subglottic Tube Holder
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02073786 -
Rigid Video Stylet Vs Conventional Lightwand Intubation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02277405 -
Pediatric Intubation During Resuscitation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02277652 -
Endotracheal Intubation Devices
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02277418 -
Venner a.p. Advance Video Laryngoscope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00956592 -
Clinical Evaluation of the Storz CMAC Laryngoscope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01003327 -
Comparison of the I-gel Laryngeal Mask and the Classic Laryngeal Mask in Patients With a BMI>25
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00783731 -
Low Dose of Midazolam is Superior to Conventional Dose for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Emergency Department (ED)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03887897 -
First Attempt Intubation Rate With Airtraq vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope
|
N/A |