Induction of Labor Clinical Trial
— OMSOfficial title:
A Randomised Control Study of Titrated and Static Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term
Verified date | May 2021 |
Source | Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
AIM: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of titrated oral misoprostol solution (OMS) in comparison with static-dose oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor at term. Women with singleton live pregnancy at term without any complications who were admitted in labor room for induction of labor were enrolled. Study involves allocation of selected women in two groups randomly and use of either titrated or static oral misoprostol dose regimen to induce labor. Possible benefits included rapid induction of labor with oral drug regimen which is easier to comply as compared to vaginal regimens. Women were at risk of all the complications associated with induction of labor like labor abnormalities, risk of cesarean section, non reassuring fetal status.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 264 |
Est. completion date | November 30, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | November 30, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 40 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Singleton live pregnancy; 2. =37 weeks gestation; 3. Cephalic presentation; 4. Reassuring fetal heart rate; 5. Modified Bishop'score Exclusion Criteria: 1. Hypersensitivity to misoprostol; 2. Uterine scar due to previous cesarean section or other uterine surgery; 3. Grand multipara; 4. Multiple gestations; 5. High risk pregnanacies • preeeclampsia with severe features • significant maternal cardiac,renal, liver disease 6. Any contraindication to induction and vaginal delivery e.g. cephalopelvic disproportion, malpresentation, fetal compromise and ante partum hemorrhage 7. Intrauterine fetal demise |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
India | Christian Medical College and Hospital | Ludhiana | Punjab |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India |
India,
Aduloju OP, Ipinnimo OM, Aduloju T. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial of hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Feb;34(4):493-499. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1610378. Epub 2019 Apr 29. — View Citation
Rouzi AA, Alsahly N, Alamoudi R, Almansouri N, Alsinani N, Alkafy S, Rozzah R, Abduljabbar H. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):405.e1-405.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1054. Epub 2016 Dec 14. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Interval between induction and delivery | The time taken from induction of labor to delivery measured as
1) <12 hours 2) 12-24 hours 3) 24-48 hours 4) >48 hours |
From first dose of oral misoprostol solution (titrated/static) to childbirth; upto 5 days | |
Secondary | Mean change in modified Bishop's score | Measured as difference between modified bishop's score before induction of labor and at amniotomy/stopping of oral misoprostol solution regimen; minimum 0f 1 to maximum of 7. | From first dose of oral misoprostol solution to childbirth (intrapartum); upto 5 days | |
Secondary | Number of misoprostol doses | Measured as 1-2; 3-4; 5-6; 7-8; >9 | From first dose of oral misoprostol solution to childbirth (intrapartum); upto 5 days | |
Secondary | Time taken to give required doses | Measured as 1-4 hours; 5-8 hours; 9-12 hours; 13-16 hours; 17-20 hours; 21-24 hours | From first dose of oral misoprostol solution to childbirth (intrapartum); upto 5 days | |
Secondary | Total misoprostol dosage | Measured as =75mcg; 76-150mcg; 151-225mcg; 226-300mcg; >301 mcg | From first dose of oral misoprostol solution to childbirth (intrapartum); upto 5 days | |
Secondary | Mode of delivery | In terms of Vaginal delivery/LSCS | Upto 5 days from first dose of oral misoprostol solution | |
Secondary | Indication for LSCS | Divided into either of the following:
SECONDARY ARREST OF DILATATION MSAF IN EARLY LABOR CTG CATEGORY III FAILED INDUCTION CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTION CORD PROLAPSE DEEP TRANSVERSE ARREST ARREST OF DESCENT OF HEAD |
Upto 5 days from first dose of oral misoprostol solution | |
Secondary | Oxytocin augmentation | Required/Not required | From first dose of oral misoprostol solution to childbirth (intrapartum); upto 5 days | |
Secondary | Maternal morbidity | In terms of incidence of either of the following:
Incidence of tachysystole Fever- intrapartum and postpartum Puerperal sepsis Uterine rupture |
From first dose of oral misoprostol solution to dischage from hospital; upto 7 days | |
Secondary | Neonatal parameters | Measured in terms of incidence of either of the following:
Incidence of meconium-stained liquor APGAR scores at 1,5 min NICU stay |
From childbirth to discharge of the baby; upto 1 month |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01127581 -
Efficacy & Safety Study Comparing Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) for Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01139801 -
Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor: Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Conjunction With Foley Balloon
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06324279 -
Cervical Sliding Sign to Predict Outcome of Induction of Labor
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05864326 -
Heated Saline in Cervical Balloon for Labor Induction, a RCT
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06056141 -
Induction of Labour at Term With Low Dose Oral Misoprostol Versus a Foley Catheter
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04529837 -
Ultrasound Assessment of DILAPAN-S
|
||
Completed |
NCT02477085 -
Methods of Labor Induction and Perinatal Outcomes
|
||
Completed |
NCT02098421 -
Foley Labor Induction Trial at Term and in PROM
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03138252 -
Study of the Effectiveness of Cervical Ripening Balloon With and Without Oxytocin
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01720394 -
Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00451308 -
Induction of Labor With a Foley Balloon Catheter: Inflation With 30ml Compared to 60ml
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05511727 -
Use of Single Versus Double Foley's Catheter in Pre-induction Cervical Ripening
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02762942 -
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Supracervical Balloon Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01283022 -
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of the 200 Microgram (mcg) Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI 200) in Women at Term Gestation (The MVI-PK Study)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00684606 -
Transcervical Foley Catheter With or Without Oxytocin for Induction of Labor
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05759364 -
The Effect of IV PAPAVERINE 80 mg Prior to Catheter Balloon Insertion on Bishop Score and Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03854383 -
Using Isosorbide Mononitrate in Reducing Time in Induction of Labor in Post Date Women
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01428037 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03752073 -
Comparison of Two Mechanical Methods of Outpatient Ripening of the Cervix
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03045939 -
Cervical Ripening With the Double Balloon Device for 6 Hours Compared With 12 Hours
|
N/A |