Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02807350
Other study ID # IXT5
Secondary ID 2U10EY011751
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 16, 2017
Est. completion date February 15, 2022

Study information

Verified date May 2022
Source Jaeb Center for Health Research
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The main objectives of this randomized trial comparing overminus lens treatment to non-overminus (spectacles without overminus or spectacles with plano lenses) are to determine: - The long-term on-treatment effect of overminus treatment on distance intermittent exotropia (IXT) control score. - The off-treatment effect of overminus treatment on distance IXT control score (following weaning and 3 months off treatment).


Description:

The main objectives of this randomized trial comparing overminus lens treatment to non-overminus (spectacles without overminus or spectacles with plano lenses) are to determine: - The long-term on-treatment effect of overminus treatment on distance IXT control score. - The off-treatment effect of overminus treatment on distance IXT control score (following weaning and 3 months off treatment). The recently completed IXT3 pilot study (NCT02223650) addressed the question of whether overminus lens therapy has an initial short-term therapeutic effect for IXT while wearing overminus spectacles. There have been no rigorous studies that address the following important questions related to overminus lens therapy: - Does overminus lens therapy have a long-term therapeutic effect for IXT while wearing overminus spectacles (over many months or years)? - Does overminus lens therapy have a long-term therapeutic effect for IXT when overminus spectacles are discontinued? In November 2019, a protocol amendment discontinued overminus lens treatment and extended the study for an additional 18 months after the 18-month randomized trial has ended. The objective of the extension study is to compare long-term refractive error between subjects originally treated with either overminus spectacles or non-overminus spectacles as part of the 18-month randomized trial; treatment is at investigator discretion.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 386
Est. completion date February 15, 2022
Est. primary completion date November 30, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 3 Years to 10 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age 3 years to < 11 years - Intermittent exotropia (manifest deviation) meeting all of the following criteria: - At distance: intermittent exotropia or constant exotropia o Mean distance control score of 2 points or more (mean of 3 assessments over the exam) - At near: intermittent exotropia, exophoria, or orthophoria o Subject cannot have a score of 5 points on all 3 near assessments of control - Exodeviation at least 15? at distance measured by PACT - Near deviation does not exceed distance deviation by more than 10? by PACT (convergence insufficiency type IXT excluded) - Distance visual acuity (any optotype method) in each eye of 0.4 logMAR (20/50) or better if age 3 years and 0.3 logMAR (20/40) or better if 4 years or older. - Interocular difference of distance visual acuity =0.2 logMAR (2 lines on a logMAR chart) - Refractive error between -6.00 diopters (D) standard error (SE) and +1.00D SE (inclusive) in the most myopic / least hyperopic eye based on a cycloplegic refraction performed within the past 2 months or at the end of the enrollment exam. - If refractive error (based on cycloplegic refraction performed within past 2 months or at the end of the enrollment exam) meets any of the following criteria, then pre-study spectacles are required and must have been worn for at least 1 week prior to enrollment: - SE anisometropia =1.00D - Astigmatism =1.50D in either eye - SE myopia =-1.00D in either eye Pre-study refractive correction, if worn, must meet the following criteria relative to the cycloplegic refraction performed within past 2 months or at the end of the enrollment exam: - SE anisometropia must be corrected within <1.00D of the SE anisometropic difference - Astigmatism must be corrected within <1.00D of full magnitude; axis must be within 10 degrees. - The SE of the spectacles must not meet the definition of substantial overminus (see exclusion criteria below) - Gestational age = 32 weeks - Birth weight > 1500 grams - Parent understands the protocol and is willing to accept randomization to overminus spectacles or non-overminus spectacles - Parent has home phone (or access to phone) and is willing to be contacted by Jaeb Center staff and Investigator's site staff - Relocation outside of area of an active PEDIG site within next 18 months is not anticipated Exclusion Criteria: - Treatment for IXT or amblyopia (other than refractive correction) within the past 4 weeks, including vision therapy, patching, atropine, or other penalization. - Current contact lens wear - Substantial deliberate overminus treatment within the past 6 months, defined as spectacles overminused by more than 1.00D SE than the cycloplegic refractive error (within 2 months or at the end of the enrollment exam) - Prior strabismus, intraocular, or refractive surgery (including BOTOX injection) - Abnormality of the cornea, lens, or central retina - Down syndrome or cerebral palsy - Severe developmental delay which would interfere with treatment or evaluation (in the opinion of the investigator). Subjects with mild speech delays or reading and/or learning disabilities are not excluded. - Any disease known to affect accommodation, vergence, and ocular motility such as multiple sclerosis, Graves orbitopathy, dysautonomia, myasthenia gravis, or current use of atropine for amblyopia - Anti-seizure medications [e.g., carbamazepine (Tegretol, Carbatrol, Epitol, or Equetro), diazepam (Valium or Diastat), clobazam (Frisium or Onfri), clonazepam (Klonopin), lorazepam (Ativan), ethosuximide (Zarontin), felbamate (Felbatol), lacosamide (VIMPAT), gabapentin (Neurontin), oxcarbazepine (Oxtellar XR or Trileptal), phenobarbital, phenytoin (Dilantin or Phenytek), pregabalin (Lyrica), tiagabine (Gabitril), topiramate (Topamax), valproate (Depakote), or zonisamide (Zonegran), vigabatrin (Sabril)]

