Intraosseous Access Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Study Comparing Infusion Flow Rates Using the Proximal Humerus and Proximal Tibia Intraosseous Vascular Access Insertion Sites and Comparing Intraosseous and Venous Blood for Laboratory Specimen Sampling
Verified date | December 2013 |
Source | Vidacare Corporation |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
- To evaluate infusion flow rates attainable when using the proximal humerus and proximal
tibia IO vascular access sites.
- To evaluate the intraosseous infusion physiology when using the proximal humerus and
proximal tibia IO infusion sites.
- To further evaluate the relationship between IO and venous blood when used for
laboratory testing.
- To determine the time from IO needle insertion to IO access established.
Status | Enrolling by invitation |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | December 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | November 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 21 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Age 21 years or older; Have no amputation of the upper or lower extremities; Able to lay flat on a table for up to 2 hours; Self-reported as healthy; Negative urine pregnancy test day of in-house study procedures (female subjects) Exclusion Criteria: - Have a known active infection in the body; Imprisoned; Pregnant ; Cognitively impaired ; Fracture in humerus or tibia, or significant trauma to the site; Excessive tissue and/or absence of adequate anatomical landmarks at proximal humerus and proximal tibia IO insertion sites; Infection in target area; Humeral/tibial IO insertion in past 48 hours, prosthetic limb or joint or other significant orthopedic procedure in humerus or tibia; Current use of anti-coagulants; Current cardiac condition requiring pacemaker or anti-arrhythmic drugs; Prior adverse reaction to lidocaine; History of impaired renal function; Prior adverse reaction to contrast media; Allergy to iodine containing medications; Allergy to shellfish; Have taken analgesics/anesthetics the day of in-house study procedures; Volunteers with any of the following characteristics may be excluded from the study at the discretion of the PI; Allergy to any food or drug; History of impaired hepatic function; History of cardiac disease; History of pheochromocytoma |
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Bulverde Spring Branch EMS | Spring Branch | Texas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Vidacare Corporation |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Infusion Flow Rates | To evaluate infusion flow rates attainable when using the proximal humerus and proximal tibia IO vascular access. Intraosseous | 1 Day | No |
Secondary | IO blood versus venous blood | To evaluate that IO blood is equal to venous blood when used for laboratory testing when IO blood is the only option in an emergency situation. Intraosseous | 1 Day | No |
Secondary | IO needle insertion to IO access | To determine the time from IO needle insertion to IO access established. Intraosseous | 1 Day | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04135547 -
Venous Injection Compared To intraOsseous Injection During Resuscitation of Patients With Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04918550 -
A Survey on the Cognition and Use of Intraosseous Access Among Medical Staff
|
||
Completed |
NCT02700867 -
Trial Comparing Proximal Tibia and Proximal Humerus Infusion Rates Using the NIO Intraosseous Device
|
N/A |