View clinical trials related to Intervertebral Disc Displacement.
Filter by:The proposed investigation is a multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the BAGUERA®C to the control, a similar, legally marketed total disc replacement device in subjects with symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD). Subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to the one-level BAGUERA®C Cervical Disc Prosthesis (investigational group) or to the one-level Mobi-C® Cervical Disc (control group). Subjects enrolled in the study will be evaluated pre-operatively, at the time of surgery, discharge, and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months and then annually until 7 years post-surgery.
This study will be conducted at Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics (NRITO) n.a. Ya.L.Tsivyan, Novosibirsk, Russia. The current study is prospective observational study to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative estimation of disc herniation recurrence among patients with lumbar disc herniation using predictive mathematical model at terms 3 years postoperatively . It is expected to enroll 350 patients aged 18-70 with lumbar disc herniation. Risk estimation of disc herniation recurrence will be evaluated preoperatively, then patient will undergo conventional microdiscectomy. Postoperative eximanation will include Visits every 6-months during 3 years to evaluate clinical outcomes.
The purpose of this prospective, single-arm, multicenter study is to assess an annular closure device when used as an adjunct to a primary lumbar limited discectomy, to limited discectomy alone.
A prospective observational study investigating the effectiveness and safety of integrative Korean medicine treatment in cervical disc herniation patients with neck pain or cervical radiculopathy at 4 locations of Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine as assessed through of pain, functional disability, work loss and quality of life patient-reported outcomes
Even though surgery due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH) shows a more rapid relief of pain and recovery, the evidence of surgery being superior to conservative treatment in the long term is inconclusive. Involving patients in the decisions whether or not to have surgery is therefore essential. A small survey performed at our Spine Center however, showed that patients were often not fully involved in this treatment decision. Not being involved might lead patients to decision regret and unnecessary conflicts in the decision-making process. The purpose of this project is therefore to assess the effect of a newly developed patient decision aid (PtDA) to facilitate shared decision making (SDM), when patients choose between surgical or non-surgical treatment for LDH, on SDM, decisional conflict, decision regret and treatment outcomes in a randomized controlled trial. The project is performed at Center of Spine Surgery & Research, Middelfart. Inclusion and one month follow up is already completed and one year follow-up data currently being collected.
This study is a prospective, multi-center study to monitor the early safety and performance of one iteration of the Barricaid Anular Closure Device (ACD) - 6mm anchor width, when used as an adjunct to limited discectomy.
The main objective of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of ozone therapy in patients on the waiting list for surgery due to disc herniation.
Post-Marketing Clinical Follow-up of an Anular Closure System (Barricaid®) to Confirm Comparability of Outcome between Devices with Subcomponents from Two Different Suppliers
The objective of this prospective controlled crossover study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pentoxifylline per os (800 mg daily) in the management of lumbar radiculopathy
Background: Patients suffering residual disability after anterior decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery for cervical disc disease may be prescribed physical activity (PPA) or neck-specific exercises (NSE). Currently, we lack data for the success of either approach. There is also a knowledge-gap concerning the use of internet-based care for chronic neck pain, inclusive of cervical disc disease. The scarcity of these data, and the high proportion of patients with various degrees of incapacity following ACDF, warrants increased efforts to investigate and improve cost-effective rehabilitation. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of a structured, internet-based NSE program, versus PPA following ACDF surgery. Methods: This is a prospective, randomised, experimental, longitudinal multicentre study, that includes 140 patients with residual disability (≥30% on the Neck Disability Index; NDI) following ACDF for radiculopathy due to cervical disc disease. Patient recruitment occurs following attendance at routine clinical appointments, scheduled for 3-months post-surgery. Patients are then randomised to one of two groups (70 patients/group), scheduled for a 3-month treatment of either internet-based NSE or PPA. Questionnaires on background data, pain and discomfort, physical and mental capacity, satisfaction with care, and health and workplace factors are completed, with physical measurements of neck-related function performed by independent test leaders blinded to randomisation. Measurements are performed at inclusion, after the 3-month treatments (end of treatment), and at a 2-year follow-up. Radiography will be completed at the 2-year follow-up. Preoperative data will be collected from the Swedish Spine Registry (Swespine). Data on healthcare consumption, drug use, and sick leave will be requested from the relevant national registers.