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Overminus treatment
spectacles with full cycloplegic refraction plus 2.50 D overminus added to the sphere
Non-overminus treatment
spectacles with full cycloplegic refraction without overminus

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Alberta Children's Hospital Calgary Alberta
Canada CHU - Sainte-Justine Montreal Quebec
United States Akron Children's Hospital Akron Ohio
United States University Eye Center at Ketchum Health Anaheim California
United States The Emory Eye Center Atlanta Georgia
United States Greater Baltimore Medical Center Baltimore Maryland
United States Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore Maryland
United States University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama
United States Indiana University School Of Optometry Bloomington Indiana
United States St Luke's Hospital Boise Idaho
United States Boston Medical Center Boston Massachusetts
United States Tufts Medical Center Boston Massachusetts
United States Medical University of South Carolina, Storm Eye Institute Charleston South Carolina
United States Pediatric Eye Specialists Chattanooga Tennessee
United States Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Chicago Illinois
United States Illinois College of Optometry Chicago Illinois
United States The Eye Specialists Center, LLC Chicago Ridge Illinois
United States Cincinnati Children's Hospital Cincinnati Ohio
United States The Ohio State University College of Optometry Columbus Ohio
United States Concord Ophthalmologic Associates Concord New Hampshire
United States Midwestern U Chicago College of Optometry Downers Grove Illinois
United States Duke University Eye Center Durham North Carolina
United States Nova Southeastern University College of Optometry, The Eye Institute Fort Lauderdale Florida
United States Marshall B. Ketchum University Fullerton California
United States University of Florida Shands Hospital Gainesville Florida
United States Midwestern University Eye Institute Glendale Arizona
United States Helen DeVos Children's Hospital Pediatric Ophthalmology Grand Rapids Michigan
United States Pediatric Ophthalmology, P.C. Grand Rapids Michigan
United States Texas Children's Hospital - Dept. Of Ophthalmology Houston Texas
United States University of Houston College of Optometry Houston Texas
United States Riley Hospital for Children Indianapolis Indiana
United States Nemours Children's Clinic Jacksonville Florida
United States Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics Kansas City Missouri
United States Gundersen Health System La Crosse Wisconsin
United States Conestoga Eye Lancaster Pennsylvania
United States University of Kentucky Department of Neurology Lexington Kentucky
United States Arkansas Childrens Little Rock Arkansas
United States Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology Loma Linda California
United States Texas Tech University Health Science Center Lubbock Texas
United States Southern College of Optometry Memphis Tennessee
United States University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota
United States Saddleback Eye Medical Associates Mission Viejo California
United States The Eye Specialist Center, LLC Munster Indiana
United States State University of New York, College of Optometry New York New York
United States Virginia Pediatric Eye Center Norfolk Virginia
United States Dean A. McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Oklahoma City Oklahoma
United States University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Nebraska
United States Stanford University Palo Alto California
United States Salus University/Pennsylvania College of Optometry Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States UPMC Children's Eye Center of Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States Eye Care Associates, Inc. Poland Ohio
United States Western University College of Optometry Pomona California
United States Casey Eye Institute Portland Oregon
United States Pacific University College of Optometry Portland Oregon
United States Mayo Clinic Department of Ophthalmology Rochester Minnesota
United States U of MO St. Louis College of Optometry Saint Louis Missouri
United States University of California San Francisco Department of Ophthalmology San Francisco California
United States Houston Eye Associates The Woodlands Texas
United States Children's Eye Care PC West Bloomfield Michigan
United States Wolfe Eye Clinic West Des Moines Iowa
United States Pediatric Eye Associates Wilmette Illinois

