Forces on Teeth During Videolaryngoscopy

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

In this randomized crossover trial the investigators test whether three different brands of videolaryngoscopes (VLS) exhibit reduced forces on both upper and lower teeth, and compare them with a classic Macintosh laryngoscope blade.

Clinical Trial Description

During endotracheal intubation the anesthesiologist uses a laryngoscope blade to distract the tongue to achieve the best view of the glottis opening, thereby avoiding using the maxillary incisors as a fulcrum to lever the soft tissues upwards. Using the maxillary incisors as a fulcrum may otherwise result in dental trauma. It is obvious that contact with teeth and - even worse - the incidence of accidental dental trauma, is directly related to the difficulty of the intubation.

Indirect videolaryngoscopy has proven advantageous over direct laryngoscopy using a classic Macintosh blade, for improved viewing of the glottis, with subsequent more successful intubations, and a shorter effective airway time both in patients with normal and difficult airways. Previously, it has been demonstrated that the forces exerted by the anesthesiologist on the patient's maxillary incisors are reduced when using a VLS, compared with a classic Macintosh laryngoscope. However, only one type of VLS (V-MAC®, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was used or only forces applied to upper teeth were being registered. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Prevention

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT01599312
Study type	Interventional
Source	Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	May 2012
Completion date	September 2012

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05717907` - Suction Catheter as a Guide for Nasotracheal Intubation Under General Anesthesia	N/A
Completed	`NCT03653910` - Effect-site Concentration of Remifentanil for Double-lumen Tubes Intubation: Airtraq VS Macintosh Laryngoscope	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04190524` - Sonographic Assessment of Cricoid Pressure	N/A
Completed	`NCT02359370` - The Effects of Lidocaine and Magnesium Sulphate on the Attenuation of the Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05036460` - Real-time Sonography in Detecting Inadvertent Esophageal Intubation Among Difficult Intubation Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT03992950` - Effectiveness of Cricoid and Paratracheal Pressures for Occluding Esophagus	N/A
Completed	`NCT05502120` - A Comparison of Vie-Scope and Macintosh Blade Laryngoscopes in Morbidly Obese.	N/A
Completed	`NCT05303948` - Evaluation of Two Positions for Free Floating Tracheal Intubation in Weightlessness	N/A
Completed	`NCT03720093` - Exploratory Analysis of Pulmonary Microbiome in Intubated Patients
Recruiting	`NCT03031808` - Comparison of Two Induction Regimens Using Topical Lidocaine or Muscle Relaxant on Sore Throat and Hemodynamics	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT02918526` - Hemodynamic Study With PRAM of the Cardiovascular Response to the Positioning of the Extraglottic Device	N/A
Completed	`NCT02364622` - The Effects of Flexible Intubating Stylet in the Accurate Placement of Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube	N/A
Completed	`NCT05249738` - Tongue Edema Caused by Intubation Tube in Intensive Care Unit Patients
Terminated	`NCT03340207` - Novel Airway Device to Aid Endotracheal Intubations	N/A
Completed	`NCT03842306` - End-tidal Oxygen Can Reliably Predict the Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen Among Emergency Department Patients
Recruiting	`NCT05782517` - I-gel vs. Endotracheal Intubation for Laparoscopic Gynaecological Procedures	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06085326` - Smart Checklist Implementation for Pediatric Tracheal Intubations in the ICU- Multicenter Study	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT06108271` - Innovative Endotracheal Tube Design Reduces Postoperative Laryngeal Injury	N/A
Completed	`NCT05668299` - Determining the Appropriate Setting of an Automated Secretion Removal Technology (TrachFlush)	N/A
Completed	`NCT04079387` - Effect of Endotracheal Tube Plus STYLET Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone	N/A