Induction of Labor Clinical Trial
— EXPEDITEOfficial title:
Phase III, Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Exogenous Prostaglandin Comparing the Efficacy & Safety of the MVI 200 mcg Versus the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) for Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery in Pregnant Women at Term
Verified date | April 2014 |
Source | Ferring Pharmaceuticals |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 200 microgram (mcg) can decrease the time to vaginal delivery compared to the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) 10 milligram (mg) in pregnant women requiring cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 1358 |
Est. completion date | March 2012 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2012 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Provide written informed consent; - Pregnant women at = 36 weeks 0 days inclusive gestation; - Women aged 18 years or older; - Candidate for pharmacological induction of labor; - Single, live vertex fetus; - Baseline modified Bishop score = 4; - Parity = 3 (parity is defined as one or more births live or dead after 24 weeks gestation); - Body Mass Index (BMI) = 50 at the time of entry to the study. Exclusion Criteria: - Women in active labor; - Presence of uterine or cervical scar or uterine abnormality e.g., bicornate uterus. Biopsies, including cone biopsy of the cervix, are permitted; - Administration of oxytocin or any cervical ripening or labor inducing agents (including mechanical methods) or a tocolytic drug within 7 days prior to enrollment. Magnesium sulfate is permitted if prescribed as treatment for pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension; - Severe pre-eclampsia marked by Hemolytic anemia, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelet count (HELLP) syndrome, other end-organ affliction or Central Nervous System (CNS) findings other than mild headache; - Fetal malpresentation; - Diagnosed congenital anomalies, not including polydactyly; - Any evidence of fetal compromise at baseline (e.g., non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern or meconium staining); - Amnioinfusion or other treatment of non-reassuring fetal status at any time prior to the induction attempt; - Ruptured membranes = 48 hours prior to the start of treatment; - Suspected chorioamnionitis; - Fever (oral or aural temperature > 37.5°C); - Any condition in which vaginal delivery is contraindicated e.g., placenta previa or any unexplained genital bleeding at any time after 24 weeks during this pregnancy; - Known or suspected allergy to misoprostol, dinoprostone, other prostaglandins or any of the excipients; - Any condition urgently requiring delivery; - Unable to comply with the protocol. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of New Mexico/New Mexico Health Science Center | Albuquerque | New Mexico |
United States | University of Michigan Hospital | Ann Arbor | Michigan |
United States | Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | UT College of Medicine Chattanooga, Erlanger Health System | Chattanooga | Tennessee |
United States | University of Cincinnati | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | Clinical Trials of America | Eugene | Oregon |
United States | The Women's Clinic of Northern Colorado | Fort Collins | Colorado |
United States | Spectrum Health | Grand Rapids | Michigan |
United States | East Carolina University, Brody School of Medicine | Greenville | North Carolina |
United States | University Medical Group/Greenville Hospital System | Greenville | South Carolina |
United States | University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston | Houston | Texas |
United States | Indiana University School of Medicine | Indianapolis | Indiana |
United States | University of FL College of Medicine | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | University of Kansas School of Medicine | Kansas City | Kansas |
United States | High Risk Obstetrical Consultants, PLLC | Knoxville | Tennessee |
United States | Altus Research | Lake Worth | Florida |
United States | Miller's Childrens Hospital | Long Beach | California |
United States | Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation | Marshfield | Wisconsin |
United States | Research Memphis Associates | Memphis | Tennessee |
United States | St. Peters University Hospital | New Brunswick | New Jersey |
United States | Christiana Care Health System (DE Center for MFM) | Newark | Delaware |
United States | UCI Medical Center | Orange | California |
United States | Drexel University College of Medicine | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Temple University School of Medicine | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Thomas Jefferson University | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Maricopa Medical Center - District Medical Group | Phoenix | Arizona |
United States | Precision Trials | Phoenix | Arizona |
United States | Salt Lake Women's Center, PC | Sandy | Utah |
United States | Phoenix Perinatal Associates (Scottsdale Healthcare Shea) | Scottsdale | Arizona |
United States | St. Louis University | St. Louis | Missouri |