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Jaeb Center for Health Research National Eye Institute (NEI), Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada, 

References & Publications (1)

Chen AM, Erzurum SA, Chandler DL, Hercinovic A, Melia BM, Bhatt AR, Suh DW, Vricella M, Erickson JW, Miller AM, Marsh JD, Bodack MI, Martinson SR, Titelbaum JR, Gray ME, Holtorf HL, Kong L, Kraker RT, Rahmani B, Shah BK, Holmes JM, Cotter SA; Pediatric Ey — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Mean Distance Control at 12-Months (On-Treatment Visit) A comparison of mean control of the distance exodeviation (average of 3 measurements over the exam) between the 2.50 diopters (D) overminus group and the non-overminus group (spectacles without overminus or no spectacles) at 12 months. The Office Control Score provides a rating of exodeviation control on a 0 to 5 scale, in subjects with intermittent exotropia. Scores 3 to 5 reflect the proportion of time a spontaneous manifest exotropia is present during 30 seconds of observation (<50% score 3; >50% score 4; 100% score 5). If no spontaneous manifest exotropia is observed, scores 0 to 2 reflect the longest time to regain fusion after three, 10-second dissociations (>5 seconds score 2; 1-5 seconds score 1; <1 second score 0). 12 months
Primary Mean Distance Control at 18-Months (Off-Treatment Visit) A comparison of mean control of the distance exodeviation (average of 3 measurements over the exam) between the 2.50D overminus group and the non-overminus group (spectacles without overminus or no spectacles) at 18 months (after treatment discontinuation). The Office Control Score provides a rating of exodeviation control on a 0 to 5 scale, in subjects with intermittent exotropia. Scores 3 to 5 reflect the proportion of time a spontaneous manifest exotropia is present during 30 seconds of observation (<50% score 3; >50% score 4; 100% score 5). If no spontaneous manifest exotropia is observed, scores 0 to 2 reflect the longest time to regain fusion after three, 10-second dissociations (>5 seconds score 2; 1-5 seconds score 1; <1 second score 0). 18 months
Secondary Number of Participants With No Spontaneous Tropia The number of subjects with no spontaneous tropia at 12 months and at 18 months will be compared between treatment groups. 12 months
Secondary No Spontaneous Tropia The proportion of subjects with no spontaneous tropia at 12 months and at 18 months will be compared between treatment groups. At 18 months
Secondary Change in Distance Control The proportion of subjects with =1 point improvement in distance control between baseline and 12 months will be compared between treatment groups. The proportion of subjects with =2 points improvement in distance control will be similarly compared between treatment groups. The Office Control Score provides a rating of exodeviation control on a 0 to 5 scale, in subjects with intermittent exotropia. Scores 3 to 5 reflect the proportion of time a spontaneous manifest exotropia is present during 30 seconds of observation (<50% score 3; >50% score 4; 100% score 5). If no spontaneous manifest exotropia is observed, scores 0 to 2 reflect the longest time to regain fusion after three, 10-second dissociations (>5 seconds score 2; 1-5 seconds score 1; <1 second score 0). 12 months
Secondary Change in Distance Control The proportion of subjects with =1 point improvement in distance control between baseline and 18 months will be compared between treatment groups. The proportion of subjects with =2 points improvement in distance control will be similarly compared between treatment groups. The Office Control Score provides a rating of exodeviation control on a 0 to 5 scale, in subjects with intermittent exotropia. Scores 3 to 5 reflect the proportion of time a spontaneous manifest exotropia is present during 30 seconds of observation (<50% score 3; >50% score 4; 100% score 5). If no spontaneous manifest exotropia is observed, scores 0 to 2 reflect the longest time to regain fusion after three, 10-second dissociations (>5 seconds score 2; 1-5 seconds score 1; <1 second score 0). 18 months
Secondary Deterioration as Assessed by Motor Alignment and Stereoacuity at Near (12 Months) The cumulative proportion of subjects who meet deterioration criteria by the time point will be estimated for each treatment group.
Participants who meet either of the following at any visit by a specific timepoint (e.g., 12 months, 18 months) will be considered to have met deterioration criteria by that timepoint.
