Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05843565
Other study ID # BIO-2022-0348
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date June 14, 2023
Est. completion date June 1, 2025

Study information

Verified date June 2023
Source American University of Beirut Medical Center
Contact Marie Aouad-Maroun, MD
Phone +9611350000
Email mm01@aub.edu.lb
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this prospective randomized cross over clinical trial is to compare the difference in the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) between two different video laryngoscopy blades, the hyperangulated Cobalt blade and the straight Miller blade in neonates or small infants with body weight ≤ 5 kg and age ≤ 3 months. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is there a significant difference in the POGO using the standard Miller video laryngoscope blade versus the non-standard hyperangulated Cobalt video laryngoscope blade in neonates and small infants? - Are there significant differences in the first attempt success rate at intubation, the number of attempts, the time to successful intubation, the type of blade used for successful intubation, and the occurrence of adverse events during intubation, such as episodes of bradycardia or desaturation? 40 (20 in each group) neonates or small infants with body weight ≤ 5 kg or age ≤ 3 months will be enrolled in one of the two groups over 2 years of work. Researchers will compare the POGO and Cormack and Lehane (C&L) classification using the hyperangulated Cobalt blade versus the straight Miller blade to identify the technique that provides optimal glottic views and intubating conditions in this patient population, and thus improved patient's safety.


Description:

A higher incidence of difficult airway has been reported in neonates and infants than in adults. Optimizing glottic view during tracheal intubation is very challenging in neonates and small infants and it is not clear whether the design of the intubating blade using video laryngoscopy has a major influence of the glottic view and subsequently on the success of intubation. The primary objective of this study is to compare the difference in the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) between two different video laryngoscopy blades, the hyperangulated Cobalt blade and the straight Miller blade. The secondary objectives are the first attempt success rate at intubation, the number of attempts, the time to successful intubation, and the occurrence of adverse events during intubation, such as desaturation or bradycardia. In this prospective randomized cross over clinical trial, 40 (20 in each group) neonates or small infants with body weight ≤ 5 kg or age ≤ 3 months will be enrolled in one of two groups over 1 year of work. In patients allocated to the Cobalt group, the POGO and Cormack and Lehane (C&L) classification will be recorded using video laryngoscopy with a Cobalt blade followed by an assessment using the Miller blade. In patients allocated to the Miller group, the POGO and C&L classification will be recorded using video laryngoscopy with a Miller blade followed by an assessment using the Cobalt blade. In both groups, intubation will be attempted during the second assessment. If the first attempt at intubation fails, the subsequent attempts will be left at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Data comparing straight and hyperangulated video laryngoscopy blades in neonates and small infants are limited. Both techniques are standard of care at our institution. This study will identify the technique that provides optimal glottic views and intubating conditions in this patient population, and thus improved patient's safety.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date June 1, 2025
Est. primary completion date June 1, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 1 Month to 3 Months
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Neonates or small infants with body weight = 5 kg or age = 3 months, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. - ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class I-III patients. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with a history of difficult airway or with craniofacial and airway anomalies. - ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class IV patients. - Recent respiratory tract infection within the last 2 weeks.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Cobalt video laryngoscope blade
Non-standard hyperangulated Cobalt video laryngoscope blade
Miller video laryngoscope blade
Standard Miller video laryngoscope blade

Locations

Country Name City State
Lebanon American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
American University of Beirut Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Lebanon, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary POGO % Percentage of Glottic Opening Intraoperatively
Secondary C&L classification Cormack and Lehane classification for glottic view. Intraoperatively
Secondary Type of blade used for successful intubation Miller blade or Cobalt blade Intraoperatively
Secondary Intubation attempts Number of intubation attempts. Intraoperatively
Secondary Time to successful tracheal intubation Anesthesia timeline (seconds) from first intubation attempt to first EtCO2 detection Intraoperatively
Secondary Adverse events during intubation Occurrence of events such as: Desaturation (SpO2 < 95%) and bradycardia. Intraoperatively
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05535127 - Sequential Strategy vs Palpation vs Routine Ultrasound for Detection of Cricothyroid Membrane N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05036460 - Real-time Sonography in Detecting Inadvertent Esophageal Intubation Among Difficult Intubation Patients N/A
Completed NCT05303948 - Evaluation of Two Positions for Free Floating Tracheal Intubation in Weightlessness N/A
Completed NCT06107751 - Ramped and Sniffing Position for Cesarean Section Intubation. N/A
Completed NCT04089540 - New Intubation Method to Achieve Circulatory Stability and to Reduce Number of Intubation Attempts in Neonates N/A
Completed NCT05522049 - Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Using Macintosh vs.Hyperangulated Blades in Patients With Expected Difficult Intubation N/A
Completed NCT03046966 - Manikin To Patient Intubation: Does It Translate? N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05130645 - Evaluation of Mandibular Mental Angle and Mandibular Profile Angle
Completed NCT06042829 - Impact of Covid-19 Aerosol Box On Intubation Success Rate N/A
Completed NCT06138119 - The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Fiberoptic Intubation Performance N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06115694 - Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy With Rigid Stylet vs Video Laryngoscopy With the TCI Articulating Introducer for Endotracheal Intubation in Simulated Difficult Airways N/A
Completed NCT05243758 - Who is Rapid And Success? The Comparison Of Video Fiberscope And Video Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT04833166 - Comparing Full vs. Partial Glottis View Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient N/A
Completed NCT03118596 - Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs N/A
Recruiting NCT05680909 - Evaluation of SaCo Videolaryngeal Mask Airway in Morbidly Obese
Recruiting NCT05429112 - Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for Intubation With a Videolaryngoscopy in ICU (VIDEOL-FLEXTIP) N/A
Completed NCT05833347 - Evaluation of Difficult Laryngoscopy With Ultrasonography in Pediatric Patients
Completed NCT05366582 - Neural Integrity Monitor Electromyogram (NIM-EMG) Endotracheal Tube Intubation With Video Laryngoscope N/A
Recruiting NCT06322719 - Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU N/A
Recruiting NCT06213389 - Comparison of EzVision® Videolaryngoscope and Gum Elastic Bougie-Assisted Machintosh Laryngoscopy N/A