United States | University of South Florida | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Watching Over Mothers and Babies Foundation | Tucson | Arizona |
United States | Lyndhurst Gynecologic Associates | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Ferring Pharmaceuticals |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Time to Vaginal Delivery During the First Hospital Admission | Interval from study drug administration to vaginal delivery (average 24 hours) | No | |
Primary | Incidence of Cesarean Delivery During the First Hospital Admission | Interval from study drug administration to cesarean delivery (average 24 hours) | Yes | |
Secondary | Time to Any Delivery (Vaginal or Cesarean) During the First Hospital Admission | Interval from study drug administration to neonate delivery (average 24 hours) | No | |
Secondary | Time to Active Labor During the First Hospital Admission | Active labor was defined as progressive cervical dilatation to 4 cm with any frequency of contractions OR rhythmic, firm, adequate quality uterine contractions causing progressive cervical change occurring at a frequency of 3 or more in 10 minutes and lasting 45 seconds or more. | Interval from study drug administration to active labor (average 12 hours) | No |
Secondary | Incidence of Pre-delivery Oxytocin During the First Hospital Admission | Percentage of participants in receipt of Oxytocin for induction after study drug removal. | At least 30 minutes after study drug removal | No |
Secondary | Incidence of Vaginal Delivery Within 12 Hours | Interval from study drug administration to vaginal delivery within 12 hours | No | |
Secondary | Incidence of Any Delivery Within 24 Hours | Interval from study drug administration to delivery of neonate within 24 hours | No | |
Secondary | Incidence of Any Delivery Within 12 Hours | Interval from study drug administration to delivery of neonate within 12 hours | No | |
Secondary | Incidence of Vaginal Delivery Within 24 Hours | Interval from study drug administration to vaginal delivery within 24 hours | No | |
Secondary | Incidence of Vaginal Delivery | Interval from study drug administration to vaginal delivery (average 24 hours) | No | |
Secondary | Rate of Adverse Events | All adverse events were rated by the Investigator as mild, moderate or severe and classified as having no relationship, possible relationship or a probable relationship to the study drug. | From study drug administration to hospital discharge (approximately 48-72 hours) | Yes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01139801 -
Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor: Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Conjunction With Foley Balloon
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06324279 -
Cervical Sliding Sign to Predict Outcome of Induction of Labor
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05864326 -
Heated Saline in Cervical Balloon for Labor Induction, a RCT
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06056141 -
Induction of Labour at Term With Low Dose Oral Misoprostol Versus a Foley Catheter
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04529837 -
Ultrasound Assessment of DILAPAN-S
|
||
Completed |
NCT02477085 -
Methods of Labor Induction and Perinatal Outcomes
|
||
Completed |
NCT02098421 -
Foley Labor Induction Trial at Term and in PROM
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03138252 -
Study of the Effectiveness of Cervical Ripening Balloon With and Without Oxytocin
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01720394 -
Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00451308 -
Induction of Labor With a Foley Balloon Catheter: Inflation With 30ml Compared to 60ml
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05511727 -
Use of Single Versus Double Foley's Catheter in Pre-induction Cervical Ripening
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02762942 -
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Supracervical Balloon Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01283022 -
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of the 200 Microgram (mcg) Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI 200) in Women at Term Gestation (The MVI-PK Study)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00684606 -
Transcervical Foley Catheter With or Without Oxytocin for Induction of Labor
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05759364 -
The Effect of IV PAPAVERINE 80 mg Prior to Catheter Balloon Insertion on Bishop Score and Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03854383 -
Using Isosorbide Mononitrate in Reducing Time in Induction of Labor in Post Date Women
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01428037 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03752073 -
Comparison of Two Mechanical Methods of Outpatient Ripening of the Cervix
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03045939 -
Cervical Ripening With the Double Balloon Device for 6 Hours Compared With 12 Hours
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03976037 -
Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol In Combination With Foley Bulb
|
Early Phase 1 |