Intubation; Difficult Clinical Trial
Official title:
McGRATH MAC Video Laryngoscope - To View or Not To View?
NCT number | NCT02250521 |
Other study ID # | HSC-MS-14-0365 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | August 2014 |
Est. completion date | June 2016 |
Verified date | October 2018 |
Source | The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study was designed to determine the first attempt success rate of tracheal intubation with the McGRATH™ MAC laryngoscope using direct visualization in patients with known difficult airways, as well as exploring the possibility of identifying a particular direct Cormack-Lehane (C-L) grade view where indirect (video) visualization can be most beneficial during laryngoscopy and intubation.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 100 |
Est. completion date | June 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - BMI < 50 kg/m2 - Two or more of the following inclusion criteria: Mallampati class: III-IV; Reduced mouth opening < 4 cm; Neck circumference > 40 cm for females and > 43 cm for males; Thyromental distance < 6 cm; Ratio of the patient's height to thyromental distance = 23.5; Sternomental distance < 12 cm Exclusion Criteria: - BMI = 50 kg/m2 - emergency status - cervical injury or pathology - neck irradiation - known difficult airway - risk of gastric aspiration - hemodynamic instability - requiring rapid sequence intubation |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston | Houston | Texas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston | Medtronic - MITG |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants Successfully Intubated on First Attempt With Use of Either a Direct or Indirect Laryngoscopic View | All 100 patients will be intubated using the McGRATH® MAC video laryngoscope, either through direct or indirect vision laryngoscopy. The LCD monitor of the McGRATH™ MAC was initially covered; if the anesthesiologist visualized a modified C-L grade 1-3 view, the patient was intubated utilizing this direct view. If the anesthesiologist observed a modified C-L grade 4 view during their initial direct view, the patient was intubated using the indirect method. If intubation via direct laryngoscopy was unsuccessful on the first attempt, the patient was intubated using the indirect view. If both methods of laryngoscopy were unsuccessful, the rescue intubation technique was performed at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. | after successful endotracheal tube placement | |
Secondary | Glottic View With Direct Laryngoscopy | Glottic view as described by Cormack and Lehane, scored as follows- Grade 1. Full view of glottis Grade 2a. Partial view of glottis Grade 2b. Arytenoids or posterior portion of cords just visible Grade 3. Only the epiglottis visible Grade 4. Neither epiglottis nor glottis visible | at the time of laryngoscopy | |
Secondary | Glottic View With Indirect Laryngoscopy | Glottic view as described by Cormack and Lehane (Samsoon GL, Young JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: A retrospective study. Anesthesia 1987; 42:487), scored as follows- Grade 1. Full view of glottis Grade 2a. Partial view of glottis Grade 2b. Arytenoids or posterior portion of cords just visible Grade 3. Only the epiglottis visible Grade 4. Neither epiglottis nor glottis visible | at the time of laryngoscopy | |
Secondary | Time for Direct View Laryngoscopy During the First Attempt | Time from mouth opening to best direct laryngoscopic view | at the time of laryngoscopy | |
Secondary | Time for Indirect View Laryngoscopy During the First Attempt | Time from mouth opening to best indirect laryngoscopic view | at the time of laryngoscopy | |
Secondary | Time for Intubation | Time for laryngoscopy (either direct or indirect) plus the time for endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff to pass vocal cords. | at the time of laryngoscopy | |
Secondary | Number of Intubation Attempts | at the time of intubation | ||
Secondary | Number of Participants Who Received External Laryngeal Manipulation During the First Attempt | at the time of intubation | ||
Secondary | Number of Participants on Whom Bougie (Introducer) Was Used to Facilitate Intubation on the First Attempt | at the time of intubation | ||
Secondary | Subjective Ease of Laryngoscopy | The anesthesiologists rated the McGRATH™ MAC's ability in managing airways as "very easy," "easy," "slight resistance," "difficult," or "not possible." The difficulty of laryngoscopy was evaluated during the insertion and placement of the McGRATH™ MAC, from the patient's lips, into their oropharynx, until a glottic view was obtained. | at the time of laryngoscopy | |
Secondary | Subjective Ease of Intubation | The anesthesiologists rated the McGRATH™ MAC's ability in managing airways as "very easy," "easy," "slight resistance," "difficult," or "not possible." The difficulty of endotracheal tube (ETT) delivery (that is, intubation) was evaluated during the insertion of the ETT into the patient's mouth, until the ETT passed the vocal cords. | at the time of laryngoscopy |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02922595 -
Comparison of iLTS-D® and ILMA® for Intubation With Fiberoptic Control
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02051400 -
Evaluation of McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01965938 -
RIFL (Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope) vs. Fiberoptic Bronchoscope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02769819 -
Identification of Morphological Characteristics to Predict Difficult Endotracheal Intubation Using a Flexible Fiberscope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02362568 -
Study of Interest on Cervical Ultrasound Exploration for Association With Difficult Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01692522 -
Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Ambu Aura-i Versus AirQ in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03035786 -
Airway Code Calls - Survey of Management
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02290249 -
Intubation of a Pediatric Manikin in Difficult Airway by Novice Personnel: A Comparison of Glidescope and Airtraq
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02326896 -
MACOCHA Score Predicts Intubation Failure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01984970 -
McGrath Series 5 Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Tube Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01474213 -
Sedation Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Remifentanil to Fibreoptic Intubation
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT00464490 -
Use of Dexmedetomidine to Facilitate Extubation in Surgical ICU Patients Who Failed Previous Weaning Attempts
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02430415 -
Laryngoscope-assisted Lightwand Intubation and Cervical Spine Motion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01464489 -
Intubation Time With Low Dose Rocuronium
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01375634 -
Nasogastric Tube Insertion Using Midazolam in the Emergency Department
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT01075789 -
Using Lignocaine Spray and Gel to Reduce the Pain Associated With Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02501577 -
Comparison of Various Supraglottic Airway Devices for Fiberoptical Guided Tracheal Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02566135 -
I-gel Versus Classic-Laryngeal Mask Airway (C-LMA) as a Conduit for Tracheal Intubation Using Ventilating Bougie
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02493478 -
Improving Safety and Quality of Tracheal Intubation Practice in Pediatric ICUs
|
||
Completed |
NCT02198742 -
A Comparison Between Two Video Laryngoscopes,in Successfully Intubating Pediatric Mannequins w/wo Difficult Airways
|
Phase 1 |