Motor deterioration: Control of the exodeviation measures 5 (constant exotropia) on all three assessments at distance and near. The exodeviation does not need to be constant throughout the entire exam provided that it is constant during all three assessments of control.
Stereoacuity deterioration: Drop in near stereoacuity of at least 2 octaves from enrollment stereoacuity, or to nil, confirmed by a retest by a Masked Examiner on a subsequent day.
Note: participants with nil stereoacuity at enrollment will not be able to deteriorate with respect to a drop in near stereoacuity.
12 months
Secondary Deterioration as Assessed by Motor Alignment and Stereoacuity at Near (18 Months) The cumulative proportion of subjects who meet deterioration criteria by the time point will be estimated for each treatment group.
Participants who meet either of the following at any visit by a specific timepoint (e.g., 12 months, 18 months) will be considered to have met deterioration criteria by that timepoint.
Motor deterioration: Control of the exodeviation measures 5 (constant exotropia) on all three assessments at distance and near. The exodeviation does not need to be constant throughout the entire exam provided that it is constant during all three assessments of control.
Stereoacuity deterioration: Drop in near stereoacuity of at least 2 octaves from enrollment stereoacuity, or to nil, confirmed by a retest by a Masked Examiner on a subsequent day.
Note: participants with nil stereoacuity at enrollment will not be able to deteriorate with respect to a drop in near stereoacuity.
18 months
Secondary Near Control (12 Months) Mean control of the near exodeviation (average of 3 measurements over the exam). The Office Control Score provides a rating of exodeviation control on a 0 to 5 scale, in subjects with intermittent exotropia. Scores 3 to 5 reflect the proportion of time a spontaneous manifest exotropia is present during 30 seconds of observation (<50% score 3; >50% score 4; 100% score 5). If no spontaneous manifest exotropia is observed, scores 0 to 2 reflect the longest time to regain fusion after three, 10-second dissociations (>5 seconds score 2; 1-5 seconds score 1; <1 second score 0). 12 months
Secondary Near Control (18 Months) Mean control of the near exodeviation (average of 3 measurements over the exam). The Office Control Score provides a rating of exodeviation control on a 0 to 5 scale, in subjects with intermittent exotropia. Scores 3 to 5 reflect the proportion of time a spontaneous manifest exotropia is present during 30 seconds of observation (<50% score 3; >50% score 4; 100% score 5). If no spontaneous manifest exotropia is observed, scores 0 to 2 reflect the longest time to regain fusion after three, 10-second dissociations (>5 seconds score 2; 1-5 seconds score 1; <1 second score 0). 18 months
Secondary Change in Near Control (12 Months) For each timepoint, the change in near control since baseline will be reported. The Office Control Score provides a rating of exodeviation control on a 0 to 5 scale, in subjects with intermittent exotropia. Scores 3 to 5 reflect the proportion of time a spontaneous manifest exotropia is present during 30 seconds of observation (<50% score 3; >50% score 4; 100% score 5). If no spontaneous manifest exotropia is observed, scores 0 to 2 reflect the longest time to regain fusion after three, 10-second dissociations (>5 seconds score 2; 1-5 seconds score 1; <1 second score 0). 12 months
Secondary Change in Near Control (18 Months) For each timepoint, the change in near control since baseline will be reported. The Office Control Score provides a rating of exodeviation control on a 0 to 5 scale, in subjects with intermittent exotropia. Scores 3 to 5 reflect the proportion of time a spontaneous manifest exotropia is present during 30 seconds of observation (<50% score 3; >50% score 4; 100% score 5). If no spontaneous manifest exotropia is observed, scores 0 to 2 reflect the longest time to regain fusion after three, 10-second dissociations (>5 seconds score 2; 1-5 seconds score 1; <1 second score 0). 18 months
Secondary Angle Magnitude (12 Months) The magnitude of the deviation by Prism Alternate Cover Test (PACT) will be compared between treatment groups. 12 months
Secondary Angle Magnitude (18 Months) The magnitude of the deviation by Prism Alternate Cover Test (PACT) will be compared between treatment groups. 18 months
Secondary Stereoacuity at 12 Months A comparison of near stereoacuity will be assessed using the Randot Preschool stereotest at near (performed at 40 cm) between treatment groups. 12 months
