View clinical trials related to Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.
Filter by:Low back pain is a major public health issue as the leading cause of disability globally. Degeneration of intervertebral disc (IVD) disorder is once source of low back pain. Current treatment options for low back pain secondary to degeneration of intervertebral disc include conservative care, steroid injections, prescription pain medications, physical therapy, or surgery, such as discectomy or laminectomy. Treatments focus on addressing manifested symptoms rather than functional causes, and symptomatic treatment of discogenic low back pain is less than ideal. The investigators have recently found that parathyroid hormone (PTH) effectively attenuates disc degeneration in aged mice. This clinical trial will test if 3-months of daily PTH-related protein (PTHrP), abaloparatide will improve pain, function, and disc health in people with low back pain secondary to lumbar disc degeneration.
This study seeks to bridge these technologies and obtain data regarding the safety and efficacy of image guided percutaneous needle injection of expanded autologous bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells to symptomatic degenerated intervertebral discs in humans. The primary outcome will be to assess the safety and efficacy and monitor for adverse events.
Total lumbar disc replacement has previously been compared to posterior fusion of the lumbar spine, showing some favor towards total disc replacement. The study aims to compare total disc replacement to anterior fusion, sparing the muscles of the back and thus comparing the two different methods using the same surgical approach.
This study is being conducted to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of three different interbody implant types when used with cancellous allograft chips with BMA or cellular allograft in patients undergoing XLIF surgery. The study will evaluate success by comparing the rate of fusion, complications profile, and any relationships between clinical outcomes (pain and function) and radiographic outcomes (fusion rate) between the three implant groups.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to assess and compare radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients who are to undergo combined interbody/posterolateral lumbar fusion procedures, supplemented with pedicle screw instrumentation, using one of the following interbody cages; the Nexxt Spine Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage or the HonourTM poly-ether-ether-ketone cage.
Patient outcomes and satisfaction are an ever-increasing priority in surgical specialties. Cryotherapy has been utilized following spine surgery as an adjunct therapy to reduce postoperative inflammation and improve patient outcomes. However, limited studies have investigated the effect of cryotherapy on postoperative pain and narcotics use. Fountas et al. performed a randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of postoperative cryotherapy following single-level lumbar microdiscectomy. The authors reported patients receiving cryotherapy required significantly less pain medication (0.058 mg/kg/hr versus 0.067 mg/kg/hr, p<0.001) and had shorter hospital stays (1.71 days versus 2.65 days, p<0.001) as compared to the control group. In another randomized trial of single-level lumbar discectomy patients, Murata et al. demonstrated cryotherapy to have no significant effect on VAS inpatient pain scores or postoperative blood loss.
The purpose of this study is to collect information about how patients feel when doctors manage their pain after lumbar spine surgery using a combination of EXPAREL® and bupivacaine injected into the lumbar spine at the end of surgery, compared to the patients that doctors use only EXPAREL® or bupivacaine to manage their pain. This information will help doctors determine which approach works best for patients who will receive surgery in their lumbar spine in the future.
This is a randomized prospective study that will compare the use of narcotics in a control group of non-injected patients with a treatment arm of patients injected intra-operatively with a ropivacaine, morphine, and epinephrine cocktail. The investigators hypothesize that this treatment will reduce narcotic use in patients during their hospital stay, and possibly decrease the length of their stay in the hospital.The investigators also hope their pain will be decreased as displayed by their multi-daily Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment (CAPA) score.
Study Design: Prospective, single-blinded, multi-center, randomized, controlled, pivotal study Study Objective: To evaluate if P-15L is not inferior in effectiveness and safety to local autologous bone (and allograft as extender where necessary) when applied in instrumented TLIF in subjects with Degenerative disc disease (DDD) Study Endpoints: Primary endpoint: Month 24 Composite Clinical Success (CCS): - Achievement of fusion (Evidence of continuous trabecular bridging bone in the intervertebral space) - At least 15-point improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - No new or worsening, persistent neurological deficit - No subsequent surgical intervention at the index level Once fusion is radiographically confirmed, it will be assumed that fusion has occurred at all subsequent time points without the need to reconfirm fusion status at later time points. Multiplicity Controlled Secondary endpoint: • Visit at which fusion is confirmed. Other Secondary endpoints: - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, changes over time, and achievement of a 20 mm improvement (Back, left leg, right leg); - Physical Function and Mental Health Composite Scores (Short Form Health Survey SF-12 and changes over time).
The main objectives of this study are to evaluate the benefits of back bracing in the symptomatic management of patients with CLBP due to degenerative lumbar disc disease. The plan is to study patients with uncomplicated CLBP without symptoms of radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate if a back brace provides any additive benefit to usual care consisting of exercise and patient education in patients with CLBP due to degenerative disc disease. Specific Aim 1. To evaluate the effectiveness of back brace to improve pain and patient-reported functional measures in patients with uncomplicated CLBP due to degenerative disc and degenerative joint disease without associated symptoms of neurogenic claudication or lumbosacral radiculopathy. Hypothesis 1. Back brace in addition to usual care will provide statistically significant improvement in pain and functional measures compared to usual care alone. Specific Aim 2. To evaluate the adherence to back brace wear instructions in patients with uncomplicated CLBP due to degenerative disc and degenerative joint disease without associated symptoms of neurogenic claudication or lumbosacral radiculopathy Hypothesis 2. Patients with CLBP, due to degenerative disc and degenerative joint disease without associated symptoms of neurogenic claudication or lumbosacral radiculopathy, who are prescribed a back brace, will demonstrate clinically acceptable rates of adherence to brace wear instructions.