Soft and Hard Tissue Changes After Immediate Single-tooth Replacement

Implant Clinical Trial

Official title:

Soft and Hard Tissue Changes After Immediate Single-tooth Replacement With or Without a Submarginal Connective Tissue Graft

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03784430
• Other study ID #: Winsix 1
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 3, 2017
• Est. completion date: June 9, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: May 2022
• Source: Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

A recent systematic review (Lee et al, 2016) reported that placement of a soft tissue graft concurrent with immediate implantation may contribute to the stability of gingival level and the augmentation of soft tissue contour. However, most included studies did not have a control group to directly demonstrate the benefit of an immediate implant combined with soft tissue graft (IMITG) compared to immediate implant alone.The objective of this randomized controlled clinical trial with a parallel design is to evaluate the influence of the connective tissue graft on the buccal bone alterations after tooth extraction and immediate implant placement by means of cone beam computer tomography (CBCT).

Description:

All participants will be selected on a consecutive basis, among individuals, above the age of 18 years, referred to Dental Clinic of the San Raffaele University, with a single failing tooth in the upper and lower jaw from second premolar to second premolar, candidates for a single implant restoration. After local anesthesia, a split-full-split thickness envelope flap, as described for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions by Zucchelli and de Sanctis (2000), will be elevated and the tooth will be extracted a-traumatically. The immediate implantation procedure will be carried out according to the manufacture protocol and 1mm of the transmucosal portion of the implant will be positioned under the buccal bone crest. In the group "Implant+CTG" a connective tissue graft (CTG), resulting from the extraoral de-epithelialization with the knife blade of a free gingival graft harvested from the palate, will be anchored at the anatomic papillae with 2 horizontal mattress sutures and positioned 1 mm coronal to the buccal bone crest and in the apical direction 2 mm above the buccal crest. Patients will be followed for 6 months after implant placement and 6 months after loading.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: June 9, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: June 9, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• a single tooth to be extracted for endodontic failure, fractures, root caries or resorption in the maxillary and mandibular area from second premolar to second premolar

• patient in good systemic health, with no contraindication for oral surgical interventions

Exclusion Criteria:

• patients with impaired systemic diseases that will interfere with surgical interventions (autoimmune diseases, uncontrolled diabetes)

• assumption of bisphosphonate

• smoking more than 10 cigarettes a day

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Implant

Intervention

Procedure:
• Immediate dental implant placement
Tooth will be extracted and a dental implant will be positioned at the same time.
• Immediate dental implant placement with CTG
Tooth will be extracted and a dental implant will be positioned at the same time with a connective tissue graft.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Italy	Massimo de Sanctis	Milan	Mi

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

References & Publications (4)

Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Buser D, Belser U. Influence of implant neck design on facial bone crest dimensions in the esthetic zone analyzed by cone beam CT: a comparative study with a 5-to-9-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Sep;27(9):1055-64. doi: 10.1111/clr.12692. Epub 2015 Sep 15. — View Citation

Jung RE, Philipp A, Annen BM, Signorelli L, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jan;40(1):90-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12027. Epub 2012 Nov 19. — View Citation

Schneider D, Schmidlin PR, Philipp A, Annen BM, Ronay V, Hämmerle CH, Attin T, Jung RE. Labial soft tissue volume evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):612-7. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12246. Epub 2014 Mar 26. — View Citation

Schropp L, Wenzel A, Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A. Fate of the buccal bone at implants placed early, delayed, or late after tooth extraction analyzed by cone beam CT: 10-year results from a randomized, controlled, clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 May;26(5):492-500. doi: 10.1111/clr.12424. Epub 2014 Jun 2. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Volumetric buccal bone changes	Ratio scale - lower values represent a better outcome	6 months
Secondary	Volumetric buccal soft tissue changes	Ratio scale - higher values represent a better outcome	6 months
Secondary	Buccal soft tissue changes	Ratio scale - higher values represent a better outcome	6 months
Secondary	Patient perception outcomes	Visual Analogic Scale - values from '0=no pain' to '10=worst pain imaginable'	1 week and 6 months