Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Recurrency After Inguinal Herniorraphy With Bi-layer Mesh
Aim The overall aim with this study is to improve outcome after inguinal hernia repair
(IHR). It is not known today if a re-operation due to recurrence after bi-layer mesh IHR is
more complicated than compared with the golden standard method.
Method This project is a registry study. The National hernia register (Svenskt
bråckregister, SBR) which started in 1992 include data that cover nearly 100% of all the
country's hernia operations.
Patient data are collected from SBR. Patients who at the time of surgery were between 18-75
years of age and operated on due to primary inguinal hernia with any of the two mentioned
techniques between 1992-2012 are eligible
Background Surgical repair for inguinal hernia is the most common surgical procedure in the
world. Since the introduction of repair with mesh reinforcement, relapses have decreased
significantly. Recurrence of inguinal hernia affects only 1-2% after inguinal hernia repair
(IHR) [1] and is no longer considered to be a big problem. One problem is that a large
proportion of patients undergoing surgery develop chronic pain from the surgical area [2-4].
New meshes, with new design and new materials are continuously being introduced, with the
aim of reducing the incidence of chronic pain. One of the most common meshes in use today is
the so-called "double-mesh" (bi-layer mesh) [1, 5]. Several studies have shown that bi-layer
mesh can lead to some gains for the patient initially after surgery, but there is no
scientific evidence available that suggest that bi-layer mesh is superior the traditional
tension-free mesh repair in the long term [6, 7]. Several reports have shown that bi-layer
mesh repair give results as good as the golden standard method, where a single sheet mesh is
used.
The surgical technique differ somewhat with respect to which layer of the abdominal is being
used [8], when using a bi-layer- or a single sheet mesh. With the bi-layer mesh you use the
abdominal layer that is usually used (the pre-peritoneal space) in case of re-operation due
to recurrence after open mesh repair. Re-operation after bi-layer mesh IHR is incompletely
studied and it is unclear if this is a more difficult surgical procedure compared with
re-operation for recurrence after standard IHR.
Aim The overall aim with this study is to improve outcome after IHR. It is not known today
if a re-operation due to recurrence after bi-layer mesh IHR is more complicated than
compared with the golden standard method.
Method This project is a registry study. The National hernia register (Svenskt
bråckregister, SBR) which started in 1992 include data that cover nearly 100% of all the
country's hernia operations.
Patient data are collected from SBR. Patients who at the time of surgery were between 18-75
years of age and operated on due to primary inguinal hernia with any of the two mentioned
techniques between 1992-2012 are eligible.
Statistics Parametric and non-parametric statistical methods for descriptive analysis will
be used for comparison within and between the groups. Students t-test.
Power calculation The primary outcome variable for this registry study is the prevalence of
recurrence after bi-layer mesh IHR. This is incompletely mapped. There is no need of a power
calculation because the material of the registry is very large and any relevant differences
between the groups should easily be detected.
Gain of knowledge The results of the study could show that either method of IHR (eg bi-layer
mesh) is less suitable in surgical repair of inguinal hernia, which could be troublesome for
those patients who had surgery with the method.
;
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT03023462 -
Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04272320 -
The Efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03904888 -
Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03856710 -
Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02240550 -
A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT01943760 -
Tamadol Wound Infiltration in Children Under Inguinal Hernioplasty
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT01679353 -
Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Magnesium Added to Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Alone in Caudal Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT01450345 -
Efficacy of Pre-operative Oral Pregabalin in Ambulatory Inguinal Hernia Repair for Post Operative Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT00968773 -
Rebound Hernia Repair Device Mesh Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT01000116 -
Fibrin Glue Versus Tacked Fixation in Groin Hernia Repair (TAPP)
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT01117337 -
Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
Phase 4 | |
| Terminated |
NCT00226161 -
Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05837013 -
Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05058378 -
Correlation Between Spinal Anesthesia and Perfusion Index
|
||
| Completed |
NCT01637818 -
Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05879770 -
Is the Use of Prolene as Sufficient as the Use of Wire in Shouldice Surgery to Keep the Recurrence Rate Low After One Year?
|
||
| Completed |
NCT05159232 -
Length of Hospital Stay in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Vs. Open Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05107986 -
Laparoscopy in Complicated Groin Hernia
|
||
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04328597 -
Portuguese Inguinal Hernia Cohort (PINE) Study
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04033055 -
Antalgic Efficacy of CycloMesh™ Soaked in Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia.
|
N/A |