Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

In this randomized crossover trial the investigators test whether three different brands of videolaryngoscopes (VLS) exhibit reduced forces on both upper and lower teeth, and compare them with a classic Macintosh laryngoscope blade.


Clinical Trial Description

During endotracheal intubation the anesthesiologist uses a laryngoscope blade to distract the tongue to achieve the best view of the glottis opening, thereby avoiding using the maxillary incisors as a fulcrum to lever the soft tissues upwards. Using the maxillary incisors as a fulcrum may otherwise result in dental trauma. It is obvious that contact with teeth and - even worse - the incidence of accidental dental trauma, is directly related to the difficulty of the intubation.

Indirect videolaryngoscopy has proven advantageous over direct laryngoscopy using a classic Macintosh blade, for improved viewing of the glottis, with subsequent more successful intubations, and a shorter effective airway time both in patients with normal and difficult airways. Previously, it has been demonstrated that the forces exerted by the anesthesiologist on the patient's maxillary incisors are reduced when using a VLS, compared with a classic Macintosh laryngoscope. However, only one type of VLS (V-MAC®, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was used or only forces applied to upper teeth were being registered. ;


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Prevention


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT01599312
Study type Interventional
Source Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date May 2012
Completion date September 2012

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05717907 - Suction Catheter as a Guide for Nasotracheal Intubation Under General Anesthesia N/A
Completed NCT03653910 - Effect-site Concentration of Remifentanil for Double-lumen Tubes Intubation: Airtraq VS Macintosh Laryngoscope N/A
Recruiting NCT04190524 - Sonographic Assessment of Cricoid Pressure N/A
Completed NCT02359370 - The Effects of Lidocaine and Magnesium Sulphate on the Attenuation of the Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05036460 - Real-time Sonography in Detecting Inadvertent Esophageal Intubation Among Difficult Intubation Patients N/A
Completed NCT05502120 - A Comparison of Vie-Scope and Macintosh Blade Laryngoscopes in Morbidly Obese. N/A
Completed NCT03992950 - Effectiveness of Cricoid and Paratracheal Pressures for Occluding Esophagus N/A
Completed NCT05303948 - Evaluation of Two Positions for Free Floating Tracheal Intubation in Weightlessness N/A
Completed NCT03720093 - Exploratory Analysis of Pulmonary Microbiome in Intubated Patients
Recruiting NCT03031808 - Comparison of Two Induction Regimens Using Topical Lidocaine or Muscle Relaxant on Sore Throat and Hemodynamics Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT02918526 - Hemodynamic Study With PRAM of the Cardiovascular Response to the Positioning of the Extraglottic Device N/A
Completed NCT02364622 - The Effects of Flexible Intubating Stylet in the Accurate Placement of Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube N/A
Completed NCT05249738 - Tongue Edema Caused by Intubation Tube in Intensive Care Unit Patients
Terminated NCT03340207 - Novel Airway Device to Aid Endotracheal Intubations N/A
Completed NCT03842306 - End-tidal Oxygen Can Reliably Predict the Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen Among Emergency Department Patients
Recruiting NCT05782517 - I-gel vs. Endotracheal Intubation for Laparoscopic Gynaecological Procedures N/A
Recruiting NCT06085326 - Smart Checklist Implementation for Pediatric Tracheal Intubations in the ICU- Multicenter Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06108271 - Innovative Endotracheal Tube Design Reduces Postoperative Laryngeal Injury N/A
Completed NCT05668299 - Determining the Appropriate Setting of an Automated Secretion Removal Technology (TrachFlush) N/A
Completed NCT04079387 - Effect of Endotracheal Tube Plus STYLET Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone N/A