Secondary Stereoacuity at 18 Months A comparison of near stereoacuity will be assessed using the Randot Preschool stereotest at near (performed at 40 cm) between treatment groups. 18 months
Secondary Compliance With Spectacle Wear (12 Months) Compliance with spectacle wear will be assessed at the 12-month and 18-month outcome exam. Parents will give an estimate of the proportion of the time their children wore their spectacles. Proportion of time worn will be described as excellent (76% to 100%), good (51% to 75%), fair (26% to 50%), or poor (= 25%). The distribution of compliance will be assessed for each treatment group at the outcome exam. 12 months
Secondary Compliance With Spectacle Wear (18 Months) Compliance with spectacle wear will be assessed at the 12-month and 18-month outcome exam. Parents will give an estimate of the proportion of the time their children wore their spectacles. Proportion of time worn will be described as excellent (76% to 100%), good (51% to 75%), fair (26% to 50%), or poor (= 25%). The distribution of compliance will be assessed for each treatment group at the outcome exam. 18 months
Secondary Parent Symptom Survey [12 Months] A brief survey of symptoms that may be associated with overminus such as headaches, eye strain, and problems with spectacle wear will be administered to the parents of the subjects. Parents are asked to respond to the survey questions based on their observations of their child in the past 2 weeks. Response options are based on frequency of observations; never, rarely, sometimes, often, always, and not applicable. At 12 months
Secondary Parent Symptom Survey [18 Months] A brief survey of symptoms that may be associated with overminus such as headaches, eye strain, and problems with spectacle wear will be administered to the parents of the subjects. Parents are asked to respond to the survey questions based on their observations of their child in the past 2 weeks. Response options are based on frequency of observations; never, rarely, sometimes, often, always, and not applicable. At 18 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT01267500 - Study of Non-surgical Treatment Versus Observation in Asian Children With Intermittent Exotropia N/A
Recruiting NCT04487249 - Trial of Vision Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia N/A
Recruiting NCT05462821 - Full-Time Occlusion Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia in Children N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03700632 - Part-time Patch Therapy for Treatment of Intermittent Exotropia N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03321838 - Office Based Vergence and Accommodative Therapy and Intermittent Exotropia N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02450162 - Lateral Rectus Muscle and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) in Two Recession Surgeries N/A
Recruiting NCT04199871 - Improving Control of Alignment in Intermittent Exotropia N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04744779 - Office Based Vergence/Accommodative Therapy for the Treatment of Intermittent Exotropia N/A
Completed NCT02131792 - Early Results of Slanted Recession of the Lateral Rectus Muscle for Intermittent Exotropia With Convergence Weakness N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03952702 - Overminus Lens Therapy in Intermittent
Completed NCT02383381 - Lateral Rectus Muscle and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) N/A
Terminated NCT02466659 - Controlled Intermittent Alternate Occlusion (CIAO) Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04263103 - A Training Software (SJ-RS-WL2015) Rehabilitating Intermittent Exotropia Binocular Functions N/A
Recruiting NCT06117813 - Visual Perceptual Learning Based Digital Therapeutics for Stereopsis in Intermittent Exotropia N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT03641040 - The Analysis of Ocular Deviations Between Dominant and Non-dominant Eye Using Video-oculography (VOG) in Intermittent Exotropia N/A
Completed NCT02223650 - A Pilot Clinical Trial of Overminus Spectacle Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT02902887 - Monitored Controlled Intermittent Alternate Occlusion (CIAO) Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia N/A
Completed NCT03661476 - The Effect of Oculo-Motor Exercises in Intermittent Exotropia N/A
Recruiting NCT05234957 - Symmetric vs Asymmetric BLR Recession in Management of Basic IXT With Ocular Dominance N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04307160 - Relationship of Age at Surgery to Surgical Outcome After Surgery for Intermittent Exotropia

External Links