Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03974633
Other study ID # 2018/0547
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date February 24, 2018
Est. completion date May 1, 2019

Study information

Verified date August 2019
Source Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Injections are associated to a certain level of pain which tolerance can vary between individuals. As regards non-invasive pain control techniques in subcutaneous injections, scarce literature exists with adequate levels of evidence and design quality to support any specific analgesic method.

In this study, the investigators evaluated the effectivity of three non-invasive analgesic techniques (cold, anesthetic cream and vibration) when performing subcutaneous forehead injections, in a series of 100 healthy volunteers.


Description:

This study is a randomized, controlled, simple-blind clinical trial, and it has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Research Institute Hospital La Fe. The study included 100 healthy volunteered, and it was performed in the University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia.

The procedures of the study consisted in the sequential performance of four injections of 0,1mL of physiologic saline (0,9%NaCl) in the forehead of each subject, 2cm above the eyebrows, with a 29G needle, after applying any of the non-invasive anesthetic methods studied in the trial, except for the control zone. The anesthetic method utilized in each part of the forehead of each patient was randomized through simple randomization. Injections always started from the right side of the forehead to the left. The non-invasive analgesic methods utilized were:

- Control zone: None

- Vibration: Application of the vibrating device on the skin below the injection site, before and during injection.

- Cold: Application of a bag of 50mL of frozen physiologic saline covered with a plastic glove on the injection site for 50 seconds prior to performing the injection.

- Anesthetic cream: Application of a uniform thickness of 2mm of the anesthetic cream EMLA covered with an adhesive transparent plastic dressing for 30 minutes, before injection.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date May 1, 2019
Est. primary completion date April 22, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Every subject who did not meet any of the exclusion criteria, and signed the informed consent, was included in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

- Subjects younger than 18

- Subjects that suffered from any local or systemic sensitivity alteration

- Subjects that suffered from any cognitive deficit

- Individuals allergic to any of the components of the anesthetic ointment EMLA (eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2,5% and prilocaine 2,5%).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Combination Product:
Injection
All information is included in the Arm/group descriptions

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe Valencia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Enrique Salmeron

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (7)

Babamiri K, Nassab R. The evidence for reducing the pain of administration of local anesthesia and cosmetic injectables. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2010 Sep;9(3):242-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2010.00503.x. Review. — View Citation

Davoudi A, Rismanchian M, Akhavan A, Nosouhian S, Bajoghli F, Haghighat A, Arbabzadeh F, Samimi P, Fiez A, Shadmehr E, Tabari K, Jahadi S. A brief review on the efficacy of different possible and nonpharmacological techniques in eliminating discomfort of local anesthesia injection during dental procedures. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Jan-Apr;10(1):13-6. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.167846. Review. — View Citation

Elibol O, Ozkan B, Hekimhan PK, Caglar Y. Efficacy of skin cooling and EMLA cream application for pain relief of periocular botulinum toxin injection. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;23(2):130-3. — View Citation

Ernst E, Fialka V. Ice freezes pain? A review of the clinical effectiveness of analgesic cold therapy. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994 Jan;9(1):56-9. Review. — View Citation

Simons FE, Gillespie CA, Simons KJ. Local anaesthetic creams and intradermal skin tests. Lancet. 1992 May 30;339(8805):1351-2. Erratum in: Lancet 1992 Jul 18;340(8812):188. — View Citation

Strazar AR, Leynes PG, Lalonde DH. Minimizing the pain of local anesthesia injection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Sep;132(3):675-84. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ad1e2. Review. — View Citation

Taddio A, Lord A, Hogan ME, Kikuta A, Yiu A, Darra E, Bruinse B, Keogh T, Stephens D. A randomized controlled trial of analgesia during vaccination in adults. Vaccine. 2010 Jul 19;28(32):5365-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.05.015. Epub 2010 May 16. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain referred per each zone injected: VAS Pain measured through a Visual Analogic Scale with values from 0 to 10; being 0 complete absence of pain, and 10 the worst pain ever experienced. 1 hour max
Secondary Discomfort associated to non-invasive analgesic techniques Discomfort associated to non-invasive analgesic techniques. Direct question in the survey in which answer options were each one of the non-invasive analgesic techniques (Cold, VIbration, Anesthetic cream) 1 hour max
Secondary Preference of non-invasive analgesic technique Preference of non-invasive analgesic technique. Direct question in the survey in which possible answer options were each one of the non-invasive analgesic techniques (Cold, VIbration, Anesthetic cream) 1 hour max