Clinical Trials Logo

Intestinal Obstruction clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Intestinal Obstruction.

Filter by:
  • Active, not recruiting  
  • « Prev · Page 2

NCT ID: NCT02318888 Active, not recruiting - Surgical Adhesions Clinical Trials

Does Icodextrin Reduce the Risk of Small Bowel Obstruction?

Start date: December 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study aims at investigating if icodextrin 4% instilled in abdominal cavity during surgery can reduce the risk of surgery and hospitalisation for small bowel obstruction in patients with colorectal cancer. Follow-up data is collected from the Swedish national colorectal cancer registry.Patients are followed for 5 years postoperatively.The study is a randomized Swedish multicenter study and planned to include 1,800 patients. A safety control is planned after 300 included patients.

NCT ID: NCT02198898 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction

Anti-adhesion Effect of GUARDIX-SGⓇ in Gastric Cancer Surgery

Start date: July 2013
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study is to evaluate the efficacy of GUARDIX-SGⓇ for patients with gastrectomy in Korea and the investigators hypothesized applying of adhesive preventing agent would reduce incidence of adhesive obstruction after gastrectomy.

NCT ID: NCT01867528 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction

Comparison of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery in the Treatment of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction

Start date: July 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Small bowel obstruction is a common reason for surgical admission. Most common reason for small bowel obstruction is adhesions, which account up to 70-80 % of small bowel obstructions. Large proportion of adhesive small bowel obstructions may be treated nonoperatively, but up to 50-60% may need surgical intervention. Current golden standard for surgical intervention is open adhesiolysis. Recently, retrospective studies have provided encouraging results of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstructions. However, no prospective randomized trials have been carried out and retrospective series carries a high risk for patient selection and bias. Although in general laparoscopy has been associated with shortened hospital stay, less pain and reduced mortality, laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction has been reported to cause iatrogenic small bowel lesions up to 7% of patients. Aim of the study is to compare open adhesiolysis to laparoscopic adhesiolysis. The investigators hypothesis is that laparoscopic adhesiolysis is safe, will shorten the hospital stay, and reduce mortality compared to open approach.