Intubation; Difficult or Failed Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized Comparison of Ambu® AuraGain™ Laryngeal Mask Airway and I-gel in Patients With Simulated Cervical Immobilization
Verified date | July 2019 |
Source | Seoul National University Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The supraglottic airway device(SAD), as an alternative to the endotracheal tube is inserted
into the oral cavity and seals the upper esophagus and the surrounding tissue, effectively
securing airway. SAD has evolved in recent years to increase efficiency and secure safety.
The recently developed Ambu® AuraGain™ is a second-generation SAD with a built-in gastric
port and is designed to be fitted well in the larynx and oral cavity after insertion because
the shaft is bent at an angle of 90 degrees and has an inflatable cuff.
In a previous study, Ambu® AuraGain™ showed a higher sealing pressure and better fibreoptic
finding compared to LMA Supreme in laparoscopic surgery.
On the other hand, I-gel and Ambu® AuraGain™, both of the second-generation SAD, show
comparatively excellent performance according to the results of previous studies. However,
there are no studies comparing the characteristics of two airway devices in adults.
The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of I-gel and Ambu® AuraGain™ to make
a difficult airway-like situation using cervical collar for adult patients receiving
mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 104 |
Est. completion date | October 12, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | September 27, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 20 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients who are undergoing surgery under general anesthesia where supraglottic airway management will be appropriate. Exclusion Criteria: - Body mass index > 35 kg/m2 - High risk of regurgitation (hiatus hernia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, non-fasting status) - Criteria for difficult airway - Patients with cervical disease or previous cervical spine surgery |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | Seoul National University Hospital | Seoul |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Seoul National University Hospital |
Korea, Republic of,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Oropharyngeal leak pressure | Oropharyngeal leak pressure is measured by closing the expiratory valve and administering fresh gas flow of 6 L/min, until the equilibrium pressure is reached (to a maximum of 40 cm of H2O). | At an average of 30 seconds after insertion of laryngeal mask airway | |
Secondary | Oropharyngeal leak pressure | Oropharyngeal leak pressure is measured by closing the expiratory valve and administering fresh gas flow of 6 L/min, until the equilibrium pressure is reached (to a maximum of 40 cm of H2O). | At 5 minute after insertion of laryngeal mask airway | |
Secondary | The time for successful insertion of the device | The total time is measured from the removal of the face mask until bilateral chest rise with the first capnogram upstroke. | During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds | |
Secondary | Success rate in first attempt | Successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway in a first attempt | During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds | |
Secondary | Overall success rate | Successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway in a maximum of three attempts | During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds | |
Secondary | The ease of insertion of device | The ease of placement was assessed using a subjective scale of 1-4 (1= no resistance, 2 = moderate resistance, 3 = high resistance, 4 = inability to place the device) | During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds | |
Secondary | The number of attempts at insertion of device | The number of attempts for successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway | During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds | |
Secondary | The ease of gastric tube placement | The ease of gastric tube placement was graded on a subjective scale (1 = easy, 2 = difficult, 3 = unable to pass) | During induction of anesthesia, an average of 5 minutes | |
Secondary | The time for successful gastric tube placement | The insertion time is measured from first handling of the gastric tube to confirmation of its position in the stomach by aspiration of gastric fluid. | During induction of anesthesia, an average of 5 minutes | |
Secondary | The grade of fiberoptic bronchoscopic view | The fiberoptic bronchoscopic view is defined as Grade 1, larynx only seen; Grade 2, larynx and epiglottis posterior surface seen; Grade 3, larynx, and epiglottis tip or anterior surface seen—visual obstruction of epiglottis to larynx: < 50%; Grade 4, epiglottis down-folded, and its anterior surface seen—visual obstruction of epiglottis to larynx: > 50%; Grade 5, epiglottis downfolded and larynx cannot be seen directly. | During induction of anesthesia, an average of 5 minutes | |
Secondary | Peak inspiratory pressure | Peak inspiratory pressure is recorded from mechanical ventilator. | At 5 minute after insertion of laryngeal mask airway | |
Secondary | The number of airway maneuvers required to maintain airway patency | Airway maneuvers required to maintain airway patency, including jaw thrust, head/neck extension and/or device adjustments such as advancement/withdrawal of device, and alterations to cuff volume. | During the surgery, an average of 2 hours after anesthesia induction | |
Secondary | The type of airway maneuvers required to maintain airway patency | Airway maneuvers required to maintain airway patency, including jaw thrust, head/neck extension and/or device adjustments such as advancement/withdrawal of device, and alterations to cuff volume. | During the surgery, an average of 2 hours after anesthesia induction | |
Secondary | Intraoperative complications | Intraoperative complications including coughing, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, hypoxia (SpO2 < 90%), regurgitation, aspiration, blood staining of the device. | During the surgery, an average of 2 hours after anesthesia induction | |
Secondary | Postoperative complications | Postoperative complications including sore throat, hoarseness/dysphonia, jaw, neck or ear pain, persistent cough, tachypnea, stridor, hypoxia (SpO2 < 90%), nausea and vomiting. | An average of 2 hours after extubation |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05535127 -
Sequential Strategy vs Palpation vs Routine Ultrasound for Detection of Cricothyroid Membrane
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05036460 -
Real-time Sonography in Detecting Inadvertent Esophageal Intubation Among Difficult Intubation Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05303948 -
Evaluation of Two Positions for Free Floating Tracheal Intubation in Weightlessness
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06107751 -
Ramped and Sniffing Position for Cesarean Section Intubation.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04089540 -
New Intubation Method to Achieve Circulatory Stability and to Reduce Number of Intubation Attempts in Neonates
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05522049 -
Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Using Macintosh vs.Hyperangulated Blades in Patients With Expected Difficult Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03046966 -
Manikin To Patient Intubation: Does It Translate?
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05130645 -
Evaluation of Mandibular Mental Angle and Mandibular Profile Angle
|
||
Completed |
NCT06042829 -
Impact of Covid-19 Aerosol Box On Intubation Success Rate
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06138119 -
The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Fiberoptic Intubation Performance
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06115694 -
Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy With Rigid Stylet vs Video Laryngoscopy With the TCI Articulating Introducer for Endotracheal Intubation in Simulated Difficult Airways
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05243758 -
Who is Rapid And Success? The Comparison Of Video Fiberscope And Video Laryngoscope
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04833166 -
Comparing Full vs. Partial Glottis View Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03118596 -
Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05680909 -
Evaluation of SaCo Videolaryngeal Mask Airway in Morbidly Obese
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05429112 -
Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for Intubation With a Videolaryngoscopy in ICU (VIDEOL-FLEXTIP)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05833347 -
Evaluation of Difficult Laryngoscopy With Ultrasonography in Pediatric Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT05366582 -
Neural Integrity Monitor Electromyogram (NIM-EMG) Endotracheal Tube Intubation With Video Laryngoscope
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06322719 -
Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06213389 -
Comparison of EzVision® Videolaryngoscope and Gum Elastic Bougie-Assisted Machintosh Laryngoscopy
|
N/A |