Induction of Labor Clinical Trial
Official title:
Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol In Combination With Foley Bulb for Labor Induction at Term: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Combined misoprostol and Foley bulb catheter has been shown to be an effective induction method. However, optimal route of administration for misoprostol has not been established. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of combination buccal miso-foley to combination vaginal miso-foley for third trimester cervical ripening and induction of labor.
This randomized controlled trial of consenting women undergoing induction of labor with combined misoprostol and Foley catheter seeks to efficacy of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol route of administration. This project will include 216 women presenting at Christiana Care Health System. Women will be included if they are at least 37 weeks gestation, have a singleton pregnancy, have intact membranes and are undergoing an induction of labor using a Foley catheter combined with misoprostol. Following admission, women will be randomized into either vaginal or buccal misoprostol. Women will be randomized with equal probability to the intervention group using block randomization stratified by party. Patients will receive 25 micrograms of misoprostol along with the insertion of a16F Foley catheter. Misoprostol can be repeated up to five additional times for a maximum of 24 hours or a total of 6 doses if the patient is not contracting more than 3 times per 10 minutes. The remainder of labor management will be at the discretion of each woman's obstetric provider. Prior to discharge from the hospital, baseline demographic and clinical data will be obtained via chart review ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01127581 -
Efficacy & Safety Study Comparing Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) for Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01139801 -
Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor: Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Conjunction With Foley Balloon
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06324279 -
Cervical Sliding Sign to Predict Outcome of Induction of Labor
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05864326 -
Heated Saline in Cervical Balloon for Labor Induction, a RCT
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06056141 -
Induction of Labour at Term With Low Dose Oral Misoprostol Versus a Foley Catheter
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04529837 -
Ultrasound Assessment of DILAPAN-S
|
||
Completed |
NCT02477085 -
Methods of Labor Induction and Perinatal Outcomes
|
||
Completed |
NCT02098421 -
Foley Labor Induction Trial at Term and in PROM
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03138252 -
Study of the Effectiveness of Cervical Ripening Balloon With and Without Oxytocin
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01720394 -
Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00451308 -
Induction of Labor With a Foley Balloon Catheter: Inflation With 30ml Compared to 60ml
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05511727 -
Use of Single Versus Double Foley's Catheter in Pre-induction Cervical Ripening
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02762942 -
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Supracervical Balloon Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01283022 -
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of the 200 Microgram (mcg) Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI 200) in Women at Term Gestation (The MVI-PK Study)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00684606 -
Transcervical Foley Catheter With or Without Oxytocin for Induction of Labor
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05759364 -
The Effect of IV PAPAVERINE 80 mg Prior to Catheter Balloon Insertion on Bishop Score and Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03854383 -
Using Isosorbide Mononitrate in Reducing Time in Induction of Labor in Post Date Women
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01428037 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03752073 -
Comparison of Two Mechanical Methods of Outpatient Ripening of the Cervix
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03045939 -
Cervical Ripening With the Double Balloon Device for 6 Hours Compared With 12 Hours
|
N/A |