IntuBrite Versus Macintosh for Endotracheal Intubation in Out of Hospital

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

a randomized, parallel, non-blinded trial in a single Emergency Mdeical Service in Poland within a group of 34 ground ambulances crews, comparing time and first pass success (FPS) for endotracheal intubation (ETI) in DL using the IntuBrite® (INT) and Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). intubations will be performed using INT and MCL based on an intention-to-treat analysis. The FPS time of the ETI attempt will be analysed. First attempt success will be counted.

Clinical Trial Description

Investigators designed a prospective observational study to compare INT (IntuBrite®, LLC; Vista, CA, USA) and MCL for ETI performed by paramedics in OHCA without an emergency physician on the scene. The main goal was to determine whether INT is superior to using an MCL laryngoscope during a tracheal intubation attempt in nontraumatic OHCA, in terms of time and effectiveness. The time of intubation was measured using an electronic stopwatch. Time measurement began when the paramedic held the selected laryngoscope and declared their readiness to perform the procedure. The effectiveness of the first ETI attempt for instrumental airway management for nontraumatic adult OHCA and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring was used to confirm correct device placement in all patients. The degree difficulty of intubation attempts for all of the patients included in the study. A long-term survival and a cost-effectiveness analysis were not included within this trial. The investigators will collect case report forms (CRFs) from patients after OHCA within a 40-month period. The average professional experience of the paramedics in instrumental airway management will be noted (DL and LMA). The primary outcome is the FPS time of the ETI attempt performed by the paramedics. The success rate on the first intubation attempt will be counted. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05607836
Study type	Interventional
Source	Medical University of Lodz
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	January 1, 2016
Completion date	June 1, 2022

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05717907` - Suction Catheter as a Guide for Nasotracheal Intubation Under General Anesthesia	N/A
Completed	`NCT03653910` - Effect-site Concentration of Remifentanil for Double-lumen Tubes Intubation: Airtraq VS Macintosh Laryngoscope	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04190524` - Sonographic Assessment of Cricoid Pressure	N/A
Completed	`NCT02359370` - The Effects of Lidocaine and Magnesium Sulphate on the Attenuation of the Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05036460` - Real-time Sonography in Detecting Inadvertent Esophageal Intubation Among Difficult Intubation Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT05502120` - A Comparison of Vie-Scope and Macintosh Blade Laryngoscopes in Morbidly Obese.	N/A
Completed	`NCT03992950` - Effectiveness of Cricoid and Paratracheal Pressures for Occluding Esophagus	N/A
Completed	`NCT05303948` - Evaluation of Two Positions for Free Floating Tracheal Intubation in Weightlessness	N/A
Completed	`NCT03720093` - Exploratory Analysis of Pulmonary Microbiome in Intubated Patients
Recruiting	`NCT03031808` - Comparison of Two Induction Regimens Using Topical Lidocaine or Muscle Relaxant on Sore Throat and Hemodynamics	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT02918526` - Hemodynamic Study With PRAM of the Cardiovascular Response to the Positioning of the Extraglottic Device	N/A
Completed	`NCT02364622` - The Effects of Flexible Intubating Stylet in the Accurate Placement of Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube	N/A
Completed	`NCT05249738` - Tongue Edema Caused by Intubation Tube in Intensive Care Unit Patients
Terminated	`NCT03340207` - Novel Airway Device to Aid Endotracheal Intubations	N/A
Completed	`NCT03842306` - End-tidal Oxygen Can Reliably Predict the Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen Among Emergency Department Patients
Recruiting	`NCT05782517` - I-gel vs. Endotracheal Intubation for Laparoscopic Gynaecological Procedures	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06085326` - Smart Checklist Implementation for Pediatric Tracheal Intubations in the ICU- Multicenter Study	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT06108271` - Innovative Endotracheal Tube Design Reduces Postoperative Laryngeal Injury	N/A
Completed	`NCT05668299` - Determining the Appropriate Setting of an Automated Secretion Removal Technology (TrachFlush)	N/A
Completed	`NCT04079387` - Effect of Endotracheal Tube Plus STYLET Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

IntuBrite Versus Macintosh for Endotracheal Intubation in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms