Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03590145
Other study ID # Aspetar
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date October 25, 2017
Est. completion date August 1, 2021

Study information

Verified date March 2022
Source Aspetar
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will investigate the reproducibility of a clinical diagnostic classification system for groin pain between two different examiners.


Description:

Groin pain is prevalent in field and court sport athletes. It is particularly prevalent in soccer, Gaelic football and rugby union. The wide variety of possible injuries in numerous anatomical structures and high prevalence of "abnormal imaging findings" in asymptomatic athletes contribute to the complexity. Heterogeneous taxonomy of groin injuries in athletes adds further to the confusion. Clinical practice is challenging with clinicians using differing groin pain terminology, where even the same term can have multiple interpretations. A recent systematic review on the treatment of groin pain in athletes included 72 studies, in which 33 different diagnostic terms were used. The "Doha agreement meeting on terminology and definitions in groin pain in athletes" was convened to attempt to resolve this problem. The Doha agreement meeting on terminology and definitions in groin pain in athletes reached a consensus on a clinically based taxonomy using three major categories. These definitions and terminology are based on history and physical examination to categorize athletes, making it simple and suitable for both clinical practice and research. The purpose of this study is therefore to investigate the inter-examiner reliability of the "Doha agreement meeting on terminology and definitions in groin pain in athletes." The study will be performed at a Sports Medicine Hospital in Qatar. Prior to the clinical examination participants will be requested to complete the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS). This is a patient-reported outcome measure, which quantifies a patient's current subjective perception of their hip and groin pain within the last week on six subscales, each with a score between 0 and 100. Additionally, participants will be requested to complete the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center (OSTRC) overuse injury questionnaire with a focus on groin problems within the last week. A standardized clinical examination will be performed. Palpation, resistance testing and stretching of affected muscle groups are used to categorize athletes into defined clinical entities. The pain reported by the athlete during the tests should also be felt in the affected structure. For example, in adductor-related groin pain, the pain on resisted adduction testing should reproduce the athlete's recognizable pain in the adductors. Pain felt in a different location-for example, the inguinal region on resisted adduction testing-would not signify adductor-related groin pain. Statistical analyses Cohen's Kappa statistic (κ) is used to signify agreement between clinicians. Agreement was considered almost perfect if κ=0.81-1.00, moderate κ=0.41-0.60, substantial κ=0.61-0.80, fair κ=0.21-0.40, slight κ=0-0.20, and poor if κ<0. In addition, absolute agreement, prevalence, and bias index will be calculated. Statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS software. Sample size With two examiners at each site, an expected Kappa of at least 0.8 with a lower limit of a 95% confidence interval of 0.4, and an expected prevalence between 0.3-0.7 for the three expected main defined clinical entities (adductor-related, inguinal-related, and iliopsoas-related groin pain), assuming no bias between examiners, the required sample size is determined to be 48 using a 2-tailed test. As pubic-related and hip-related groin pain is expected to be less frequent, a lower limit confidence interval of 0 for these entities is accepted, which in a 1-tailed test, maintaining an expected kappa of 0.8, requires a sample of only 10 participants. Thus 48 participants will be included.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 48
Est. completion date August 1, 2021
Est. primary completion date March 3, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Male
Age group 18 Years to 40 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - adult (?18y) male individuals regularly participating in recreational or elite sports activity (=once/week). - current primary complaint of hip and/or groin pain of a non-acute onset that worsens on exercise, or of acute onset, which has not recovered and become longstanding (?6w). Exclusion Criteria: - any prior assessment or treatment from one of the examiners for the same complaints. - fractures or acute injuries with severe pain were it would be unethical to examine the athlete twice.

Study Design


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
Clinical examination
Standardized clinical examination consisting of pain provocation test, including palpation, muscle resistance and stretch test.

