Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04345133
Other study ID # UCarabobo
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 9, 2017
Est. completion date March 17, 2018

Study information

Verified date April 2020
Source University of Carabobo
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

OBJECTIVE:

evaluate the effect of undersized drilling upon the primary and secondary stability of immediate implants placed in the anterior sector maxilla.

PATIENTS AND METHODS Study design A randomized comparative clinical trial was carried out. Thirty conical MIS C1 grade 23 titanium alloy (Ti 6Al 4V Eli) implants with a rough surface subjected to dual acid etching and sandblasting, measuring 3.75 mm in maximum diameter and 13 mm in length (MIS® Implants Technologies, Ltd. Bar Levi, Israel), were placed immediately after removal a anterior maxillary tooth in a series of patients treated in the clinic of the Master of Dentistry and Dental Implantology (Santa María University, Dental School, Caracas, Venezuela). The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee.

Patient selection To enrolled in the study, patients had to comply the inclusion/exclusion criteria established to the study: over 18 years of age with indication of one or more immediate implants in the anterior maxilla; no history of ischemic heart disease, uncontrolled diabetes, coagulation disorders, head or neck radiotherapy, intravenous bisphosphonates or uncontrolled periodontal disease. Based on a CTCB evaluation, the teeth involved should have presence of bone ≥ 5 mm from the tooth apex to the lower cortical layer of the nasal fossa / maxillary sinus and no vertical defects greater than 4 mm at the buccal or palatine alveolar crest. Also, patients must have capacity to understand the study protocol and fill consent form to participation in the study.

Study procedure Two operators calibrated for immediate implant placement performed minimally traumatic tooth extraction following local infiltrating anesthesia with 4% articaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine (Artheek® 4%, New Stetic S.A.; Antioquia, Colombia). After evaluating the integrity of the bone walls, drilling sequence was established on a randomized basis.

Conventional drilling (CD) sequence:

- Marking drill ∅1.9 mm at 1500 rpm

- Pilot drill ∅ 2.4 mm and 13 mm in length at 800 rpm.

- Twist drill ∅3 mm at 400 rpm.

Undersized drilling (UD) sequence:

Marking drill ∅1.9 mm at 1500 rpm Pilot drill ∅ 2.4 mm and 13 mm in length at 400 rpm. Implant insertion A surgical motor (MCU MIS, model M0132, W&H, Burmoos, Austria) with a 20:1 reducing implant handpiece was used to insert the implants at 20 rpm and applying a torque of 10 Ncm. Following placement of the implant in the bed, manual insertion was continued to reach the final implant position, established as 4 mm from the gingival margin.

Study variables Two torque meters (MIS® Implants LTD, models MT-RI040 and MT-RT070, Bar Levi, Israel) were used to insert and sequentially measure the maximum IT reached on positioning the implant in the socket. A Smart-peg Nro 49 model 100480 was fitted to the connection of each implant and an Osstell ISQ® (SN 4669 Osstell AB, Goteborg, Sweden) was used to perform RFA analysis and obtain corresponding ISQ value at insertion time (RFA1). A 4 mm height healing screw was used to seal the implant, and then additional RFA measurements was made at 6 week (RFA2) and 12 week (RFA3) post-implantation


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 30
Est. completion date March 17, 2018
Est. primary completion date December 17, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

indication of one or more immediate implants in the anterior maxilla; No history of ischemic heart disease, No History of uncontrolled diabetes, No coagulation disorders, No head or neck radiotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

Periodontal Disease. History of EV or Oral Bisphosphonate

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Dental Implants Insertion Drilling Sequence
Drilling sequence protocol to insert immediate Dental Implants at the Maxilla.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Carabobo

References & Publications (1)

Sierra-Rebolledo A, Allais-Leon M, Maurette-O'Brien P, Gay-Escoda C. Primary Apical Stability of Tapered Implants Through Reduction of Final Drilling Dimensions in Different Bone Density Models: A Biomechanical Study. Implant Dent. 2016 Dec;25(6):775-782. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Insertion Torque Maximum torque in N.cm obtained during insertion of the implant at baseline, through study completion in average 1 year
Primary RFA Implant Stability Implant Stability measure by Radio-Frequency Analysis. at baseline, through study completion in average 1 year
Secondary RFA2 Implant Stability Implant Stability measure by Radio-Frequency Analysis 6 weeks later 6 weeks after baseline, trough study completion in average 1 year
Secondary RFA3 Implant Stability Implant Stability measure by Radio-Frequency Analysis 12 weeks later 12 weeks after baseline, trough study completion in average 1 year
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04189718 - Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification Versus Conventional Implant Site N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03689933 - Stability of Patient-specific Root-analogue Implants and Conventional Root-form Implants for Treating Non-restorable Single-rooted Maxillary Teeth N/A
Recruiting NCT04442763 - The Effect of Osseodensification on Implant Stability in Posterior Maxilla N/A
Completed NCT05141851 - The Impact of Thread Length on Implant Stability N/A
Recruiting NCT04718246 - Stability Of Dental Implants Placed In Healed Bony Sites Of Hyperlipidemic Patients: A Case Series N/A
Completed NCT04761445 - Comparison Between Two Different Tissue-Level Implant Systems: A Prospective Clinical Study N/A