View clinical trials related to Infections.
Filter by:In the absence of a vaccine, the spread of SARS-CoV-2 can only be mitigated via non-pharmaceutical interventions that reduce the risks of forward transmission. Currently, European policymakers are implementing combinations of fierce pandemic control measures. However, there is substantial uncertainty on the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 and, consequently, the effect of each specific mitigation intervention as well as their joint impact on the pandemic evolution. Moreover, it is uncertain how and when the Public Health response should be modified once the pandemic starts to slow. There is an urgent need for data that can help to further unravel the key transmission characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 in the population. Household studies are, therefore, a useful approach to obtain insight into the main determinants of transmission and to derive estimates of transmission parameters. By fully characterizing the critical process of SARS-CoV-2 household transmission and how they vary by patient and household characteristics, infection dynamics in the population can be further elucidated. Responding to SARS-CoV-2 effectively from a community care perspective will also require understanding the perceptions, beliefs, and actions taken by patients and the public. A 'bottom-up' understating of such issues is critical to understand how best to design effective community strategies. Rapid European COVID-19 Emergency Research response (RECOVER) is a project involving ten international partners that have been selected for funding by the European Union under the Horizon 2020 research framework. RECOVER responds to call topic SC1-PHE-CORONAVIRUS-2020: Advancing knowledge for the clinical and public health response to the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and builds on many years of investment by the European Commission in clinical research preparedness for epidemic response. RECOVER will therefore provide a range of data and analytical results to guide the Public Health response, including the here described household transmission study. Objective: Estimate key transmission parameters of SARS-CoV-2 in Europe from observing within household virus spread and seroconversion of household members and characterize the views and experiences of households regarding perceptions, practices regarding infection control, and impacts of imposed isolation measures.
This is a Phase 2, randomized, multi-center study in approximately 300 adults who received 2 doses of aH5N1c or placebo in and completed the parent study V89_18 in the <65 years of age cohort. The study investigates whether two priming doses of MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 cell culture-derived vaccine (aH5N1c) followed by one or two booster vaccinations with a MF59-adjuvanted H5N6 cell culture derived vaccine (aH5N6c) 3 weeks apart elicit immune responses to the antigens used for priming (H5N1) and boosting (H5N6) after first and second heterologous booster vaccination. Eligible subjects, who received 2 doses of aH5N1c in the parent study V89_18 are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either two aH5N6c vaccinations, 3 weeks apart (group 1) or an aH5N6c vaccination on Day 1 and saline placebo on Day 22 (group 2). Eligible subjects, who received placebo in the parent study will receive two aH5N6c vaccinations, 3 weeks apart (group 3). After the second vaccine administration, subjects are monitored for approximately 6 months for safety and antibody persistence. The total study duration will be approximately 7 months per subject.
Because of the increasing incidence of infections with multi-drug resistant enterobacteriaceae, we need alternative treatments to spare carbapenems. Temocillin could be an interesting option but its position is only defined for the curative treatment of urinary tract infections. We would like to explore others indications comparing two groups : one using temocillin empirically for treatment or prophylaxis and the second using it in second line whatever the indication is.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the detection ability of Helicobacter pylori 23S rRNA/gyrA gene mutation detection kit (fluorescent PCR fusion curve method) for Helicobacter pylori gene mutation.
This is a Phase 1 dose escalating study to assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of ShigETEC, a live, attenuated Shigella/ETEC combination vaccine given orally to healthy European adults 18 to 45 years of age. The major aim is the development of an efficacious and safe vaccine that prevents diarrhea caused by Shigella and ETEC in travelers, military personal visiting endemic countries and children of the developing world. This Phase 1 safety and immunogenicity study used a double-blind, placebo-control design and was conducted in two stages, a single ascending and a multiple ascending stage.
There is excess accumulation of bradykinin during symptomatic SARS CoV-2 lung infection. Bradykinin causes oedema in the lung, with reduced oxygen. It also causes vasodilation, hypotension and cytokine release.
Trial purpose is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and reactogenicity of the Vaccine for the prevention of infections caused by Haemophilus Influenzae Type b in volunteers aged 18-50.
This is a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving newly diagnosed Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) patients. Patients will be prescribed with standard triple therapy for 2 weeks and supplemented with either probiotic (Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17648) or placebo for 4 weeks. In this study, we are investigating the effect of Lactobacillus reuteri in H. pylori eradication; mainly in improving eradication rate, ameliorating gastrointestinal symptoms and reducing adverse effects of antibiotics. We hypothesised that in H. pylori patients receiving Lactobacillus reuteri as adjunct treatment, there will be an improvement in H. pylori eradication rate as well as reduction of gastrointestinal symptoms and treatment adverse effects.
Hip and knee total joint arthroplasty are one of the most frequently performed surgery worldwide. However, prosthetic joint infection remains a devastating complication of them, associated with severe morbidity, increased mortality and huge costs. Several underlying medical conditions that have been identified as independent risk factors for development of prosthetic joint infection. The hypothesis of the study is that by utilizing the waiting time for operation (6 -12 months) to improve the state of known modifiable risk factors the frequency of prosthetic joint infection may be decreased. This optimization was established with co-operation between hospital and primary care. Therefore a prospective non-randomized quality control study before and after an intervention regarding preoperative preparation for total joint arthroplasty of either hip or knee was planned. The control arm was included one week prior to surgery at the anesthesia preoperative assessment outpatient clinic and were operated on between 27/8 2018 and 7/9 2020 and consists of 738 patients. Inclusion of the interventional arm happened at the orthopedic outpatient clinic from 2/1 2019 - 30/1 2021, 6 -12 months prior to surgery and an appointment with their general physician ensured within 3 weeks for further evaluation. Enlisted have been 1010 patients, operation of them started 25/3 2019 and to date 710 patients have been operated on, but due to delays caused by Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) surgery of them is still ongoing. The effect of the intervention will be evaluated with by comparison of patient characteristics and frequency of surgical site and prosthetic joint infections before and after.
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is potentially catastrophic in neurosurgical procedures, causing poor in-hospital outcomes in more than half of those affected and significantly increased length of hospital stay. The appropriate and timely use of prophylactic antibiotics is found to reduce the prevalence of SSIs. At present, several regimen of antimicrobial agents are used in neurosurgical procedures since the choice of appropriate antibiotic agent is not fully established. Cephalosporins are among the frequently used antibiotics for prophylaxis in neurosurgical procedures, with studies comparing first and second generation Cephalosporins to third generation in neurosurgical prophylaxis, showing no superiority of the latter over the former. Clearly, comparing Cefuroxime (a second generation Cephalosporin) to Ceftriaxone (a third generation Cephalosporin) in neurosurgical procedures will provide more knowledge on the efficacy of Cefuroxime as antibiotics prophylaxis. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the comparative efficacy of cefuroxime versus ceftriaxone in the prevention of surgical site infection after neurosurgical procedures at the University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria. METHODS: The study will be a randomized controlled trial recruiting 92 participants. Participants would be patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures; they will be randomized to treatment arms (those receiving cefuroxime versus ceftriaxone for antibiotic prophylaxis). All the study articipants will be followed up for 30 days to assess for the development of surgical site infection. DATA ANALYSIS: Data will be collated, computed and analyzed using the Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) Version 21. Demographics will be presented using summary statistics; mean +/- standard deviation and figures (e.g pie chart, histogram). Study outcomes will yield categorical and continuous variables which will be analyzed using chi-squared test and Z-test and/or T-test for hypothesis testing.