Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Patients undergoing emergency surgery for peritonitis are at increased risk of abdominal wall-related complications. In patients with peritonitis the risk of incisional hernia (IH) is extremely elevated. The incidence of IH in patients operated with peritonitis is up to 54 %, compared with an incidence of 11-26 % in the general surgical population. Moreover, up to 24.1 % of patients with peritonitis undergoing emergency laparotomy may develop fascial dehiscence. The evaluation of quality of life of patients with IH showed lower mean scores on physical components of health-related quality of life and body image. The prophylactic mesh implantation demonstrated to reduce the incisional hernia rate in patients undergoing vascular or bariatric procedures. However, the intraperitoneal non absorbable mesh implantation in infected fields is generally considered at least of doubtful safety because of the theoretical increased risk of chronic mesh infection and enterocutaneous fistula. Most incisional hernias develop during the first three months after surgery, which represents the critical period for the healing of transected muscular and fibrous layers of the abdominal wall. However, most studies recommended a long-term follow up period of up to at least 5 years for midline abdominal incisions to determine the real incisional hernia rate. The midline abdominal incision is preferred in abdominal surgery, as it provides wide and rapid access compared other incisions. However, the incidence of incisional hernias is higher following midline abdominal incisions than in other abdominal incisions. In emergency surgery the midline incision in the majority of cases is a necessity. Several factors affect the process of wound healing: surgical site infection, poor surgical technique, and patient-related factors (i.e. peritonitis, old age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, nutritional deficiencies, hepatic cirrhosis, jaundice, renal impairment, malignancy, cardiac disease, chest problems, previous abdominal incisions, steroid therapy). Data about the use of biological prosthesis in infected fields are scarce and derive principally from case reports and case series. However, indications about their use and usefulness in infected fields have been recently published by the Italian Biological Prosthesis Working Group (IBPWG). A previously published prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of implantation of biological prosthesis in high risk patients in order to reduce the incidence of incisional hernia. This study suggested the efficacy of this kind of prosthesis in reducing incisional hernia rate in patients with multiple risk factors. A recently published meta-analysis showed as the use of biological prosthesis in ventral hernia repair resulted in a lower infectious wound complication rate but in an similar recurrence rate. These results supports the application of biological prosthesis in high risk patients. One recent systematic review evaluated the positive effect on incisional hernia rate of the prophylactic mesh positioning in high risk patients. No randomized trials have been published since now about the use of biological prosthesis in contaminated or infected fields. The rationale of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of the use of swine dermal collagen prosthesis implanted preperitoneally as a prophylactic procedure against incisional hernia in patients operated in urgency/emergency setting in contaminated/infected fields with peritonitis. The aim of the study is to reduce the incidence of incisional hernia from 50% to 20%.


Clinical Trial Description

n/a


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04681326
Study type Interventional
Source Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
Contact
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date December 1, 2020
Completion date December 1, 2023

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06016426 - Mass Closure vs Layer by Layer Closure N/A
Recruiting NCT05734222 - Optimization of Surgical Treatment of Patients With Incisional Ventral Hernias N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT03105895 - Prevention of Incisional Hernia With an Onlay Mesh Visible on MRI N/A
Completed NCT02089958 - Standardization of Laparoscopic Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT01961687 - A Prospective, Multi-Center Study of Phasix™ Mesh for Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair. N/A
Completed NCT00998907 - PDS*Plus and Wound Infections After Laparotomy N/A
Terminated NCT00498810 - COMplete Versus PArtial Open inCisional Hernia Repair (COMPAC-TRIAL) N/A
Completed NCT04961346 - RCT Comparing Lightweight vs. Heavyweight Meshes in Incisional Hernia Repair N/A
Terminated NCT03912662 - ProGripTM Self-Gripping Polyester Mesh in Incisional Hernia Prevention N/A
Recruiting NCT05620121 - ACute Treatment of Incisional Ventral Hernia
Recruiting NCT03561727 - Risk Factors for Development of Incisional Hernia in Transverse Incisions N/A
Completed NCT03938688 - Randomized Control Trial Comparing Transfascial Suture for Mesh Fixation to No Mesh Fixation N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05568238 - Vacuum Assisted Wound Closure and Permanent On-lay Mesh-mediated Fascial Traction in Patients With Open Abdomen N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02896686 - Efficacy of an Onlay Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Loop Ileostomy Closure Phase 4
Recruiting NCT02277262 - PROPHYlactic Implantation of BIOlogic Mesh in Peritonitis (PROPHYBIOM) Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT02328352 - "BP as a New Device for Surgery and Solid Cancer and Hematopoietic System Tumors Treatment. Effects of BP Implantation" Phase 1/Phase 2
Suspended NCT01520168 - Composix Kugel Mesh Recall Leaves Unresolved Problems of Patient Management N/A
Completed NCT05579652 - Change in Fascial Tension in Open Abdomens
Active, not recruiting NCT03390764 - Hernia After Colorectal Cancer Surgery N/A
Completed NCT02321059 - Validation of the Goodstrength System for Assessment of Abdominal Wall Strength in Patients With Incisional Hernia N/A