View clinical trials related to Intraabdominal Infections.
Filter by:This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam (MK-7625A) plus metronidazole versus meropenem in adults diagnosed with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI). The primary hypothesis is ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole is non-inferior to meropenem, as measured by the clinical response rate at the Test-of Cure (TOC) visit in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) population.
This study will analyze gene expression data (HostDx Sepsis test) from blood samples collected from participants with suspected infections. The primary endpoint of the study is to prospectively validate the HostDx Sepsis test for infections. As a secondary endpoint the correlation of participant prognosis and gene expression results in the HostDx Sepsis test will be validated. Participants presenting to the emergency departments of enrolling sites with a suspected infection and 1 vital signs OR suspected sepsis and 2 vital sign changes as stated in the protocol are meeting enrollment criteria
Intraabdominal infection require rapid care management including antibiotic therapy and source control. Morbidity and mortality associated with Intraabdominal infections remain high. French recommendations have been edited in 2000 further updated in 2014. Delay in diagnosis and surgery can lead to worsened outcomes. However, little data are available on early community-acquired intraabdominal infections management to identify risk factors of inadequate management.
This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of sulopenem followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus ertapenem followed by ciprofloxacin-metronidazole for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults.
A Phase 3 comparative study to determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Aztreonam-Avibactam (ATM-AVI) ± Metronidazole (MTZ) versus Meropenem (MER) ± Colistin (COL) for the treatment of serious infections due to Gram negative bacteria.
The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of imipenem+cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL, MK-7655A) in Japanese participants with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) or complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI).
Complicated intra-ABdominal Infections (CABIs) are abdominal infections where there is an abscess inside the abdomen, or a hole (perforation) in an abdominal organ such that infected material e.g. faeces, leaks into the abdominal cavity. A recent review of CABIs after gut surgery found that they can occur in several ways. They can occur in different parts of the abdomen, can be different sizes, and may or may not be caused by a perforated bowel. Management includes, where possible, surgical drainage of an abscess or treatment of the damaged bowel. In addition, all patients are given antibiotic therapy. Despite the varied ways that CABIs occur, we currently tend to treat all CABIs with antibiotics in a similar way. CABIs are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite a significant amount of disease there is little clinical evidence with which to base treatment on. One research study evaluated a short course of antibiotics (4 days) compared with a longer course (up to 10 days) in combination with surgical removal of infection. There was little difference in outcomes, but in both groups about 1 out of every 7 patients had a relapse. A recent review of patients with CABI in Leeds, not in a research study and where surgical removal infection is uncommon and antibiotic durations were short, showed that the risk of relapse was even higher (about 1 in every 3 patients). The antibiotic management of CABIs in the UK is variable and involves giving between 4 days to 28 days of antibiotics. In summary, there is an unacceptably high relapse rate in patients treated for CABI, and uncertainty about the best length of antibiotic therapy that should be used to prevent these relapses. We therefore propose to investigate if long course antibiotic therapy (28 days) is more effective than short course antibiotics (≤10 days) in preventing relapses of CABI.
This study aims to evaluate the safety and tolerability of MK-7625A (ceftolozane/tazobactam) plus metronidazole, compared with that of meropenem in pediatric participants with cIAI.
This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of eravacycline compared with meropenem in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs).
This is a Phase 3, multi-site, non-randomized, open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of MK-7625A 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g/tazobactam 0.5 g) plus metronidazole 500 mg for the treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections (cIAI) in Japanese participants. Efficacy will be primarily assessed by clinical response defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection.