Clinical Trials Logo
  1. Home
  2. Induced; Birth
  3. NCT05671224
  4. Details
NCT05671224 Clinical Trial

Visual Aids for Induction of Labor RCT

Induced; Birth Clinical Trial

— VAIL  

Official title:
Visual Aids for Induction of Labor (IOL): A Randomized Controlled Trial for Assessment of Patient IOL Knowledge

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data
NCT number NCT05671224
Other study ID # 202301001
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 20, 2023
Est. completion date June 20, 2024

Study information
Verified date February 2024
Source Washington University School of Medicine
Contact Halley Staples, MD
Phone 3142616795
Email h.l.staples@wustl.edu
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to develop a visual aid tool for induction education informed by the experiences and needs of historically marginalized pregnant women, as well as determine the impact of the patient-informed visual aid on patient knowledge, satisfaction, and trust in physicians regarding induction methods.

Description:

This is a multi-phased study of patients undergoing IOL. Only the second phase of the study will be detailed in this protocol, as this will be the RCT portion of the study's design. We will test the efficacy of the visual aid by conducting a randomized trial of routine counseling versus counseling with the use of a visual aid (informed by patient interviews in the first phase) at the time of admission for IOL and studying the effect of the visual aid on patient knowledge, trust in providers, and satisfaction.

Recruitment information / eligibility
Status Recruiting
Enrollment 84
Est. completion date June 20, 2024
Est. primary completion date June 20, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 45 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients scheduled for or admitted for induction of labor and who can speak, read, and write in the English language. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients undergoing induction termination or with a history of prior cesarean section, major fetal anomaly, known chromosomal anomaly, or fetal growth restriction with doppler abnormalities. Patients whose induction has already commenced will also be excluded.

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Intervention

Other:
• Visual aid
Handout and video describing different types of induction of labor

Locations
Country Name City State
United States Parkview Tower Saint Louis Missouri

Sponsors (1)
Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Washington University School of Medicine

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (11)

Anderson LA, Dedrick RF. Development of the Trust in Physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships. Psychol Rep. 1990 Dec;67(3 Pt 2):1091-100. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1990.67.3f.1091. — View Citation

Bailey JM, Crane P, Nugent CE. Childbirth education and birth plans. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;35(3):497-509, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.04.005. — View Citation

Beckmann M, Cooper C, Pocock D. INFORMed choices: facilitating shared decision-making in health care. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Jun;55(3):294-7. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12343. Epub 2015 Jun 5. — View Citation

Berger B, Schwarz C, Heusser P. Watchful waiting or induction of labour--a matter of informed choice: identification, analysis and critical appraisal of decision aids and patient information regarding care options for women with uncomplicated singleton late and post term pregnancies: a review. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 May 7;15:143. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0663-y. — View Citation

Cahill AG, Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Lopez JD, Macones GA. A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):523.e1-523.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.026. Epub 2018 Feb 1. — View Citation

Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566. — View Citation

Hamm RF, Srinivas SK, Levine LD. Risk factors and racial disparities related to low maternal birth satisfaction with labor induction: a prospective, cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2658-z. — View Citation

Irani RA, Foster S. Overview of the mechanisms of induction of labor. Semin Perinatol. 2015 Oct;39(6):426-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Sep 11. — View Citation

Rahman S, Kripalani S, Keegan E, Sparks A, Amdur R, Moawad G, Sheth S, Klebanoff J. An educational video's impact on the induction of labor experience: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Jan;4(1):100495. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100495. Epub 2021 Sep 24. — View Citation

Rosenthal L, Lobel M. Gendered racism and the sexual and reproductive health of Black and Latina Women. Ethn Health. 2020 Apr;25(3):367-392. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1439896. Epub 2018 Feb 15. — View Citation

Sperlich M, Gabriel C, St Vil NM. Preference, knowledge and utilization of midwives, childbirth education classes and doulas among U.S. black and white women: implications for pregnancy and childbirth outcomes. Soc Work Health Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;58(10):988-1001. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2019.1686679. Epub 2019 Nov 4. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome
Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Induction of labor knowledge Multiple choice questions 10 minutes (during completion of survey)
Secondary Patient satisfaction Likert scale (1-10) 10 minutes (during completion of survey)
Secondary Patient trust in providers survey 10 minutes (during completion of survey)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03730220 - The Norwegian Induction Project: a Pilot for a Prospective National Audit
Completed NCT05100264 - Effect of Acidic Vaginal pH on the Efficacy of Dinoprostone for Labor Induction N/A
Completed NCT05037617 - The REDUCED-I Pilot Trial: REDucing the Utilization of CEsarean Sections With Induction N/A
Recruiting NCT06272591 - Comparison of Patient Satisfaction With Home Induction and In-patient Induction.
Completed NCT03670836 - Comparison of Misoprostol Ripening Efficacy With Dilapan Phase 4
Completed NCT04017247 - Continuous Versus Intermittent Oxytocin Infusion for Induction of Labor N/A
Completed NCT05062343 - Cook Balloon vs Dilapan-S for Outpatient Cervical Ripening N/A
Completed NCT02788305 - Effect of Maternal Obesity on Labour Induction in Postdate Pregnancy N/A
Terminated NCT04004845 - Labor Protocol Study
Recruiting NCT06053073 - Induction to Labour With Double Cervical Ballon at Home Versus at Hospital N/A
Completed NCT04645823 - Spinal Fentanyl or Epidural Analgesia in the Early First Phase of Induced Labor Phase 4
Completed NCT04746248 - Outpatient Labor Induction Using Oral Misoprostol in Norway N/A
Completed NCT04756089 - Stimulation Therapy for Inducing Mothers N/A
Recruiting NCT05798728 - Outpatient Transcervical Balloon For Induction of Labor N/A
Withdrawn NCT04739683 - Cervical Ripening With Foley Bulb Versus Dilapan-S at Home N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04307199 - Membrane Sweeping to Prevent Post-term Pregnancy: The MILO Study N/A
Completed NCT03725397 - Inpatient Versus Outpatient Foley Cervical Ripening Study N/A
Recruiting NCT05719467 - SAINT: Safe Induction of Labor Trial Phase 3
Completed NCT03113227 - Value of Measuring Cervical Angle and Length by Ultrasound in Prediction of Successful Induction of Delivery N/A