Induction of Labor Clinical Trial
Official title:
Weighted Bag Versus Inner Thigh Taping for Cervical Ripening With a Foley Catheter Prior to an Induction of Labor
This study aims to determine what type of traction, weighted bag or inner thigh taping, on
foley catheters for cervical ripening results in a greater cervical dilation and shorter
length of labor.
The primary outcomes are post-ripening dilation of 3 cm or more and time to delivery.
The secondary outcomes are patient pain/comfort rating and method of delivery. The
investigators hypothesize that the use a weighted bag will result in a 20% increase in
post-ripening dilation of at least 3 cm and a shorter average length of labor.
Over the last 20 years the number of induced labors doubled so that over one in five births
in 2003 was induced. In response to the rising need for cervical ripening the American
College Obstetricians and Gynecologists have stated that both mechanical and prostaglandin
ripening is acceptable and safe.
Prior to beginning an induction, the Bishop score (cervical dilation, effacement, station,
consistency, and position) is assessed. With Bishop scores less than five, a cervical
ripening agent is commonly used. The mechanical dilation with a foley catheter works by both
a direct stretching of the lower uterine segment and cervix and a local inflammatory
response that releases matrix metalloproteinases and prostaglandins. It is often chosen due
to its lower cost, low incidence of systemic side effects, and low risk of hyperstimulation.
Compared to misoprostol a foley with oxytocin was more effective at induction in primiparous
patients, more effective at improving the dilation, safe to use after misoprostol, and not
associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture in a vaginal birth after cesarean
(VBAC). The foley was also shown to have a shorter induction time and less contractile
abnormalities than prostaglandin E2 gel and no increased rate of uterine rupture in VBAC
attempts. The use of extra-amniotic saline infusion with a foley catheter has been used to
augment the mechanical stretching, however this did not decrease the induction time or
improve the outcomes. Finally, a Cochrane Database review found that mechanical methods of
cervical ripening were equally effective as prostaglandin agents.
Although the safety, efficacy, and side effects of foley catheter ripening have been
compared with multiple other methods for cervical ripening, very few studies have compared
different protocols for foley placement. One study showed that the use of oxytocin while the
foley catheter was in place did not significantly shorten the time to delivery. Levy et al
showed that a larger, 80 ml, balloon resulted in a greater post-ripening dilation and a
higher number of deliveries in 24hours. No study to date has examined how the traction
placed on the foley catheter affects the outcome.
Therefore, we propose doing a randomized controlled study in which the control is the
current standard of care at MetroHealth Medical Center of placing a 500cc weight on the
foley and placing it to gravity over the end of the bed. The comparison will be the method
used at many institutions where the foley catheter is placed on gentle traction and taped to
the inner thigh of the patient.
The primary outcomes measured will be a post-ripening dilation of 3cm or more and time to
delivery. The secondary outcomes are patient pain/comfort rating and method of delivery.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01127581 -
Efficacy & Safety Study Comparing Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) for Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01139801 -
Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor: Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Conjunction With Foley Balloon
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06324279 -
Cervical Sliding Sign to Predict Outcome of Induction of Labor
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05864326 -
Heated Saline in Cervical Balloon for Labor Induction, a RCT
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06056141 -
Induction of Labour at Term With Low Dose Oral Misoprostol Versus a Foley Catheter
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04529837 -
Ultrasound Assessment of DILAPAN-S
|
||
Completed |
NCT02477085 -
Methods of Labor Induction and Perinatal Outcomes
|
||
Completed |
NCT03138252 -
Study of the Effectiveness of Cervical Ripening Balloon With and Without Oxytocin
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02098421 -
Foley Labor Induction Trial at Term and in PROM
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01720394 -
Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00451308 -
Induction of Labor With a Foley Balloon Catheter: Inflation With 30ml Compared to 60ml
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05511727 -
Use of Single Versus Double Foley's Catheter in Pre-induction Cervical Ripening
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02762942 -
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Supracervical Balloon Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01283022 -
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of the 200 Microgram (mcg) Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI 200) in Women at Term Gestation (The MVI-PK Study)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00684606 -
Transcervical Foley Catheter With or Without Oxytocin for Induction of Labor
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05759364 -
The Effect of IV PAPAVERINE 80 mg Prior to Catheter Balloon Insertion on Bishop Score and Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03854383 -
Using Isosorbide Mononitrate in Reducing Time in Induction of Labor in Post Date Women
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01428037 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03752073 -
Comparison of Two Mechanical Methods of Outpatient Ripening of the Cervix
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03045939 -
Cervical Ripening With the Double Balloon Device for 6 Hours Compared With 12 Hours
|
N/A |