Locations

Country Name City State
Qatar Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital Doha

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Aspetar University College Dublin

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Qatar, 

References & Publications (8)

Branci S, Thorborg K, Nielsen MB, Hölmich P. Radiological findings in symphyseal and adductor-related groin pain in athletes: a critical review of the literature. Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;47(10):611-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091905. Epub 2013 Feb 12. Review. — View Citation

Clarsen B, Myklebust G, Bahr R. Development and validation of a new method for the registration of overuse injuries in sports injury epidemiology: the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre (OSTRC) overuse injury questionnaire. Br J Sports Med. 2013 May;47(8):495-502. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091524. Epub 2012 Oct 4. — View Citation

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74. — View Citation

Serner A, van Eijck CH, Beumer BR, Hölmich P, Weir A, de Vos RJ. Study quality on groin injury management remains low: a systematic review on treatment of groin pain in athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;49(12):813. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094256. Epub 2015 Jan 29. Review. — View Citation

Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005 Mar;85(3):257-68. Review. — View Citation

Taylor R, Vuckovic Z, Mosler A, Agricola R, Otten R, Jacobsen P, Holmich P, Weir A. Multidisciplinary Assessment of 100 Athletes With Groin Pain Using the Doha Agreement: High Prevalence of Adductor-Related Groin Pain in Conjunction With Multiple Causes. Clin J Sport Med. 2018 Jul;28(4):364-369. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000469. — View Citation

Thorborg K, Hölmich P, Christensen R, Petersen J, Roos EM. The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. Br J Sports Med. 2011 May;45(6):478-91. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.080937. Erratum in: Br J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;45(9):742. — View Citation

Weir A, Brukner P, Delahunt E, Ekstrand J, Griffin D, Khan KM, Lovell G, Meyers WC, Muschaweck U, Orchard J, Paajanen H, Philippon M, Reboul G, Robinson P, Schache AG, Schilders E, Serner A, Silvers H, Thorborg K, Tyler T, Verrall G, de Vos RJ, Vuckovic Z, Hölmich P. Doha agreement meeting on terminology and definitions in groin pain in athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;49(12):768-74. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094869. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Clinical entity Patients are diagnosed with one or multiple clinical entities:
"Adductor-related" (adductor tenderness AND pain on resisted adduction testing), "Pubic-related" (local tenderness of the pubic symphysis and the immediately adjacent bone), "Iliopsoas-related" (iliopsoas tenderness AND more likely with pain on resisted hip flexion AND/OR pain on stretching of the iliopsoas), "Inguinal-related" (pain location in the inguinal canal region AND tenderness of the inguinal canal. No palpable inguinal hernia. More likely if the pain is aggravated with resistance testing of the abdominal muscles OR on Valsalva/cough/sneeze), or "Hip-related" (clinical suspicion, either through history or clinical examination. Specific diagnosis will require further investigations and will not be included in this study), or "Other" (any cause of groin pain which cannot be included with in the specified clinical entities).
Oct 2017 - June 2019
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03023462 - Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT04272320 - The Efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT03904888 - Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT03856710 - Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT02240550 - A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT01943760 - Tamadol Wound Infiltration in Children Under Inguinal Hernioplasty Phase 4
Completed NCT01679353 - Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Magnesium Added to Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Alone in Caudal Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT01450345 - Efficacy of Pre-operative Oral Pregabalin in Ambulatory Inguinal Hernia Repair for Post Operative Pain Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT00968773 - Rebound Hernia Repair Device Mesh Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT01000116 - Fibrin Glue Versus Tacked Fixation in Groin Hernia Repair (TAPP) N/A
Completed NCT01117337 - Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Phase 4
Terminated NCT00226161 - Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy N/A
Completed NCT05837013 - Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia N/A
Recruiting NCT05058378 - Correlation Between Spinal Anesthesia and Perfusion Index
Completed NCT01637818 - Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT05879770 - Is the Use of Prolene as Sufficient as the Use of Wire in Shouldice Surgery to Keep the Recurrence Rate Low After One Year?
Completed NCT05159232 - Length of Hospital Stay in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Vs. Open Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT05107986 - Laparoscopy in Complicated Groin Hernia
Active, not recruiting NCT04328597 - Portuguese Inguinal Hernia Cohort (PINE) Study
Completed NCT04033055 - Antalgic Efficacy of CycloMesh™ Soaked in Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia. N/A