Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Examining the effectiveness of cricoid pressure using ultrasound imaging. Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents during tracheal intubation, although rare in pediatrics, is a potentially catastrophic complication of anesthesia. Cricoid pressure is applied during rapid sequence induction to occlude the esophagus and prevent aspiration of gastric contents. Accumulating evidence in adults suggests that cricoid pressure often is not effective, either because the esophagus normally lies lateral to the cricoid cartilage, or because downward pressure on the cricoid cartilage laterally displaces (rather than compresses) the esophagus. The investigator proposes to examine the effectiveness of cricoid pressure in children in the peri-operative setting using non-invasive ultrasound imaging. Using this approach, the investigator will investigate the normal anatomical relationship of the esophagus and the cricoid cartilage, as well as how cricoid pressures influences this relationship. Further, the investigator will examine whether alternatives to downward cricoid pressure, such as laterally directed pressure, are more effective at occluding the esophagus.


Clinical Trial Description

D. Design and methods 1. Study design This study is interventional study of intubated or sedated children who are in the operating room or admitted to the MSICU (Medical Surgical Intensive Care Unit). The intervention is the application of cricoid pressure and also left lateral paratracheal pressure. The outer diameter and position of the esophagus will be assessed sonographically before and after the intervention is performed. Patients and families will be recruited in person either in the pre-op clinic or in the MSICU. 2. Patient selection and inclusion/exclusion criteria All patients age 0 - 17 years who are on the OR (operating room) schedule and all patients admitted to the MSICU will be screened for this study. Patients in the MSICU will only be included if they are sedated as part of their clinical management. Exclusion criteria: 1) history of airway or esophageal malformations (e.g. esophageal atresia or trachea-esophageal fistula) or who have had prior surgical procedures involving the airway or esophagus, 2) known difficult airways, 3) patients with tenuous artificial airways as determined by reviewing the CXR (chest x-ray), 4) patients with abnormal blood flow pattern to the head (e.g. history of right carotid ligation or interruption, known incomplete circle of Willis, known right IJ venous clots or obstruction, 5) patients with left neck CVLs (central venous line), and 6) patients with compromised skin integrity on neck. 3. Description of study treatments or exposures/predictors The primary physician/surgeon for each patient will be approached for permission to approach the family for consent. For operative patients, the study intervention will be performed following completion of the procedure when the patient is emerging from anesthesia. This is a period of time that often lasts 10s of minutes, has very good pain control, and is asleep. Scanning will be performed when the patient is intubated, to identify landmarks, and then as soon as the patient has been extubated to assess for the effect of cricoid or paratracheal pressure. For patients in the MSICU, the study intervention will be performed on any sedated patient who fulfills inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study first involves recording a baseline image of the neck anatomy using ultrasound, which is a non-invasive, non-irradiating, non-painful imaging modality. Once the baseline anatomy has been imaged, conventional cricoid pressure will be applied with fingers and/or with the ultrasound probe itself and an image will be recorded. The force applied to the cricoid cartilage will be 30 newtons, as determined by a thin force measurement sensor (Tekscan flexiforce sensor) placed in between the patient's skin and the finger (or ultrasound probe). Next, left lateral paralaryngeal pressure will be applied at the level of the cricoid cartilage with fingers and/or the ultrasound probe itself, and the image will again be recorded. Left lateral paralaryngeal pressure will be 30 newtons, as determined by a thin force measurement sensor placed in between the patient's skin and the finger (or ultrasound probe). 4. Definition of primary and secondary outcomes/endpoints The primary outcome is a change in esophagus outer diameter following the intervention. The diameter will be assessed in the AP(anteroposterior) plane. In addition, the investigator will also record whether the esophageal mucosa is apposed following the application of pressure. Finally, the investigator will record the position of the esophagus relative to the airway before and after the intervention. 5. Data collection methods, assessments, interventions and schedule Data will be collected at the time of ultrasound and uploaded to a secure REDCap database. Patient specific information will be collected, including age, gender, height, weight, primary diagnosis, and size of endotracheal tube. It is possible that additional covariates may be collected post hoc as necessary to complete analysis. 6. Study timeline Data collection will proceed until the sample size is achieved. Interim data analysis will occur when 50% of the proposed sample size has been achieved. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04190524
Study type Interventional
Source Boston Children's Hospital
Contact David Kantor, MD, PhD
Phone 617.355.7327
Email david.kantor@childrens.harvard.edu
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date September 2025
Completion date September 2026

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05717907 - Suction Catheter as a Guide for Nasotracheal Intubation Under General Anesthesia N/A
Completed NCT03653910 - Effect-site Concentration of Remifentanil for Double-lumen Tubes Intubation: Airtraq VS Macintosh Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT02359370 - The Effects of Lidocaine and Magnesium Sulphate on the Attenuation of the Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05036460 - Real-time Sonography in Detecting Inadvertent Esophageal Intubation Among Difficult Intubation Patients N/A
Completed NCT05502120 - A Comparison of Vie-Scope and Macintosh Blade Laryngoscopes in Morbidly Obese. N/A
Completed NCT03992950 - Effectiveness of Cricoid and Paratracheal Pressures for Occluding Esophagus N/A
Completed NCT05303948 - Evaluation of Two Positions for Free Floating Tracheal Intubation in Weightlessness N/A
Completed NCT03720093 - Exploratory Analysis of Pulmonary Microbiome in Intubated Patients
Recruiting NCT03031808 - Comparison of Two Induction Regimens Using Topical Lidocaine or Muscle Relaxant on Sore Throat and Hemodynamics Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT02918526 - Hemodynamic Study With PRAM of the Cardiovascular Response to the Positioning of the Extraglottic Device N/A
Completed NCT02364622 - The Effects of Flexible Intubating Stylet in the Accurate Placement of Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube N/A
Completed NCT05249738 - Tongue Edema Caused by Intubation Tube in Intensive Care Unit Patients
Terminated NCT03340207 - Novel Airway Device to Aid Endotracheal Intubations N/A
Completed NCT03842306 - End-tidal Oxygen Can Reliably Predict the Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen Among Emergency Department Patients
Recruiting NCT05782517 - I-gel vs. Endotracheal Intubation for Laparoscopic Gynaecological Procedures N/A
Recruiting NCT06085326 - Smart Checklist Implementation for Pediatric Tracheal Intubations in the ICU- Multicenter Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06108271 - Innovative Endotracheal Tube Design Reduces Postoperative Laryngeal Injury N/A
Completed NCT05668299 - Determining the Appropriate Setting of an Automated Secretion Removal Technology (TrachFlush) N/A
Completed NCT04079387 - Effect of Endotracheal Tube Plus STYLET Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone N/A
Completed NCT03288311 - Protocolized Post-Extubation Respiratory Support Study N/A