Intubation; Difficult Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized Trial on Comparison of Effects of Two Lightwand Intubation Techniques on Cervical Spine Motion: Laryngoscope-assisted vs. Conventional Lightwand Intubation
The aim of the study is to compare the effect of the laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation technique vs. the conventional lightwand intubation technique on the cervical spine motion during intubation in patients with the simulated cervical immobilization.
In clinical practice, the investigators have occasionally experienced some difficulties in the lightwand intubation in patients with cervical spine instability because manual in-line stabilization during intubation hinders free movements of the lightwand such as advancement, withdrawal, and scooping in the oral cavity. For this reason, jaw thrust is often used to secure enough space for free movements of the lightwand in the oral cavity in the traditional lightwand intubation technique. A recent study showed that laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation provided more successful intubation on the first attempt and less scooping movement than the traditional lightwand intubation by facilitating free movements of the lightwand in the oral cavity in patients with cervical immobilization during intubation for cervical spine surgery. In the laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation technique, the direct laryngoscope may provide sufficient space for free movements of the lightwand in the oral cavity without jaw thrust, which can result in cervical spine movement. However, the effect of the laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation technique on cervical spine motion is not investigated yet. ;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02922595 -
Comparison of iLTS-D® and ILMA® for Intubation With Fiberoptic Control
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02051400 -
Evaluation of McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01965938 -
RIFL (Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope) vs. Fiberoptic Bronchoscope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02769819 -
Identification of Morphological Characteristics to Predict Difficult Endotracheal Intubation Using a Flexible Fiberscope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02362568 -
Study of Interest on Cervical Ultrasound Exploration for Association With Difficult Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01692522 -
Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Ambu Aura-i Versus AirQ in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03035786 -
Airway Code Calls - Survey of Management
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02290249 -
Intubation of a Pediatric Manikin in Difficult Airway by Novice Personnel: A Comparison of Glidescope and Airtraq
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02326896 -
MACOCHA Score Predicts Intubation Failure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01984970 -
McGrath Series 5 Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Tube Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01474213 -
Sedation Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Remifentanil to Fibreoptic Intubation
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT00464490 -
Use of Dexmedetomidine to Facilitate Extubation in Surgical ICU Patients Who Failed Previous Weaning Attempts
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01375634 -
Nasogastric Tube Insertion Using Midazolam in the Emergency Department
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01464489 -
Intubation Time With Low Dose Rocuronium
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01075789 -
Using Lignocaine Spray and Gel to Reduce the Pain Associated With Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02501577 -
Comparison of Various Supraglottic Airway Devices for Fiberoptical Guided Tracheal Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02566135 -
I-gel Versus Classic-Laryngeal Mask Airway (C-LMA) as a Conduit for Tracheal Intubation Using Ventilating Bougie
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02493478 -
Improving Safety and Quality of Tracheal Intubation Practice in Pediatric ICUs
|
||
Completed |
NCT02198742 -
A Comparison Between Two Video Laryngoscopes,in Successfully Intubating Pediatric Mannequins w/wo Difficult Airways
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02788253 -
Mallampati Classification vs Best Visible Mallampati for Prediction of Difficult Tracheal Intubation
|