Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02540525
Other study ID # URO-2009
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received February 22, 2014
Last updated September 1, 2015
Start date January 2013
Est. completion date July 2014

Study information

Verified date September 2015
Source Faculdade de Medicina do ABC
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Brazil: National Health Surveillance Agency
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

1. OBJECTIVE:

To determine the efficacy and safety of a single-incision mini-sling compared with a transobturator midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment.

2. METHODS:

This prospective single-center randomized controlled trial will involve 100 women with a diagnosis of SUI. Primary outcomes were the objective and subjective cure rates, defined as negative cough stress and pad tests, and satisfaction rates. Quality of life assessed by the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory Short Form, operation time, complications, and reoperation rates were also recorded. The efficacy was analyzed using a noninferiority test with a margin of 15%. For the noninferiority test, a P value >.05 rejects the noninferiority hypothesis of the mini-sling.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date July 2014
Est. primary completion date January 2014
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients aged over 18 years

- Clinical and urodynamic diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence

- Absence of associated neurological diseases

- No clinically significant detrusor instability (ie, to determine which symptoms are proportionally more significant for patient incontinence efforts)

Exclusion Criteria:

- urodynamic changes suggesting a reduction in bladder capacity, bladder compliance or suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction

- Coagulopathies

- Pregnancy

- History of sensitivity to foreign body

- Acute Urinary Tract Infection

- Sequelae of high exposure to ionizing radiation

- Use of drugs that can result in high and / or risk of significant postoperative complications surgical risk, including any drug that interferes with blood clotting

- anesthetic contraindication to the procedure

- Vulvovaginitis: presence of vaginal discharge with laboratory proven infection

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Intervention

Device:
Ophira
The procedure will be perfomed with a single incision in anterior wall vagina
Transobturator sling
Safyre T Plus ® system uses two helical needles for securing an average urethral sling mesh polypropylene soft tissue below the pubic bone by means of spinal anesthesia. Short form of the sling implantation is carried out as follows: a small longitudinal incision in the anterior vaginal wall approximately 2 cm is performed at 1 cm from the urethral meatus. Takes place below minimum dissection toward the lower branch of the ischium, and with the aid of the needle obturator and perforated membrane (outside-in maneuver). After that, the sling is attached to the needle carrying the same path. Subsequently, the passage of the needle is held in contraleral side. The procedure finishes performing the adjustment of the track with the aid of Kelly forceps type.

Locations

Country Name City State
Brazil Faculty of Medicine of ABC Santo André São Paulo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Brazil, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Comparison of the cure rates between the mini sling and classical transobturator tapes Percentage of patients who are regarded as cured or improved based on the following criteria:
Negative Cough Stress test 1 year after surgery
Pad Test < 2 g 1 year after surgery
Up to one year No
Secondary Number of participants with adverse events Comparison of the intra- and postoperative complications between procedures 0, 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery Yes