Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03002259 |
Other study ID # |
69 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
Phase 4
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 1, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
January 31, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2023 |
Source |
Bayside Health |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Background. Numerous studies have investigated high-dose corticosteroids in cardiac surgery,
but with mixed results leading to ongoing variations in practice around the world. The
Dexamethasone for Cardiac Surgery-II Trial (DECS-II) is a study comparing high-dose
dexamethasone with placebo in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Methods. We discuss the rationale for conducting DECS-II, a 2800-patient, pragmatic,
multicenter, assessor-blinded, randomized trial in cardiac surgery, and the features of the
DECS-II study design (objectives, end points, target population, balanced clusters based on
practice preference with post-randomization consent, treatments, patient follow-up and
analysis).
Conclusions. The DECS-II Trial will use a novel, efficient trial design to evaluate whether
high-dose dexamethasone has a patient-centered benefit of enhancing recovery and increasing
the number of days at home after cardiac surgery.
Description:
High-dose corticosteroids attenuate the inflammatory response to surgery with CPB and are
commonly used in some countries,but uncommonly in the US, Canada and Australia. Steroids can
reliably attenuate activation of the complement pathways associated with cardiac surgery, but
clinical trials have had mixed results. The current evidence is dominated by the results of
two recent large randomized trials: DECS (n=4,494)6 and SIRS (n=7,507).
Both DECS and SIRS assigned patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB to receive either a
high intraoperative dose of steroids (dexamethasone 1 mg/kg, or methylprednisolone 500 mg,
respectively) or placebo. The point estimates of both trials suggested a possible reduction
in serious complications and mortality. Planned subgroup analyses in the DECS trial steroids
reduced the incidence of respiratory failure (3.0 % vs. 4.3%, P=0.02), infection (9.5% vs.
14.8%, P=0.009), and shortened hospital stay (median 8 [7-13] vs. 9 [7-13] days, P=0.009).6
Severe renal failure (need for RRT) was reduced, 0.4% vs. 1.0%, P=0.04.8 But SIRS found
methylprednisolone was associated with a higher incidence of myocardial injury (as measured
by elevation of CK-MB enzyme). Nether trial identified a higher risk of myocardial infarction
(MI). The methylprednisolone-induced elevation of CK-MB may therefore be a class effect.
Another compelling finding in pre-planned subgroup analysis of patient age groups is that
when limiting analysis to those aged less than 75 years in the DECS trial, dexamethasone
reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint, RR 0.74 (95% CI: 0.58-0.95), P=0.017; as
well as respiratory failure RR 0.62 (95% CI: 0.42-0.91), P=0.014; and possibly mortality RR
0.53 (95% CI: 0.26-1.10), P=0.08.6 This age-interaction effect is supported by the
demonstration of increased C-reactive protein concentrations in younger patients enrolled in
the DECS trial.
Therefore, it is highly plausible that prophylactic steroids can suppress deregulated
inflammation and thus improve outcomes in cardiac surgery, but only when used in a less
elderly (i.e. <75 years) patient population.
In retrospect, the primary endpoints of both DECS and SIRS trials can be challenged, in that
they used composites heavily weighted by thrombotic events (MI, stroke) and not specific to
inflammation (respiratory failure, kidney injury, sepsis, prolonged ICU and hospital stay,
mortality). We thus plan to re-evaluate dexamethasone in cardiac surgery, using a
patient-centred, clinically important endpoint focused on enhanced recovery and earlier
hospital discharge: "days alive and at home up to 30 days after surgery".